Has gone over the character limit so
@Stack Money
No, I'll defend him in any comparison with a player he's actually better than. That's not Kobe exclusive, it goes for every player to have played this game.
My rebuttal isn't rings don't matter, its that they're heavily circumstantial and shouldn't be used as a measure of individual player greatness. A player shouldn't be knocked because of a ring count when they on average play outstanding in the postseason (LeBron is literally one of the greatest postseason performers ever, same with Charles Barkley) but their teams don't play up to par enough for them to win it all. KG didn't win his lone title until he landed on a team with great support around him, and he'd have zero had he stayed in Minny. You need help to win, and ring comparisons usually come down to X player got more help than another (when the two players are on comparable levels, at least).
I never gave LBJ the sole credit for winning 50-60 games in a season. Read again, I said when Cleveland began to surround him with the pieces he needed they had great success. No need for the strawman. Man, this is funny because I'm not close to a LBJ fan. You apparently just can't handle any argument that destroys your position.
1) The most important aspect of defense, especially against superstar scorers like T Mac & Iverson who NO ONE could stop 1on1 let alone Kobe, is help defense. They need to be double teamed and when they get to the basket, which they can do at will (especially AI with his penetration), it was up to the Lakers help defense including Shaq to make their attempt as difficult as possible if not erase it completely. To say that Kobe's a better defender because he didn't guard T mac or Iverson out on the perimeter is silly, both were phenomenal inside players that had no issue beating players 1on1 to get penetration. No need for the hyperbole that the Lakers would surrender 60 to those guards every night, that's dumb and of course they wouldn't have three peated without Kobe, I'm not diminishing his role but saying he just wasn't Shaq and most importantly he played next to the most dominant player ever which played a huge reason as to why he got those three titles.
2) Robinson often provided help on Shaq, the two collaborated to guard him and he didn't retire until the Spurs 2nd championship season in 2003. I'm only speaking of the threepeat era, Shaq was no longer the best player in the game after that. This "cancel out" stuff doesn't make sense, for one I would consider Duncan to be better than Kobe too and second he was right behind Shaq for best player in the league at the time so who cares if he managed to match him. 3) The way Shaq got mauled by defenders on a regular basis you shouldn't be bringing up energy, getting smacked every possession by giants desperate to stop your inside dominance takes a lot out of you not to mention playing the role of a strong weakside defender and having to muscle your way in the post to get inside position against other 7 footers which takes less energy than taking 18 foot jumpshots. No need to even get into the difference in conditioning levels between the two. Lol at it being Shaq's "turn", he didn't have any advantage that Kobe didn't have himself. Kobe was and could not be guarded by Iverson, his performance is not hindered by him in even the slightest. Guys like AI and T Mac did not make his job as a scorer harder. Shaq was the one getting doubled with more frequency than anyone in the entire association. He consistently had harder matchups.
3) Dominant rebounding is a part of defense dumbass, that ends possession for the opposition. You can measure its impact relative to a perimeter player, and it's another reason why you don't just say Kobe has comparable defensive impact. You cannot ignore it, he was dominant on the glass in addition to leading the team in scoring each postseason run with a greater level of efficiency DESPITE getting doubled far more frequently. What does position have to do with posing a threat on the inside? Jordan was as dominant a finisher as Shaq relative to his position, as is LeBron James. All three have hit upwards of 70% at the rim throughout their prime careers. Its not their fault Kobe couldn't reach that same level of inside dominance. Shaq didn't need to pose a threat from the perimeter when he was the most effective the game has ever seen in the paint, which every team in the league designs their defense to protect the opposing team from getting to and scoring from.
No that graphic thats not stops short of the entire postseason and purposely leaves out certain statistics to make Kobe look better does not prove anything. And if you want to use stats, you can judge production very well by PER which tracks stat accumulation on a per minute basis.
2000 postseason
Shaq - 30.5
Kobe - 19.7
2001 postseason
Shaq - 28.7
Kobe - 25.0
2002 postseason
Shaq - 29.7
Kobe - 23.2
Go ahead and try to spin that around somehow.
You still butthurt by that graphic it was to show you idiots that claim Shaq carried Kobe are not only wrong but Kobe had better numbers so all that talk about Kobe bein the clear cut Robin is bullshyt, the fact it makes you haters emotional means it did its job and you bytchin about reboundin not bein in the stats but neither are assists which Kobe had way more of but of course you'd ignore that stat cause it doesn't fit your narrative
Nobody is mad at an incomplete graphic with zero context and this post is so hypocritical. How can you sit here and say that LeBron needed Wade to carry him to championships, and then get into your feelings when anyone suggests Shaq carried Kobe when Shaq was at the top of the league for three years and Wade rapidly declining with each progressing season to the point where he wasn't even top 15. I never even said Shaq carried Kobe, I consider that to be a very disrespectful phrase especially when they were both top three players in the game post 2000. Kobe had 1.3 more apg in 2000, 2.9 in 2001 and 1.8 in 2002. Thats not "way more" and Shaq's apg was phenomenal for a center, man is truly one of the GOAT big man passers and a bit underrated in that aspect.
You keep saying that its been established that LBJ had better teams without actually establishing anything. You can't just state things without a credible argument as if its a fact. LeBron's Cavs in '06 were as bad as Kobe's support post Shaq pre Gasol. You can look at the name Larry Hughes and claim thats help, but he shot 31% in the playoffs and was a clear bust as an acquisition. Lamar Odom was a damn good role player, and better than anyone LBJ had on his team at the time including Big Z. How is it arguable that his Miami teams were better than the three peat Lakers? Seriously, explain this. You should give acknowledgment to the coaches theyre responsible for the schemes executed on both ends of the court and managing personalities on the team. Pat Riley was much more involved as a general manager than coach, Spoelstra had full control over the gameplan and he does not come close to Phil as a tactician. Again, explain how that combination of role players isn't better than the Heat's supporting cast around Miami. They didn't have anyone better than Horry or Grant, Fisher is better than anyone they had in their backcourt, Fox is better than any of their wings, Harper would be perfect for their defensive scheme and probably their best perimeter defender during the later portions of the Heat era.
You're just a homer if you think LBJ hasn't played on Cleveland teams with little to no support like Kobe in the '06 season. Straight up. The '06 Cavs were exactly that. His teams were not always in the discussion for best in the East and were no better than 4th in seeding until 2007.
I don't think you're getting anything thats being stated here if you're still mocking LBJ for Wade, the second best player on the team, for being hurt. Thats kinda important. Again, don't dodge this question, how many rings does Kobe have if Pau is severely limited with injury or Shaq is a shell of himself. Its a rhetorical question.
Kobe was Batman in at least 2 finals appearances wit Gasol so thats not more than you can say about Kobe, you'd have to be a dumbass to think LeBron was Batman in more finals appearances than Kobe when Kobe's Batman roles won 2 rings and Bron got one of his rings wit a healthy Wade as the Batman. You goin full retard right now gettin all emotional screamin about you don't care what analyst who are former players and coaches say as if you know more than they do, you obviously wrong about Wade but you don't want to admit he's better than most of the league even when not 100% cause you so desperate to suck off LeBron
So apparently you're under the delusion that Batman means you win a ring. Thats false, LBJ fulfilled that role in the '12'-'15 Finals as the unquestionable best player on the court. You might be asking yourself how one can be the best player on either team in four finals and yet walk away with two rings, well this is where teammates come into question and why its stupid to pretend as though rings are the end all be all when who you play with directly influences the number of rings you have. "At least two finals appearances" for Kobe is cute. No, I'm not wrong about Wade he was god awful in those Finals and former players aren't any less subject to bias as us fans. Watch some episodes of Open Court and tell me these guys should be respected as some beacon for perfect basketball judgement. Their opinions are no less valuable than our own.
LBJ's ability to defend the post, switch, stick to his man like glue on the perimeter being impervious to screens and provide strong help defense acting as a rim protector has provided enormous value for his teams D throughout his defensive prime. Kobe just never came close to being the disruptive force that he was. Sure, as the years went on LBJ's intensity declined but since you're cleverly using early Kobe only as a defender, use LBJ from '09 and then seriously suggest to me Kobe ever hit a level greater than that. Man had a real case for DPOY that year as his team was an incredible 8 points worse defensively without him on the court. He anchored the #3 defense in the league.
Those stats aren't half truths, those are actual playoff circumstances where the pressure is at its greatest. Game 7's and elimination games are great ways to measure a players dominance in the playoffs. The stats DO take into account his failures with Miami in 2011, its just that he's generally been so reliable that they're nothing more than a blip on the radar. I knew you'd ignore this though to push your narrative.
Magic was 5-14 from the field and was the 3rd best player on his own team that game. In what universe is that not disappearing. Magic is one of the most efficient scorers ever and came up incredibly small in the closeout game. Its obvious you only hold this standard to LBJ and no one else.
No, Kobe was in the middle of his prime. At no point was he better than he was in '08 or '09 postseasons where he completely destroyed the Western Conference with some of the most dominant offensive exhibitions this game has ever seen. He didn't do Phoenix like that in '06, and wasn't as smart of a player as he would later become in his near 30's. Its just another case of a player maturing his game as he grows older. Don't leave out Lamar Odom when you mention Kobe's teammates by the way, he was fantastic for them on both ends of the floor.
Now you cryin some more about LeBron losin to Dwight in the East Finals when that team was booty outside of him, Ima ignore what you stans and the media says about LeBron bein able to guard all five positions and just acknowledge LeBron can't guard Dwight but he damn sure can cancel out whatever he scores on the other end of the floor like Kobe did. LeBron was already gettin called the best player in the league at that point so he shoulda beasted against that Magic team not let Rashard Lewis and Turkeyglue stop him, and don't try to act like Gasol is some defensive beast comparable to Shaq he was always called Gasoft for a reason he didn't shut down Dwight but Kobe torched those other Magic players who weren't on his level which is what LeBron should've done but couldn't do yet you say he's better than Kobe.

Kobe didn't win that cause he had another big man that was defensively a monster Gasol is an offensive player his defense is usually shakey, but you wanna spin shyt once again to take credit away from Kobe by makin up bullshyt about big men carryin him when that narrative has been destroyed in here already.

"
1) That Magic team was very well constructed outside of Howard. They were 7th in three point percentage (on huge volume) and then complimented their perimeter attack with a big man that was dominant in the P&R, destroyed the offensive glass granting the team extra opportunities and could demand double team inside. Defensively, they were the best in the league thanks to Howard influence. So you had a great defense and an offense that could bomb 3's on you plus score inside. Thats a damn good basketball team and its no surprise they won 59 games that year.
2) LBJ can't guard all five positions, that's always been a wild myth. Not sure why you assumed I believed that
3) LeBron averaged 38.3 ppg 8.3rpg 8.0apg 1.2spg 1.2bpg against Orlando in that conference Finals on 59 TS%. What the actual fukk are you talking about. Cavs lost because they didn't have the support around Bron that Kobe did. Kobe didn't do anything that LBJ didn't do himself if not better.
4) Pau Gasol was a very good post defender and had the length/size to guard a player like Dwight 1on1 because of his lack of counter moves. His issues were more in the P&R than anything but the Lakers usually paired him with a big man that could more capably cover. Remember, Bynum was on that team as well, and Odom was a phenomenal small ball four
5) You've used the word carry more than I have. Never said Kobe got carried, but that he's had more support than LBJ which have directly led to his greater ring count which is correct.