SHOULD WATER BE FREE?

SHOULD WATER BE FREE?


  • Total voters
    37

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,582
P9TWZKo.png
[Does. Not. Compute. CATO what do I say?] :troll:
 

ghostwriterx

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,891
Reputation
811
Daps
14,584
The air that we breathe can be readily consumed immediately; you could even say that you yourself are a company that collects the air and sells it to yourself for free. However water isn't always drinkable in the state in whcih you find it, which is why companies go and purify the water at their cost and sell that water in order to make their money back and continue producing purified water for the public to use... not really the same thing.

Any sources to back this up? Are companies really making "undrinkable" water drinkable?
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,788
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
The air that we breathe can be readily consumed immediately; you could even say that you yourself are a company that collects the air and sells it to yourself for free. However water isn't always drinkable in the state in whcih you find it, which is why companies go and purify the water at their cost and sell that water in order to make their money back and continue producing purified water for the public to use... not really the same thing.

Assume that oxygen couldn't be readily consumed immediately, yet was imperative to life anyway, similar to water. I doubt you'd say oxygen should cost anything. Since water is so necessary for humans to survive and otherwise freely available before incorporation, a basic and salubrious form should be free for all. Anything more, like spring water, a person should have the right to sell. But if water should ever become scarce, said spring water should then become free. Everything shouldn't be sold simply because markets are involved.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,481
Reputation
4,659
Daps
89,778
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Assume that oxygen couldn't be readily consumed immediately, yet was imperative to life anyway, similar to water. Would you therefore approve of selling oxygen>
I wouldn't think it should be free... and from my understanding oxygen isnt nearly as scarce as fresh drinking water.
Making it a bad comparison IMO when debating cost.
 

ghostwriterx

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,891
Reputation
811
Daps
14,584
Key words being "isnt always"...:comeon:
if you're suggesting that it is always drinkable, I'll glad provide a source of undrinkable water, that must be purified.

Not suggesting that at all, just curious how many of these companies are actually providing the service of "purifying" undrinkable water as opposed to just repackaging perfectly fine water.:yeshrug:
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
88
Reputation
40
Daps
221
Reppin
The Sonics
and this is a big problem, which some states are repairing
Fbz6j3V.png

not only does this teach the homeowner a valuable lesson about self reliance and fiscal responsibility but it also stimulates the economy as he will have to get a loan and hire people to rebuild the house. :blessed:


technically I don't need traffic lights and each man should decide for himself when he should stop his own car, Your oppressive big government tendencies are showing friend! BUT in any case through the thievery of my money as tax, these lights were already paid for
:sas2:

:what:who needs libraries? kids can access all the information they need on the web for free on their phones or they can just learn from nature, instead of having to be brainwashed at your institutionally run "libraries", the tax (theft) money used for libraries should go to subsidy companies so they can afford to create more jobs

water should be privatized, this will create jobs and improve the economy

:snoop:We don't need big government telling us how to use water, let people make businesses out of the water supply so we can grow the economy
free your mind breh
Didn't realize I was arguing with a market anarchist.:huhldup:
I seriously doubt I can persuade someone who thinks that if you're poor you should die of thirst and your house should burn down that they're wrong, I've encounter such dogmatic thinking before and it's always entrenched as hell.
But if you're advocating such radical changes the US (and those are all radical changes to the way the US works) you don't get to wave your OMG COMMUNIST RUSSIA flag, the US has been doing those things well before the USSR was formed.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,406
Reputation
3,905
Daps
166,656
Reppin
Brooklyn
oh, dear...


I have a plenty to say on the issue...


sigh, maybe tomorrow, but you're dealing one hand to a set of people and another to another... ehh it needs a little work


property rights need to be respected but if you're raking in more than 300k a year on said property or it's specifically for water in some shape they need to catch a extra levy.
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,336
Reputation
1,355
Daps
13,415
Reppin
Harlem
If we can subsidize Wall Street with trillions of dollars of tax money, then we can subsidize water for people.

If we can spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year in the defense budget terrorizing these foreign countries, we can spend that money on making water free and accessible for people.

And we could literally achieve this through collective action if we started writing our own legislation like the corporations do.

We can't forget through collective action we control the politicians and therefore the policies and therefore the distribution of our trillions of tax dollars. The politicians are playing with OUR chips.

Edit: Just viewed the results of the poll... :salute: to the overwhelming majority of righteous HL bredren who voted free water for the people :myman:
 
Top