I'm confused, if the congressman was able to forge the checks, doesn't that mean signatures mean very little and can be duplicated?
Idk how showing how easy it is to forge a signature is a plus to signatures being a unique identifier.
Hence notaries and systems in place to combat forgery in banks.
I was genuinely asking a question so I may be off but I'm kinda confused on how a congressman forging a signature is somehow proof a signature is important. Rather than having systems in place to counteract fraudulent withdrawals and transfers.
Is your signature really that unique that if I really tried with a copy in front of me or used as tracing that I wouldn't be able to replicate it close enough for nobody to notice?
Edit: I was actually wrong on this, and forensic handwriting is still practicable.
Goddamn @concise, now you really got me curious about this shyt. I might have to rethink my signature or at least look into this more. I actually never thought more into it outside of practicable usages considering the rare usages of them, at least with me and my life.

Two of These Mail Ballot Signatures Are by the Same Person. Which Ones? (Published 2020)
How election officials vet voter signatures based on slants, sizes and loops.
www.nytimes.com
Signature verification is definitely a real thing, especially when it comes it voting, financials, and legals.
and you can find several youtube videos on how to forge more effectively (for entertainment purposes only, of course)