How the hell you just blatently make up shyt about a game that happened less than 1 year ago?
The main lineup for the Cavs that game was Kyrie-JR-Lebron-Love-TT. The main lineup for the Warriors was Curry-Klay-Iggy-Barnes-Green. Draymond was NOT Bron's primary assignment, he was TT's assignment more than anything.
But the Cavs switched a ton. Go on a shot-by-shot basis, and Green drove by Lebron once and hit a three when Lebron didn't get through a screen. That's it. He scored 3 times each when guarded by TT and JR, and once each guarded by Jefferson, Shump, and Irving.
Lebron prolly spent more time guarding Draymond than any other player during that series. The put him on Draymond to slow his playmaking. Now to guard Curry and Klay they incorporated a lot of switching, but just because Bron was slotted at the sf doesn't mean Green wasn't his main assignment.
Other than that bullshyt about Green being Bron's defensive responsibility in Game 7, you just straight up went of points for that whole
rant?
Rant?
.......Look below at what you wrote.....
It's like defense, rebounding, and setting up teammates didn't even exist for you.
Game 1: Kyrie was ass
Yes he was, but Bron wasn't much better.....Whole team was ass game 1.
Game 2: Kyrie was ass
Bron was equally ass 19 point, on 7-17 shooting, with 7 turnovers
Try again!!
Game 3: Talking about Kyrie being the main factor in the 1st quarter in Game 3, as if GS didn't cut that lead down to 7 by the 2nd quarter and don't go on huge runs all the time. Lebron's the one who put the game out of reach in the 3rd quarter with scoring. But they both had strong all-around games.
They did, but Kyrie took the pressure out of the game by getting them going early. When they "needed" a bucket, it was Kyrie getting it for them. That game was never really tight, and a lot of it has to do with Kyrie getting off to that good start. That doesn't take anything away from Bron, but Kyrie was more impressive offensively.
Game 4: You say Lebron had a bad game because of 7 turnovers, when he went 25-13-9 on 11-21 shooting and was all over the place on defense (2 steals and 3 blocks). You ignore that Curry went off for 38 points on Kyrie in that game. And you talk about Lebron being poor down the stretch, as if Kyrie didn't shoot 3-9 (no threes) without a single assist in the last 8 minutes. So, let me get this straight.
You said earlier that the Cavs were doing a bunch of switching, but now your gonna try and say Curry hung all 38 on Irving?
You reaching. You don't consider a 7 turnover game in the playoffs where you loose a close game a bad game? Even Bron said after the game it was his fault and he would need to be better. Cut down on 3 of those turnovers, and they may end up winning that game. He played so poorly and out of character, that he literally pushed Curry out of frustration, and tried to step over Draymond, both of which were completely out of his character, or at least what he portrays.
Game 5: You call it a "toss-up" because you think Irving had an edge offensively, even though they both scored 41 (more assists for Lebron, more turnovers for Kyrie), and Lebron was a MONSTER on the boards and defense (16 boards, 3 blocks, 3 steals, Warriors frontcourt went 9-36 for the game).
LOL....Wait, you mean Draymond Green, Andrew Bogut, and Festus Ezeli Boy Stop!!!!! I don't even need to touch on the Warriors Frontcourt offensively, because I aint even talking about defense/rebounding...And Kyrie was 17-24 for 41 points. They tried running everybody they could at him, and he still shot 17-24 getting any and everything he wanted. After the game the Dubs talked about needing to limit Kyrie not Bron. I mean, you can go back and watch the game and see for yourself who was more impressive offensively.
Game 6: Lebron was a monster on both ends again, as you admit. 3rd game where Lebron was undeniably better.
I agree, but Lebron was undeniably better the entire series. I'm speaking strictly about offense. I wouldn't even attempt to compare their total impact to each other. I watch the games too.
Game 7: Lebron was better all game again. He was the guy the offense revolved around (11 assists to Kyrie's 1 assist) and he was the center of the defense (2 steals and 3 blocks, and held Barnes/Iggy to 5-16 shooting while scaring Curry from even thinking about the lane all game). And acting like Lebron wasn't about the moment was bullshyt - Lebron scored 9 of the last 12 for the Cavs, including a huge 3 and 3-3 free throws on a huge fouled three, not to mention the block. Kyrie doesn't get the game ball for making one fukking shot - that's what he's supposed to do.
Kyrie's game isn't assists. Anybody who watches the games knows this. He's elite at what he does, which is score from every level on the floor. Lebron's been a playmaker his entire career. And your reaching with the 5-16 shooting, because everybody watched Barnes miss open shot, after open shot, and Iggy is a streaky shooter at best. No doubt he had Curry scared to enter the lane. The block was amazing, which set up Kyrie's shot, but the last 3 minutes of the game was sloppy, and nobody had scored for a few possessions before Kyrie hit that 3. Bron was good enough that you shouldn't have to stretch the truth to try and prove a point.
Lebron was clearly better in 4 games and had the edge in two more, with the last being a toss up. Kyrie wasn't the most
important Cav on both ends in even one game.
... Where did I try and make that argument?
I swear, ya'all won't give Lebron his credit unless he is the best player on both sides of the ball in every game, leads all players in scoring, assists, rebounds, blocks, and steals, and dominates in the fourth quarters while his team wins the series.
Oh, wait, ya still trying to make up shyt even if he do all dat.
