So HHH couldn't do the job for Sting ....Huh

[R=G]

The year 2003. Check it out. He's absolutely terrible every single show.

 

[mikishere]

these nerds in here basically wanted triple H to lose every wrestling feud he was ever in

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

these nerds in here basically wanted triple H to lose every wrestling feud he was ever in

I mean yeah I think sting should've won but these guys are salty

 

[bsmooth]

 

[TL15]

4 pages in and no one mentions this

 

[Truth200]

 

[RammerJammer]

The year 2003. Check it out. He's absolutely terrible every single show.

I noticed the attendance was low on RAW then

 

[mrken12]

I noticed the attendance was low on RAW then

Kind of like how Shawn Michaels and Diesel were killing the attendance numbers and revenue when they were on top.

 

[Pinyapplesuckas]

Triple H was my most hated wrestler for years..but now i see the light. he's aight with me. i get what it is that he does and he's great at it for the most part.

 

[Art Barr]

Let me clarify HHH is the worst major "Star" ever.

He's a good wrestler on the level of guys like Lord Steven Regal ect...

He is nowhere near as good as regal in any capacity.
if we gave regal the content that hhh has had.
it would be otherworldly.


Art Barr

 

[hayesc0]

 

[Momentum]

Going over Brock, Booker, Goldberg, Sting, and CM Punk is inexcusable

:umaaad:

 

[Momentum]

:bestforbusiness:

 

[Ill Lou Malnati]

Going over Brock, Booker, Goldberg, Sting, and CM Punk is inexcusable

He and Goldberg broke even in that feud, IMO. Goldberg won, then HHH won.

The Booker, Sting and Punk shyt is awful. This is why he has a rep for putting no one over -- because he goes over when it's crucial that he doesn't. Those guys HAD to win. And they didn't. The only time I can remember in recent memory where the guy HAD to win, and he did, was DB.

 

[Box Cutta]