Sista Who Went To PSU with Nate Parker Clears The Smoke :wow:

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,064
Reputation
7,040
Daps
80,061
Reppin
BaBylon
Really? You see examples of this daily, especially involving police.
the difference is evidence(camera, witnesses, lies etc ) show the police use unnecessary excessive force on black people but they still get off because they all partners in crime
 

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,064
Reputation
7,040
Daps
80,061
Reppin
BaBylon
Maybe, maybe not. Nat Turner spared some poor whites so who knows what he would think today. All we know is nate made a movie about his life. Personal life aside, if its an accurate telling idk what the fuss is about.

And im willing to bet most black movies and movies in general you like went through white studios. The malcolm x film went through warner bros.

Its just funny people are pulling out all these standards for a movie i doubt they've ever had before.
also alot famous black films are made by cacs
 

Timeis$

Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
2,817
Reputation
429
Daps
9,296
Look at our Black Queens standing up for us :blessed: But y'all want the "pawgs" :comeon:
In all honestly loyalty doesn't make anyone's dikk hard or not hard. Black women being loyal isn't going to make anyone wife them alone and it's not going to make black men not attracted to or intersted in other races.
lol as many black "queens" ive seen call this man a rapist out of anger of him having a white wife:mjlol:.

this one sista does not make it all good. But its whatever the damage is done. Im still gonna support nates film.
"Loyalty" is overated by both black men and women.

People fukk who their attracted too and marry who their heart falls in love with and the more options you have the more your taste vary...but we can pretend being "down" or "woke" alone is really going to make people not seek out their best interest.
I am lurking LSA right now. It's like a witch hunt. I swear, if you are a BM born in this generation, you are better dead than alive. BW hate you in this world. Absolutely hates you. No type of process whatsoever. I was equally disgusted by BM who attacked Korryn Gaines. I am just sick right now. We are fighting for our lives as Black ppl with white supremacy heating up with unprecedented temperatures and all we want to do is blame parents, the other gender, children, what the fukk is wrong with us!

Listening to cac whores regarding anything whatsoever is folly. Rape especially. Cacs are liars and decivers by nature, but their women are even more konniving and treacherous than their male counterpart.

White chick got trained by a bunch of black dudes. In the moment, she loved it. The morning after, she regretted it. Girls like her ruin it for the women who actually get raped. MAYBE....MAYBE she felt pressured into having sex with the other guys. MAYBE.....I'll give you that. And then the next day, she got upset about it and caused drama. That's not rape though. Rape is a girl kicking and screaming and the dude forcing her anyway. Not next morning regrets. The jury already decided she was full of it.
Thats the thing white women staying winning. Never held accountable for their actions, and still have all races of men chasing them. The woman was a whore liar...
 
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,196
Reputation
4,165
Daps
59,005
Reppin
NULL
I'm catching up with this whole thing now, and while I don't have a concrete opinion since I'm still catching up, I just read the phone transcript between the two and it really says a lot about how lacking most people are when it comes to knowledge about rape and consent. By law, if you're drunk you can't consent, but most people can figure that's a hard rule for courts to follow considering how much drunk sex happens with everyone, so with saying that it really brings the case to a grey area. Parker says the woman was active and engaging with them, which is probably true, and she says she doesn't remember much, which could also be true. At that point you're going off non verbal cues, and considering she's active and seems willing to participate, and that non verbal cues can count as consent too, it all makes the whole case a bit of a mess in the end; but then again, what counts as a non verbal cue can go up for debate too. So far it sounds like you really can't blame either party for what they believe went down at that point.

I"m gonna finish catching up now, I'll get to the tweets posted in the op in a bit, but it's shyt like this that makes some rape cases so fukking hard to take a side in, and a bit depressing too.
 
Last edited:

Citi Trends

aka milobased
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
13,457
Reputation
7,105
Daps
89,088
Reppin
C.I.T.I
Malcolm x was funded by Micheal Jordan and Oprah. If white folk had their way it would have never been made.
nate parker funded nat turner though..he already had the movie made and basically picked someone for distribution

it's literally the same situation except cacs are getting their way this time and are having people write this movie off
 

WHIPPEDCream

♔Evil Queen.
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,618
Reputation
-6,859
Daps
7,711
Reppin
The Seven Five
It's all a part of your act.

Oh so, You don't take up for a man because he has black skin= you hate black men.:heh: F*ck him.Wtf I look like taking up for a rapist?Oh, I should ignore that because he is Black?


That's not why he's being defended.
An rational person would look at Nates career and realize that 17 years has past. That in all of this time and previous films he's made, there was never a dust up of this magnitude.

So then one would gather, why now? :jbhmm: And he was found innocent... why now the hoopla?
If you are a rational person you'd then begin to place things into contex. Suddenly the pot of information you have stinks. :feedme:

A rational person would then give pause and step away from the stinky pot. :scust:

If I'm a trained rational person I would know to not be guilt ed into defending a Black Man at all cost just because he is Black and a man.Miss me with that sh*t. & No, I don't think this is all an agenda to "tear the black man down in his moment of success," y'all are going to stop with that bull sh*t excuse.

Go back to the hole you crawled out from to type this nonsense wench

:russ: You are so pathetic.So because I choose not to defend a rapist who has "moved on from this and started a beautiful family," while his victim is DEAD, I am a "wench." GTFO.I'll be that wench then.If that is what makes one a "wench," I'll be a wench any day over a dumb ass mule who acts like an attack dog to defend a rapist.

Why is WHIPPEDCream still allowed to troll and derail various topics

:dahell:

& Now I'm a troll because I don't think he is innocent?:mjlol: I must jump on the bandwagon.F*ck Nate Parker.I'm glad these allegations are coming back up.He thought he was going to merrily move on with his new life, gaining success & fortune and never have to look at the skeletons in his closet again.I hope these allegations are causing him all the distress in the world.I will not see the movie and hope for its flop.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2014
Messages
27,503
Reputation
7,239
Daps
165,534
I'm catching up with this whole thing now, and while I don't have a concrete opinion since I'm still catching up, I just read the phone transcript between the two and it really says a lot about how lacking most people are when it comes to knowledge about rape and consent. By law, if you're drunk you can't consent, but most people can figure that's a hard rule for courts to follow considering how much drunk sex happens with everyone, so with saying that it really brings the case to a grey area. Parker says the woman was active and engaging with them, which is probably true, and she says she doesn't remember much, which could also be true. At that point you're going off non verbal cues, and considering she's active and seems willing to participate, and that non verbal cues can count as consent too, it all makes the whole case a bit of a mess in the end; but then again, what counts as a non verbal cue can go up for debate too. So far it sounds like you really can't blame either party for what they believe went down at that point.

I"m gonna finish catching up now, I'll get to the tweets posted in the op in a bit, but it's shyt like this that makes some rape cases so fukking hard to take a side in, and a bit depressing too.

How drunk is too drunk? Drunk enough not to be able to consent? That's a huge gray area. What if you were both drunk?

If the woman is awake and enjoying it and never says stop but afterwards says she was drunk and normally wouldn't do that....

Now if a dude is having sex with an unconscious corpse or barely conscious person that's pretty blatant.
 

SouthernBelle

#Feyonce
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
6,463
Reputation
510
Daps
12,426
It got suspended???

Based on the message that pops up when you clicked it last night, she put it on private. If the account is completely gone she likely deleted it given the amount of traffic it has probably recieved (and they were going in on her in her mentions pretty bad).

Twitter had no reason to target her given the number of people still posting in support.

Most people just aren't prepared for a viral shyt storm when they post their opinions.
 
Last edited:
Top