What's wrong with that? People shouldn't have the right to choose when u can or can't talk to them?
I dont see it as being any different than those "Amnesty International" people who stand on the sidewalk on some "do u care about children" bullshyt. If someone doesnt want u to talk to them they have that right.
I dont either, if they make it clear they want u to talk to them. The nikka
@Wild self cosigning u thinks if women dont accept a man's advances they deserve whatever violent reaction the man has to them.

Now I know u are no ass getting thirst ball, what "dime" is walking around NYC flashing her t*ts? This isnt a realistic or logical analogy. And yea, just because she is flashing her t*ts doesnt mean shes down to fukk, a lot of those broads in the clubs in tight dresses and shyt just like the attn from thirsty nikkas. shyt for the last few summers there have been feminist type broads riding bikes in the summer topless... those are the kinds of chicks behind these laws, its just about self-victimization and attention whoring.
Most importantly though, again, I have nothing against street game and I think the law is stupid and racist, but yall nikkas need to stop crying and adjust your game. U nikkas are more riled up about being able to holla at a chick on the street than shyt like police brutality, what part of the game is that.