ApolloStark
All Star
This is why having them old cds/mp3s is important guys. Nobody wants to hear the Walmart versions of their favorite songs
Oh shyt they did Teddy foul on that
So Jojo Really Had To Re-Record Her First Two Albums To Be Able To Stream?
- Thread starter DapMeUp!
- Start date
-
- Tags
- jojo label problems
Oh shyt they did Teddy foul on that
Re-records usually sound worst than the original imo
what!
this sounds disgraceful. Washed up DMX doing a karaoke version of his own shyt over a beat that sounds like a YouTube remake on FL Studio.
these artists can’t even recreate their own vibe in a controlled studio environment.
Playaz Eyez
Veteran
One of the various downfalls of streaming despite it’s good things. Don’t know how many times I’ve heard a beat just suddenly be different with no explanation at all.
Last edited:
Excellenceofelegance
All Star
Can somebody explain how this re-recording stuff works what happeneds if the artist didn’t write the song would this re-record be double pay for the original songwriter ?
ApolloStark
All Star
To be fair expecting an artist to recreate something similar in vibe to some shyt they did over 20y ago is a tall order
Add to the fact this is DMX we're taking about...
Noone said anything at all about CDs smh
I own 2 160 gb ipods
One has 35k+ songs on it and it isnt full
The other one is empty
GPBear
The Tape Crusader
music industry stupidity #1294u3u12938018 
to Jojo tho, that's a smart move. I wonder if other artists can do similar stuff. 
to Jojo tho, that's a smart move. I wonder if other artists can do similar stuff. 
Mike the Executioner
What went on up there? Poppers and weird sex!
When EPMD released their greatest hits album in 1999, they had to re-record the songs they wanted to include from their first two albums, because the masters weren't owned by Def Jam.
I don't think it's a bad idea to re-record old songs, especially if you put out the original song when you were really young. You could do it with an improved voice, add some new arrangements, change up some of the lyrics that didn't make sense before. Just don't wait to do it when you're and don't have the chops anymore.
Also, I know I'm alone here, but this version >>>>>>>>>> the original:
I don't think it's a bad idea to re-record old songs, especially if you put out the original song when you were really young. You could do it with an improved voice, add some new arrangements, change up some of the lyrics that didn't make sense before. Just don't wait to do it when you're
and don't have the chops anymore.Also, I know I'm alone here, but this version >>>>>>>>>> the original:
Don'tCallMeLuckyB
Veteran
Re-records usually sound worst than the original imo
what!
Slippin re recorded is so unbearable as well
Dynamite James
The Main attraction
When EPMD released their greatest hits album in 1999, they had to re-record the songs they wanted to include from their first two albums, because the masters weren't owned by Def Jam.
I don't think it's a bad idea to re-record old songs, especially if you put out the original song when you were really young. You could do it with an improved voice, add some new arrangements, change up some of the lyrics that didn't make sense before. Just don't wait to do it when you're
Also, I know I'm alone here, but this version >>>>>>>>>> the original:
No to that version of hip hop hooray breh
Dynamite James
The Main attraction
Slippin re recorded is so unbearable as well
Cheese McNair
Bought it this morning, drive it like I stole it
But you gotta buy the songs, right? Unless you d/l illegally, which is fine.
MaxBundles
Veteran
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's due to the fact that the label own that specific master of the song, that specific recording of it and not the actual lyrics itself.
So in theory you could replay/recreate the instrumental of the song, re-record the whole song from scratch and you can own that version.