I AM WE ARE
Banned
What makes you book better than the other
So wait, it's a sin to read multiple religiousbooks?
- Thread starter I AM WE ARE
- Start date
I AM WE ARE
Banned
Both Abraham based religions am I correct? Where the divide come from? Not to mention neither can agree within itself(Christians v Christians, etc) about the same book and belief. Imo this is all about perception. How you recieve a book or message will be different than me
I AM WE ARE
Banned
Had one friend talk to me about this and soon as he said"well the Honorable Elijah Muhammad" I stopped him and said"was this before or after he impregnated those Lil girls"
Being very familiar with it for a while now, I know a man or a collection of men is not capable of providing that info. Have you dealt with the contents and implications? Do you know anything it’s saying?? No??I guess you believe the boom just mysterious appeared like they claim.
you’re a fool like I said
Chrishaune
Veteran
He is just presenting the information.
I grew up in the church around "Christians".
I wish I knew before I got out of high school what he put in these books. They don't teach you this stuff in school especially public schools, because the government and schools have been influenced by "the voices" that I talked about. Now the government has intimidated a lot of churches from telling you the truth.
You have to work to know what you need to know in this world. It ain't easy.
When you start getting the right information, then the path you need to take becomes clearer.
Prince.Skeletor
Don’t Be Like He-Man
What?
In Islam you are not allowed to go to church or any place of faith that isn’t Muslim.
Freedman
Choppers For Karate Nggas
I Think the differences between the Abrahamic religions is that in Judaism anything after The Old Testament is duck tales, In Christianity Jesus is the last Prophet and in Islam Muhammad is the last Prophet
Being very familiar with it for a while now, I know a man or a collection of men is not capable of providing that info. Have you dealt with the contents and implications? Do you know anything it’s saying?? No??
you’re a fool like I said
Examples of criticisms regarding the science in The Urantia Book include:
- The described formation of the solar system is consistent with the Chamberlin-Moulton planetesimal hypothesis,[103] which though popular in the early part of the 20th century, was discarded by the 1940s after major flaws were noted.[104] The currently accepted scientific explanation for the origin of the solar system is based on the nebular hypothesis.[103]
- According to the book's descriptions, the universe is hundreds of billions of years old and periodically expands and contracts — "respires" — at 2-billion-year intervals. Recent observations measure the true age of the universe to be 13.8 billion years.[105] The book does not support the Big Bang theory.[106]
- A fundamental particle called an "ultimaton" is proposed, with an electron being composed of 100 ultimatons. The particle is not known to be described anywhere else and the concept is at odds with modern particle physics.[107]
- The Andromeda Galaxy is claimed to be "almost one million" light years away, repeating a systematic mistake in the measurements of the distance to galaxies made in the 1920s.[108] The galaxy is now known to be 2.5 million light years away.
- The book repeats the mistaken idea that planets close to a sun will gradually spin slower until one hemisphere is left always turned to the sun due to tidal locking, citing Mercury as an example. Scientists at the time of the book's origin thought one side of Mercury always faced the sun, just as one side of the Moon always faces the Earth. In 1965, radio astronomers discovered however that Mercury rotates fast enough for all sides to see exposure to the sun.[106] Scientists further established that Mercury is locked in this spin rate in a stable resonance of 3 spins for every 2 orbits, and it is not slowing and so will never have one side left always turned to the sun.[109]
- Some species are said to have evolved suddenly from single mutations without transitional species.[110] The theory originated with Dutch botanist Hugo De Vries but was short-lived and is not now supported.[111]
- The book erroneously says that a solar eclipse was predicted in 1808 by the Native American prophet Tenskwatawa. The eclipse actually was predicted in late April 1806 and occurred on June 16, 1806.[112] In 2009, the Urantia Foundation acknowledged the error and revised the book.[c]
- Controversial statements about human races can be found in the book.[114] Gardner recounts that William S. Sadler also wrote eugenicist works that contain similar arguments to some ideas presented in The Urantia Book.[115]
Defend a book written by damn cac eugenists
I AM WE ARE
Banned
But you can read the Bible?
There are surahs that call the Bible the light
I AM WE ARE
Banned
Doesn't 5% believe white people were made in a lab?Examples of criticisms regarding the science in The Urantia Book include:
- The described formation of the solar system is consistent with the Chamberlin-Moulton planetesimal hypothesis,[103] which though popular in the early part of the 20th century, was discarded by the 1940s after major flaws were noted.[104] The currently accepted scientific explanation for the origin of the solar system is based on the nebular hypothesis.[103]
- According to the book's descriptions, the universe is hundreds of billions of years old and periodically expands and contracts — "respires" — at 2-billion-year intervals. Recent observations measure the true age of the universe to be 13.8 billion years.[105] The book does not support the Big Bang theory.[106]
- A fundamental particle called an "ultimaton" is proposed, with an electron being composed of 100 ultimatons. The particle is not known to be described anywhere else and the concept is at odds with modern particle physics.[107]
- The Andromeda Galaxy is claimed to be "almost one million" light years away, repeating a systematic mistake in the measurements of the distance to galaxies made in the 1920s.[108] The galaxy is now known to be 2.5 million light years away.
- The book repeats the mistaken idea that planets close to a sun will gradually spin slower until one hemisphere is left always turned to the sun due to tidal locking, citing Mercury as an example. Scientists at the time of the book's origin thought one side of Mercury always faced the sun, just as one side of the Moon always faces the Earth. In 1965, radio astronomers discovered however that Mercury rotates fast enough for all sides to see exposure to the sun.[106] Scientists further established that Mercury is locked in this spin rate in a stable resonance of 3 spins for every 2 orbits, and it is not slowing and so will never have one side left always turned to the sun.[109]
- Some species are said to have evolved suddenly from single mutations without transitional species.[110] The theory originated with Dutch botanist Hugo De Vries but was short-lived and is not now supported.[111]
- The book erroneously says that a solar eclipse was predicted in 1808 by the Native American prophet Tenskwatawa. The eclipse actually was predicted in late April 1806 and occurred on June 16, 1806.[112] In 2009, the Urantia Foundation acknowledged the error and revised the book.[c]
- Controversial statements about human races can be found in the book.[114] Gardner recounts that William S. Sadler also wrote eugenicist works that contain similar arguments to some ideas presented in The Urantia Book.[115]
Defend a book written by damn cac eugenists
Prince.Skeletor
Don’t Be Like He-Man
So you can read the bible but cannot go to places that preaches it despite calling it the light?
If true that’s stupid
I AM WE ARE
Banned
Which confuses me even more.
And further pushes me away from organized religion
I AM WE ARE
Banned
The Qur'an calls the Bible, or parts of the Bible, a light (Sura 5:44, 46), an example (Sura 11:17), and a warning (Sura 17:4). It also states that the authors of the Bible were inspired (Sura 4:163; 5:111).
