Concerning VIolence
Decolonizer
All of you believe in God but sin more on the daily than atheists.
I’ve pointed out many of your contradictions in other threads and your only replies are ad hominem and strawman attack/rebuttals
I didn't get the memo. It seems that on the coli atheism = woke or intelligent. But that shyt really doesn't mean anything. And I'm not knocking those who don't believe in Christianity(which is fine as well) but people who believe in nothing. The their is no God set. Why is that regarded as wisdom or being intelligent? I don't believe in the Christian God or Muhammad etc..But I believe in intelligent design? Hell numerous people do, but I don't see people saying that makes us look smarter. I'm just asking.
Lol I s too easy.yeah, i'd actually like to watch you defend the bible claiming there are 500 year old humans who built arks with every animal on earth
you might embarrass yourself, but it wont be with your intellect
..........And like clockwork.
I didn't get the memo. It seems that on the coli atheism = woke or intelligent. But that shyt really doesn't mean anything. And I'm not knocking those who don't believe in Christianity(which is fine as well) but people who believe in nothing. The their is no God set. Why is that regarded as wisdom or being intelligent? I don't believe in the Christian God or Muhammad etc..But I believe in intelligent design? Hell numerous people do, but I don't see people saying that makes us look smarter. I'm just asking.
The idea that atheism = woke or intellectual is a fairly new concept brought about through 21 century militant atheism or what is called/termed the “new atheism” by Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris.
Unfortunately their debates always delve into snide remarks or crass jokes whenver they are pitted into a corner for their illogical contradictions.
It’s nothing more than a group think bully tactic to shame people into believing that somehow atheism is intellectually a more coherent starting point when examining the material universe.
However the main fallacy in that starting point is that one must begin with an a priori assumption about the universe without accepting or taking into account what is clearly seen.
As a matter of fact these verses sum it up perfectly.
Romans 1:19-22
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
SkepticismI didn't get the memo. It seems that on the coli atheism = woke or intelligent. But that shyt really doesn't mean anything. And I'm not knocking those who don't believe in Christianity(which is fine as well) but people who believe in nothing. The their is no God set. Why is that regarded as wisdom or being intelligent? I don't believe in the Christian God or Muhammad etc..But I believe in intelligent design? Hell numerous people do, but I don't see people saying that makes us look smarter. I'm just asking.
Lamar Just sinned he say he would explain and embarrass people who don't believe archaic people could live up to 500 and live inside of whales. Now he's juelzing. What happen to 1 Peter 3:15? Be ready to defend your ideology when asked. How you afriad of a few Romans Lamar?
Here's how an atheist determines how the universe is made...
They go measure the shyt...
Here's how a fundamentalist religious person...determine how the universe was made...
They go read a 500 year old book...about people that walked around in the desert...
All of you believe in God but sin more on the daily than atheists.
Like Christians don't bully peopleThe idea that atheism = woke or intellectual is a fairly new concept brought about through 21 century militant atheism or what is called/termed the “new atheism” by Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris.
Unfortunately their debates always delve into snide remarks or crass jokes whenver they are pitted into a corner for their illogical contradictions.
It’s nothing more than a group think bully tactic to shame people into believing that somehow atheism is intellectually a more coherent starting point when examining the material universe.
However the main fallacy in that starting point is that one must begin with an a priori assumption about the universe without accepting or taking into account what is clearly seen.
As a matter of fact these verses sum it up perfectly.
Romans 1:19-22
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
How could archaic human beings live for multiple centuries according to your doctrine? You said you would address it earlier and even went as far to say you would embarrass someone who didn't believe that as well.Do me a favor and ask one question at a time in a logical sentence and I will answer.