I own places outright...no mortgage and it allows me to have more money as a result. You can't "have money" while also not have enough to actually own...that's offsetting shyt. Because if you had money, you wouldn't still owe.
The greatest marketing scheme ever created by the banking system is tricking suckers into thinking they own something when they are just renting from the bank with mortgage payments. The bank doesn’t even want to own anything that’s for suckers instead the power comes from control. You want to control and leverage things not necessarily own them.
exactly dog... I'm 34 now when I was younger people had me all confused cause they arent labeling shyt right ... and its the vast majority being too prideful because they think thats the only way. So they use these buzzwords to pretend they have actual ownership.
I guess its like ICE-T said when he came out, he was owning and buying ferrari's and shyt... he didnt know cats were just borrowing them. If you miss a payment and they foreclose or repossess your shyt, you aint really own it.
Unfortunately for most people that's what ownership feels like so its normal. That's why OP is more right than wrong... in that sense. Cash does save and free you more than anything... but utilizing the cash to how you beautiful said "escaping from the mafia that is the bank" is what you need to get to
the results of how you get there work different for everyone, so there's no real answer.... you just have to obtain ownership ASAP so you can have stability, ownership and more money all at once. All these people are arguing the best way to
borrow money and thats never a complete flex. Cant have actual ownership without money, and cant have maximum money without actual ownership. They go hand in hand cause until you pay your shyt off, you are stuck with neither.