So when did being the best loser become more valuable than winning it all?

Lord_Chief_Rocka

Superstar
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
17,727
Reputation
1,490
Daps
50,000
I am literally dumbfounded at this new development on pretty much every basketball message board.

It has pretty much become the consensus opinion that 3-4(7 finals appearances) is a better career achievement than 6-0(6 finals appearances;2 3-peats)
giphy.gif



Can some explain why this is?

Do people believe Lebron woul rather be 3-4 vs 4-0?:dwillhuh:

So did Jim Kelly have a better playoff career than Brett Farve?:dwillhuh:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,215
Reputation
10,157
Daps
240,455
It has pretty much become the consensus opinion that 3-4(7 finals appearances) is a better career achievement than 6-0(6 finals appearances;2 3-peats)
giphy.gif
I don't believe that is the argument at all. The argument is it's better to make the Finals (regardless of win/lose) than not make the Finals at all. Going to the Finals seven times and only winning three titles (3-4) is still a better accomplishment than going to three Finals' and winning them all (3-0). Being 3-0 in the Finals just means you and your team weren't good enough to make it to another FOUR Finals', and lost earlier in the playoffs. It's simple. I don't know why we need to keep going over this.
 

onelastdeath

Banned
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
29,376
Reputation
11,047
Daps
134,981
Ok fine let's include: broken leg season, comeback season, 1 and 1/2 seasons with the Wizards= 6/15

So Bron is 3/13
Right and can retire 7-20 or so potentially

Which is better than 6-15

Not saying he'll win 7

But I don't give credit for losing early.
 

Lord_Chief_Rocka

Superstar
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
17,727
Reputation
1,490
Daps
50,000
I don't believe that is the argument at all. The argument is it's better to make the Finals (regardless of win/lose) than not make the Finals at all. Going to the Finals seven times and only winning three titles (3-4) is still a better accomplishment than going to three Finals and winning them all (3-0). It just means you and your team weren't good enough to make it to another FOUR Finals, and lost earlier in the playoffs. I don't know why we need to keep going over this.
Nope I see 3-4 > 6-0:yeshrug:
 

Gangstar8

Superstar
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
9,667
Reputation
-8,245
Daps
13,654
Right and can retire 7-20 or so potentially

Which is better than 6-15

Not saying he'll win 7

But I don't give credit for losing early.

losing early is not a knock on anybody
its only on lebron
because he is the one who chose to hide in eastern conference all his career
 

onelastdeath

Banned
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
29,376
Reputation
11,047
Daps
134,981
losing early is not a knock on anybody
its only on lebron
because he is the one who chose to hide in eastern conference all his career
He still has to beat the best team to come out of the west every year

It's weird though. I mean 2 of the losses were no mans land. And there are people who lost finals that they were actually favorites in.

07' against the Spurs, that Cavs team had no business being in the finals
And the Warriors without Love and Kyrie

Are two that any player is going to lose in my opinion.

Mavs was inexcusable
Spurs you can't make excuses for, he chose Miami

Still, 3-4 is still excellent, and he can retire with 7 depending on how this all plays out
 
Top