This guy seems to have a complete lack of nuance in his argument.
I agree with him in principle - I've been catching up on all the shows and Smackdown has largely been better. This has nothing to do with "smarks" though. Raw easily has the better and more exciting roster, even with the brilliant AJ Styles on Smackdown. The problem with Raw is the same that it's always been, and that's lazy writing. This guy isn't saying anything that the so-called "smarks" haven't already been saying about Raw. I was happy Owens became champ because I have always liked him as a performer, but I expected his reign to be lukewarm (funnily enough, his reign has been worse than that so far).
Smackdown's writing/booking is noticeably better despite having less time and an arguably less talented roster, and I can't help but wonder if that has to do with the fact that Ryan Ward is the main writer for the show - he had a great run in NXT when it was at it's most popular. Everyone has looked pretty decent to me. Ziggler is relevant again, Miz is the best he's ever been, AJ is AJ, Ambrose is getting back into his groove, as is Wyatt. Even Orton, the most boring fukker on the roster, is interesting again. They had a triple threat between AJ, Ziggler and Corbin and, strangely enough, Corbin did not look out of place.
Contrast to Raw. Massive talents like KO, Rollins, Cesaro, Zayn, Sasha, some of the Cruiserweights not named Kendrick or Perkins - there is so much talent all being booked like garbage. Only two people are being booked well so far on Raw: Charlotte and Braun Stroman. I actually like Stroman, he's the one thing that they've consistently gotten right. Even Nia Jax hasn't been handled well enough. This guy is completely correct in his assessment of Raw, but the only incorrect thing is that he assumes this is Raw giving the smarks what they want

. Everyone I know who could be identified as a smark has BEEN complaining about booking

. This guy is late!