Sixers' Matisse Thybulle on not being vaxxed: "This was a decision i made a long time ago..."

[Jazzy B.]

He’s not good enough to be a fall guy. He likely wasn’t going to start over Danny due to his offense being so poor.
Harden Embiid Harris are pretty much the only ones that can be fall guys

You've already got people pushing a narrative that Toronto are going to win because Thybulle is out for half of the games as if he's Kawhi .


He most definitely will be the fall guy if the sixers get bounced out. Even though we know it's going to come down to Harden stinking up the court and Embiid gassing out.

 

[concise]

Did you not read the article? Even that article says that it's not 100%:


"Among fully vaccinated people in the study, there were only three COVID-19 infections detected."



And the original Pfizer study was showing 95% efficacy, not 100% efficacy. Literally no one with a clue has ever said 100% efficacy in preventing disease.

The headline clearly says "they don't".
Same headline made it to several publications like the nytimes.
You don't need to cape for the CDC, they messed up with their messaging at that time.





If it's not 100 percent, you shouldn't be making a definitive statement like this to stumble anyone.

 

[concise]

What’s the point of not getting the second if you got the first? Even if it doesn’t do what you heard it will, you have self evidence it won’t kill you AND…YOU CAN PLAY FOR YOUR TEAM IN THE PLAYOFFS!

Millions of Americans have never gone back for their second shot

and likely never will.

 

[paperbag]

Good for him.

 

[thatrapsfan]

Can't make this shyt up, Chinese medicine

Not only have the Chinese vaccinated like120 % of the population, but... nah I can't

China has a lower vaccination rate among elderly than the United States:

China’s Low Elderly Vaccination Rate Shows Key Vulnerability

 

[Professor Emeritus]

The headline clearly says "they don't".
Same headline made it to several publications like the nytimes.

It's a headline. The headline isn't written by the CDC, it's not even written by the journalist, it's just a one-line summary written by the newspaper editor meant to get people to look at the article. If you read the article you can see that it's a %, not 100%, but they're not going to turn every newspaper headline into a math problem.

If you see a headline that states "Poor black defendants don't get fair trials" or "California's students aren't passing their reading exams", would you assume that meant absolutely 100% or would you just assume it's a generalization and then read the article to find out the answer?

You don't need to cape for the CDC, they messed up with their messaging at that time.



If it's not 100 percent, you shouldn't be making a definitive statement like this to stumble anyone.

The CDC clarified her statement immediately. As in within hours:

Can Vaccinated People Spread the Virus? We Don’t Know, Scientists Say. (Published 2021)

“Dr. Walensky spoke broadly during this interview,” an agency spokesman told The Times. “It’s possible that some people who are fully vaccinated could get Covid-19. The evidence isn’t clear whether they can spread the virus to others. We are continuing to evaluate the evidence.”


There were literally thousands of statements released by the CDC and literally thousands of interviews done, and you're trying to cherry-pick a single line out of a single interview that was immediately clarified and create an entire narrative from it.

The CDC was linking their info constantly, directing you to their site over and over again, where the exact information was available with the exact %'s at all moments. They were never hiding shyt, they were begging you to look at the full info. Every doctor was getting the same information too, you could ask any of them. But you flip over one loose generalization in an interview. The standard you're asking isn't one that would be possible or demanded from any other issue at any other time.

 

[staticshock]

Who cares. You have the right to refuse medical treatment. His life, his choice.

Fukk that vax.. Salute

Will y’all nikkas shut the fukk up about other peoples health decisions, it has nothing to do with u goddamn


Never see any of this energy in real life cuz you’d get slapped up

anti vaxx dudes mad

 

[AAKing23]

anti vaxx dudes mad

Like I said, go publicly berate another grown man to his face in real life about a vaccination and call him a bytch like y'all do on here

 

[PoorAndDangerous]

Practice Chinese quack medicine but be antivax brehs, mans snorting rhino horns but doesn’t understand how vaccines work

 

[No1]

Like I said, go publicly berate another grown man to his face in real life about a vaccination and call him a bytch like y'all do on here

What kind of stupid ass point is this? 95 percent of how you talk to people online isn’t how you would talk to someone in real life. It’s called decorum. Second, I saw people pulling up on people all throughout the pandemic asking them to put their mask on in stores. There’s no way of knowing if a random person ain’t vaccinated but if you made people wear a band that showed that and some dude came and sat in your section at a game in March 2021, everyone is leaving that section or checking them. Lastly, people debate and berate close ones every day about vax status. You’re crying about personal decisions because what he said was stupid and uneducated and most antivax people end up sounding stupid and uneducated and it hurts your feelings. You basically resorted to you can’t beat me as if that someone makes you any less dumb. A lot of people with hands are stupid. Floyd had some damn near sell out views at times and none of us here are beating him in a fight.

 

[No1]

It's a headline. The headline isn't written by the CDC, it's not even written by the journalist, it's just a one-line summary written by the newspaper editor meant to get people to look at the article. If you read the article you can see that it's a %, not 100%, but they're not going to turn every newspaper headline into a math problem.

If you see a headline that states "Poor black defendants don't get fair trials" or "California's students aren't passing their reading exams", would you assume that meant absolutely 100% or would you just assume it's a generalization and then read the article to find out the answer?







The CDC clarified her statement immediately. As in within hours:

Can Vaccinated People Spread the Virus? We Don’t Know, Scientists Say. (Published 2021)

“Dr. Walensky spoke broadly during this interview,” an agency spokesman told The Times. “It’s possible that some people who are fully vaccinated could get Covid-19. The evidence isn’t clear whether they can spread the virus to others. We are continuing to evaluate the evidence.”


There were literally thousands of statements released by the CDC and literally thousands of interviews done, and you're trying to cherry-pick a single line out of a single interview that was immediately clarified and create an entire narrative from it.

The CDC was linking their info constantly, directing you to their site over and over again, where the exact information was available with the exact %'s at all moments. They were never hiding shyt, they were begging you to look at the full info. Every doctor was getting the same information too, you could ask any of them. But you flip over one loose generalization in an interview. The standard you're asking isn't one that would be possible or demanded from any other issue at any other time.

These idiots won’t hear you. And they’re just doubling down because now they get to move freely because of the rest of us getting vaccinated. It ain’t no health decision, nikkas are just stupid and paranoid.

 

[Raphaello]

anti vaxx dudes mad

I'm triple vaxxed. He's a grown man and made his decision and will live with the consequence. No debate necessary

 

[AAKing23]

What kind of stupid ass point is this? 95 percent of how you talk to people online isn’t how you would talk to someone in real life. It’s called decorum. Second, I saw people pulling up on people all throughout the pandemic asking them to put their mask on in stores. There’s no way of knowing if a random person ain’t vaccinated but if you made people wear a band that showed that and some dude came and sat in your section at a game in March 2021, everyone is leaving that section or checking them. Lastly, people debate and berate close ones every day about vax status. You’re crying about personal decisions because what he said was stupid and uneducated and most antivax people end up sounding stupid and uneducated and it hurts your feelings. You basically resorted to you can’t beat me as if that someone makes you any less dumb. A lot of people with hands are stupid. Floyd had some damn near sell out views at times and none of us here are beating him in a fight.

All I see is that you ain't gonna do shyt like the bytch you are, hold this neg back that you gave me too dikksucker

 

[gtj1982]

Like I said, go publicly berate another grown man to his face in real life about a vaccination and call him a bytch like y'all do on here

Y'all the only people I saw out there harassing people for wearing masks.

His lack of vaccination affects his team you think a sports board isn't going to talk about it. You think people aren't going to criticize it.

I know several people who lost their job or had to leave the military for not getting the vaccine don't feel sorry for none of them. Sometimes wish they could retroactively lose all their immunity from their previous vaccines since they are so against them all of a sudden.

 

[concise]

you see a headline that states "Poor black defendants don't get fair trials" or "California's students aren't passing their reading exams", would you assume that meant absolutely 100% or would you just assume it's a generalization and then read the article to find out the answer?

I would assume I'm reading something written from an extremist point of view. Headline would say "most" or give a percentage

The standard you're asking isn't one that would be possible or demanded from any other issue at any other time.

Well, this isn't just any issue, is it?
Major pandemic killing people and drastically affecting the world, the messaging should be on point at all times.

These idiots won’t hear you. And they’re just doubling down because now they get to move freely because of the rest of us getting vaccinated. It ain’t no health decision, nikkas are just stupid and paranoid.

"The rest of us"?
Why are you assuming the rest of us aren't vaccinated because we're saying things could have been done differently with the messaging?