That's why you never go by intuition but use facts instead breh. Of their wins (64) only, Curry wasn't his team's leading scorer 21 times, 19 of which were Klay. There were also several games where he wasn't even the second leading scorer. Another game he and Curry were tied for points but Klay had the better overall game. That means at least 22 times (over quarter of a season and more than a third of their total wins) Curry wasn't their sole leading scorer. And that's not even looking at games where Curry only had a few more points than the second leading scorer and the games where Draymond had a crazy all around performance contributing everywhere. Like I said, you can argue that for about half of their wins (32) Curry wasn't the one who most contributed to the w. Basically you only need 11 games where despite leading the team in scoring, Draymond or someone else arguably did more than Curry across the board. Given Draymond's huge impact and a few games where Iguodala and a few others had a key impact on the game, this is not far-fetched at all but rather a fair assessment. We all know Curry's never their best defender. He's also not leading the team in assists, Draymond is. While Curry may draw double teams which help his team mates get open, you can't say Curry is more responsible for the w in cases where Klay outscores him and plays better d than him. In any case, Curry relies heavily on Bogut and Draymond to get many of his buckets too. Overall, Curry is not the kind of player who still contributed the most to a win when he's not leading the team in scoring. Draymond, on the other hand, is almost the definition of such a player.
Fatigue will not be accepted as an excuse becuz he's sat out what 18 or something 4th quarters. That's damn near 5 games worth of 4th quarters.
if they meet in the first round it will be a quick sweep, would rather see jazz making there, might be one game with the fukkery
