So the mystery of ufos, demons, aliens, bigfoot is solved. It's worst than imagined brehs...

[Chrishaune]

what y’all think of remote viewing?

And do yall think we got guardian angels?

In the sense that you hear in worldly stories about guardian angels I don't know if it's quite like that, but yes people are protected by angels as long as they keep acknowledging GOD.

I think the separation of realms allows angels to step into time (mortality) at specific points. Good and evil angels. So you always have to be aware of that.

If one angel can kill hundreds of thousands of men in the Bible, then 1 can also protect thousands, at least, at 1 time you would have to think.

Then you think about what the Bible says about the 4 evil angels released in Chapter 6 of Revelation. They kill billions of people.

Angels like the archangel Michael protect whole nations.

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

 

[Ty Daniels]

I mentioned in my OP that this is still in the realm of pseudology. That's the difference between me and these flaming pseudos who think black Indians popped out the ground fully formed, with no genetic ties to Africa.

I have my pseudo sides, im just not pseudolicious.

Breh, you too often are full of shyt with your "takes".


There has been multiple posts where I posted peer reviewed data, and general scientific/historical data about non-African "Black Eurasians" and Green Saharan African origin Black African Ancient Egyptians.

What did you do?

Pretend like I was posting "Pseudo" shyt, even dapped some stupid clueless muthafukka, who said that "Some times the Egyptians Were Arabs" which is some dumb ass anachronistic anti-evidence retard shyt.



The bottom line is YOU reject any information coming from Black Folks, and automatically assume it is wrong, EVEN WHEN the data is coming from Peer Reviewed, evidence based sources.

On the other hand, damn near anybody White can say some shyt, and I don't see any claims of "Pseudo" by you.

It's "C00N LOGIC".

You also conflate "Talking Points" together nobody made, Strawmanning them and purposely LYING about their positions.

Which you just did a few post ago, where you are trying to make it seem like a poster whose username is Afram Glory, is trying to deny African Origins, when literally his username is "African American Glory"

You consistently do shyt like this, while having the muthafukkin nerve to claim somebody else is "Pseudo", SMH.

So it is either piss-poor intellectual and reading comprehension and non-deductive reasoning on your part, or just flat-out Lying and C00NING.



Your position 9 times out of 10 is:

- "Black People Wrong".
- "White people Right".

It's "C00N LOGIC".

 

[King_Kamala61]

I'm running this through ChatGPT to see what it says brb

 

[King_Kamala61]

 

[Diunx]

what y’all think of remote viewing?

And do yall think we got guardian angels?

How the fukk can anyone ask this in the world we live in

 

[Dzali OG]

Breh, you too often are full of shyt with your "takes".


There has been multiple posts where I posted peer reviewed data, and general scientific/historical data about non-African "Black Eurasians" and Green Saharan African origin Black African Ancient Egyptians.

What did you do?

Pretend like I was posting "Pseudo" shyt, even dapped some stupid clueless muthafukka, who said that "Some times the Egyptians Were Arabs" which is some dumb ass anachronistic anti-evidence retard shyt.



The bottom line is YOU reject any information coming from Black Folks, and automatically assume it is wrong, EVEN WHEN the data is coming from Peer Reviewed, evidence based sources.

On the other hand, damn near anybody White can say some shyt, and I don't see any claims of "Pseudo" by you.

It's "C00N LOGIC".

You also conflate "Talking Points" together nobody made, Strawmanning them and purposely LYING about their positions.

Which you just did a few post ago, where you are trying to make it seem like a poster whose username is Afram Glory, is trying to deny African Origins, when literally his username is "African American Glory"

You consistently do shyt like this, while having the muthafukkin nerve to claim somebody else is "Pseudo", SMH.

So it is either piss-poor intellectual and reading comprehension and non-deductive reasoning on your part, or just flat-out Lying and C00NING.



Your position 9 times out of 10 is:

- "Black People Wrong".
- "White people Right".

It's "C00N LOGIC".

I guess you missed in my OP where I said this falls in the realm of pseudo. And even in what you quoted, I mentioned this would be classified as PSEUDO.

That's the difference in us, I can admit when there isn't evidence. If there isn't any scientific evidence IT IS PSEUDO.

And I'll be quick to admit, I don't want to hear shyt from a nygga unless he has peer-reviewed info!

We've had enough young pharaohs, nature boys, polite, malachi York, in our community.

Like it or not, it's cacs out there digging and finding this information. While nyggas sit in their spare bedroom or basement...going over those guys work trying to interpret what they want to get from it.

 

[Yaboysix]

The ORIGINAL "Big foot" came out YEARS ago and said it was just a prank, filmed by him and a friend... The whole town knew about and had a little chuckle about it and everything. They knew the whole time!

If the OG bigfoot nygga in the God damn SUIT told you it was just a joke, the Fck y'all think Bigfoot is?

 

[doublecheese]

Nah Aiwass was an entity Crowley claimed to have summoned. It was a voice he allegedly heard, and claimed to be Lucifer. I don’t think he ever physically described it since it was just a voice.

Crowley was a literal fakkit and a charlatan.

 

[Ty Daniels]

I guess you missed in my OP where I said this falls in the realm of pseudo. And even in what you quoted, I mentioned this would be classified as PSEUDO.

That's the difference in us, I can admit when there isn't evidence. If there isn't any scientific evidence IT IS PSEUDO.

And I'll be quick to admit, I don't want to hear shyt from a nygga unless he has peer-reviewed info!

We've had enough young pharaohs, nature boys, polite, malachi York, in our community.

Like it or not, it's cacs out there digging and finding this information. While nyggas sit in their spare bedroom or basement...going over those guys work trying to interpret what they want to get from it.

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT????????

The difference between "You and Me" is I ACTUALLY FOLLOW THE DATA FROM PEER REVIEWED SOURCES,

You REJECT INFO BASED UPON THE MELANIN CONTENT AND PHENOTYPE OF THE PERSON.

THAT'S C00N SHYT!




Either your LACK of READING COMPREHENSION is kicking in or you are purposefully straw-manning, conflating and LYING AGAIN.

I mentioned that I POSTED PEER REVIEWED DATA from "CACS" as you put it, BUT YOU STILL ACT LIKE IT IS Just some made up bullshyt,
because a Black Man repeated it, and your LACK of knowledge of the subject won't allow you to refute it.

C00N SHYT!


There AIN'T SHYT I said about Ancient history or Human origins, that is "PSEUDO".
AND EVERYTHING I'VE STATED Is based upon actual "CAC" Peer Reviewed Mainstream Science/Academia.

But you LACK DISCERNMENT And CLEARLY LACK CRITICAL Thinking Skills, otherwise you are just LYING.



You are on that Anti-Black, "The Whiteman's Ice Is Colder" C00N Shyt.

I state for a FACT that their AIN'T shyt that I posted about Ancient History that is "Pseudo".


The bottom line is YOU CLEARLY Have NOT studied Ancient History and are CLUELESS about what Mainstream Academia says about Ancient History.

You dapped a Certified GOOFIE who claimed the Ancient Egyptians were "Sometimes Arabs",
you are CLUELESS Like a Muthafukka about what actual Mainstream Academia AKA "CACs" has to say about ancient history.

So instead of being able to refute the data, you LAZILY just claim people are "Pseudo", which allows you to PRETEND like you are "In the Know", when it is clear as fukk that you don't know shyt about ancient history.

---

That is the "Difference" between you and me, I follow the data, you reject data/information based upon if the person saying it is Black or Not.

C00N AZZ, CLOWN Shyt.

Even you bringing up "Young Pharaohs, Nature Boys, Polite, Malachi York", while not acknowledging that there are equivalent "Cacs" that have a equal history of "Pseudo" bullshyt, betrays your UNCLE RUCKUS azz fukked up mentality.

 

[Dzali OG]

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT????????

The difference between "You and Me" is I ACTUALLY FOLLOW THE DATA FROM PEER REVIEWED SOURCES,

You REJECT INFO BASED UPON THE MELANIN CONTENT AND PHENOTYPE OF THE PERSON.

THAT'S C00N SHYT!




Either your LACK of READING COMPREHENSION is kicking in or you are purposefully straw-manning, conflating and LYING AGAIN.

I mentioned that I POSTED PEER REVIEWED DATA from "CACS" as you put it, BUT YOU STILL ACT LIKE IT IS Just some made up bullshyt,
because a Black Man repeated it, and your LACK of knowledge of the subject won't allow you to refute it.

C00N SHYT!


There AIN'T SHYT I said about Ancient history or Human origins, that is "PSEUDO".
AND EVERYTHING I'VE STATED Is based upon actual "CAC" Peer Reviewed Mainstream Science/Academia.

But you LACK DISCERNMENT And CLEARLY LACK CRITICAL Thinking Skills, otherwise you are just LYING.



You are on that Anti-Black, "The Whiteman's Ice Is Colder" C00N Shyt.

I state for a FACT that their AIN'T shyt that I posted about Ancient History that is "Pseudo".


The bottom line is YOU CLEARLY Have NOT studied Ancient History and are CLUELESS about what Mainstream Academia says about Ancient History.

You dapped a Certified GOOFIE who claimed the Ancient Egyptians were "Sometimes Arabs",
you are CLUELESS Like a Muthafukka about what actual Mainstream Academia AKA "CACs" has to say about ancient history.

So instead of being able to refute the data, you LAZILY just claim people are "Pseudo", which allows you to PRETEND like you are "In the Know", when it is clear as fukk that you don't know shyt about ancient history.

---

That is the "Difference" between you and me, I follow the data, you reject data/information based upon if the person saying it is Black or Not.

C00N AZZ, CLOWN Shyt.

Even you bringing up "Young Pharaohs, Nature Boys, Polite, Malachi York", while not acknowledging that there are equivalent "Cacs" that have a equal history of "Pseudo" bullshyt, betrays your UNCLE RUCKUS azz fukked up mentality.

Firstly, I scarcely remember the thread you're referring too. I know the bare minimum of history...I give a fukk about history!

You would have to refresh my memory on that shyt. I think it was about Egypt being black.

My stance on that is, the ancient Egyptians more than likely were black as they came from the south.

However, Egypt grew in to a metropolitan over time. It's right there at the crossroads. So of course it would eventually be mixed. Just as Texas is mixed with Mexicans now. That's only logical.

Perhaps calling them Arab is in error, they look Arab to me. Actually I call all them people over there Arabs...even tho I know there are several ethnicities there. In actuality you can see they are simply that east African phenotype mixed with Mediterranean and Arab.

As for calling your source pseudo...it must have been lanky imo. But like I said, I really gaf about history.

 

[Dzali OG]

Oh and the white man's ice is colder. Just being honest . Half the time our store ice box open or not working.

 

[Ty Daniels]

Firstly, I scarcely remember the thread you're referring too. I know the bare minimum of history...I give a fukk about history!

You would have to refresh my memory on that shyt. I think it was about Egypt being black.

My stance on that is, the ancient Egyptians more than likely were black as they came from the south.

However, Egypt grew in to a metropolitan over time. It's right there at the crossroads. So of course it would eventually be mixed. Just as Texas is mixed with Mexicans now. That's only logical.

Perhaps calling them Arab is in error, they look Arab to me. Actually I call all them people over there Arabs...even tho I know there are several ethnicities there. In actuality you can see they are simply that east African phenotype mixed with Mediterranean and Arab.

As for calling your source pseudo...it must have been lanky imo. But like I said, I really gaf about history.

Every post you expose your lack of knowledge and LAZY azz "Talking Points".

You don't EVEN Know enough about the subject to "Refute" it and sure the HELL don't know enough about it to claim it is "Pseudo"

Just CLOWN SHYT, SMH

You HAVE ZERO Business tying to "Refute" any God-Damn body on ANY SUBJECT, YOU STATED YOURSELF YOU ARE CLUELESS ABOUT and Don't Give AF about Especially History



The Fukkin ARROGANCE of you.

My sources were NOT "Lanky" SMH, EVERYTHING I posted was from MAINSTREAM Sources.

You don't even know enough to recognize an actual Peer-Reviewed source.

Probably couldn't even outline where to even find a actual Peer-Reviewed source, SMH.

But your CLUELESS Azz decided that it was "Pseudo" just because I'm Black.

C00N SHYT.

And Ancient Egyptians remained PRIMARILY Phenotypically Black Africans all the way up until the Greco-Roman occupation.

They were NEVER Arabs, NOR DID THEY LOOK like "Arabs", they were Nile Valley Africans with primary Origins in the Green Sahara and the Sudan.

That is what the "Peer Review" says.

"Arabs" and "Looking Like Arabs" is some DUMB SHYT that you made up based upon your complete lack of fukking knowledge about the subject.


Bottom line is your azz is C00NING

 

[Dzali OG]

Every post you expose your lack of knowledge and LAZY azz "Talking Points".

You don't EVEN Know enough about the subject to "Refute" it and sure the HELL don't know enough about it to claim it is "Pseudo"

Just CLOWN SHYT, SMH

You HAVE ZERO Business tying to "Refute" any God-Damn body on ANY SUBJECT, YOU STATED YOURSELF YOU ARE CLUELESS ABOUT and Don't Give AF about Especially History



The Fukkin ARROGANCE of you.

My sources were NOT "Lanky" SMH, EVERYTHING I posted was from MAINSTREAM Sources.

You don't even know enough to recognize an actual Peer-Reviewed source.

Probably couldn't even outline where to even find a actual Peer-Reviewed source, SMH.

But your CLUELESS Azz decided that it was "Pseudo" just because I'm Black.

C00N SHYT.

And Ancient Egyptians remained PRIMARILY Phenotypically Black Africans all the way up until the Greco-Roman occupation.

They were NEVER Arabs, NOR DID THEY LOOK like "Arabs", they were Nile Valley Africans with primary Origins in the Green Sahara and the Sudan.

That is what the "Peer Review" says.

"Arabs" and "Looking Like Arabs" is some DUMB SHYT that you made up based upon your complete lack of fukking knowledge about the subject.


Bottom line is your azz is C00NING

breh wtf...I mean really WTF...

How long ago was that fukkin thread?

Im going have to go reread that shyt now the way you're crying and bytching in my thread.

nikka have you been to the middle east? I have and call them all ARABS, just like I call anyone not black a fukkin crakka.

If I made comment at that time, it just so happens tgere was a debate war going on sa neter channel about that very channel. With hoteps hollering kmt was black while the otherside who I mostly agreed with maintain kmt was mixed alot later on.

As I said I GIVE TWO SHYTS about this BULLSHYT. I don't GIVE A fukk bout no 3,000 year old Arab-nikkas.

Now lemme go find that thread cause you've mildly irritated me, and see if I was on bullshyt...or if I a layman will school you in that shyt...

 

[Dzali OG]

Oh, and the white man's ice is still colder!