WHIPPEDCream
♔Evil Queen.
The "sista," is a mule.

I don't even have to read this thread to know that Nate was defended on here.

I don't even have to read this thread to know that Nate was defended on here.

There is nothing to give up. You have your opinion of the situation, please stop trying to police mine because you're not going to change it.

Right? As in he didn't rape her. Because Celeste wasn't convicted for rape.
The "sista," is a mule.
I don't even have to read this thread to know that Nate was defended on here.
I don't have to change it, you're wrong and the truth is on my side. I don't have an opinion on this, I'm rolling with the facts.
I'm just advising you to use the eye of discernment next time![]()
She's not using logic, very few women are able to talk about Rape from a logical standpoint like the girl on twitter. It's not their fault though because naturally they view the story from the side of the victim because they themselves may have been a victim or they just have a natural gender bias as this could happen to them.
She is speaking as someone who knows them; I would hardly call her objective. But just like white people look for a token black person to defend certain things, men will look for a token woman...
shed light on an event that was a lie so these black women failed.
Exactly!!! I'm tired of unaccountable black folks
You're dense as hell. He was never found guilty of rape. It was assault and his other charges that were the same as Nate's were dismissed.


nate
I KNOW U DID IT AND U A c00n, BUT THE VERDICT MAIN JOHNNY A CERTIFIED PLAYERIt's the same in regard to actual experience of the victim. (It's like the difference between a defendant being charged with man slaughter versus being charged with murder...the still had the same outcome for the victim). In this case, it was intercourse without consent.

It's laughable that you'd think I'd take your advice considering the things you'd condone as long as it was done by a black man (since white men do it too).
It's the same in regard to actual experience of the victim. (It's like the difference between a defendant being charged with man slaughter versus being charged with murder...the still had the same outcome for the victim). In this case, it was intercourse without consent.
So the majority White Jurors in a majority white town thought Nate was the Token Black Person to give a pass to for Raping a White Woman?
And he shouldn't be?