I'm losing my patience for muslims and religious people in general to be honest.For someone who prides themselves on being educated and knowledgeable, this comment is very "interesting" from you @Napoleon
Being a muslim is a choice.
Social Experiment: Canadians React to Ottawa Shooting
- Thread starter Arianne Martell
- Start date
Being a muslim is a choice.
The Odum of Ala Igbo
Hail Biafra!
Funny. I'm losing my patience for bigots.
Bigots? Whats bigoted about my stance?
Religious moderates hate looking in the mirror and I'm tired of having to tolerate their lies.
You're happy when people aren't taking their religions seriously. How is that even remotely reasonable?
The Odum of Ala Igbo
Hail Biafra!
So, you're saying that all individuals who follow a religion are doing it poorly if they're not abusing people or infringing upon others rights while on the other hand secular people who tolerate religion are damaging all of society by allowing them to continue to exist?
What lies are religious people who aren't violently attacking others telling? How is a Buddhist, a Hindu, a Sufi Muslim etc lying to us?
If you truly believe in liberalism (as I expect you do from your previous posts), you would allow a space in the private sphere for people to worship however they choose.
Oh boy. You must be fun at parties.
Yes.
Remember. Religious moderates don't take their religion that seriously. DO these people want medals for NOT killing infidels? What does that say about the religion?
All religions are predicated on aspects of evangelism and conversion. Those who claim to not care are blatantly lying.
Sure. Reluctantly however.
This is an argument predicated on theory
The Odum of Ala Igbo
Hail Biafra!
1. Your statement on all religious people wanting to kill non-believers is predicated on the belief that all religious state this in their texts. Even if you divorce this from the cultural context of 12th century BC Palestine or 7th Century AD Arabia, this is untrue for all faiths. In the present day, has the Pope Francis recently called for the mass-murder of any religious sects?
Your claims insist that all religious faiths now are designed to do this. This is again false.
2. On religions being all about spreading the faith, not too many Jews or Hindus seem keen on spreading their religions. Again, this is false.
* All of your argumentations are baseless generalizations.
If you really are "black", you'd know that religion is a social tool and that tool has caused much sorrow for people, but also great joy for others people during times of hardship such as African-Americans.
Its illegal to randomly drug test outchea
But the winters are ridiculous and cacs errrywhere, stay in the states
It does.
I don't care about cultural context. Its in the book. YOU don't get to proclaim the infallibility of a book that condones such behavior.
Except, its not. Present history in all religions around the world demonstrate this.
False.
Hindus are known for their evangelism. Judaism as well. Inclusion and expansion are very much the goals
fukk accountability for voluntary associations, right?
Joy? You mean the selective interpretation of a book that also validated the very sorrow you want acknowledged?
Stop contradicting yourself. This is getting embarrassing.
For someone who prides themselves on being educated and knowledgeable, this comment is very "interesting" from you @Napoleon
He's all over the place with it. He speaks out against white supremacist propaganda towards black people but completely believes the propaganda towards Muslims.
He hates it when white public figures do something racist but caped EXTRA hard for Justin Bieber when he was caught twice for white supremacist comments or gestures (three times if you count the monkey grafitti drawing but he's still denying that one
). He capes for gay rights but can't see how they're probably bigger white supremacists than straight white people.
the cac mamba
Veteran
who would allah really be happiest with, tho
extremists, or those who dont make the effort to defend him against cartoonists (
)and be honest
The Odum of Ala Igbo
Hail Biafra!
It does.
I don't care about cultural context. Its in the book. YOU don't get to proclaim the infallibility of a book that condones such behavior.
Except, its not. Present history in all religions around the world demonstrate this.
False.
Hindus are known for their evangelism. Judaism as well. Inclusion and expansion are very much the goals
fukk accountability for voluntary associations, right?
Joy? You mean the selective interpretation of a book that also validated the very sorrow you want acknowledged?
Stop contradicting yourself. This is getting embarrassing.
*sigh* Here we go. Another thread in which Napoleon will get heated, writing in bolded cap-locks and insist that he's Black. Oh well, I have some time today before I have to leave the Coli to attend social gatherings and the like, something Napoleon doesn't seem to do since he's always on here.
If I can prove on example of a religion which doesn't say kill all non-believers, your entire argument collapses. Please locate me the passage within the Baha'i faith which says kill all non-believers. Oh, you can't? Well, I guess you were just pretending to be an expert on something you know nothing about, as usual. Now, I shall ridicule you and everything you have said, thus far.
**********
"I don't care about cultural context. Its in the book. YOU don't get to proclaim the infallibility of a book that condones such behavior." - I never claimed that they're infallible. All I had to do was refute the idea that all religious faiths want to kill non-believers. In in the Qur'an with mentions towards the House of War and the House of Peace, the Prophet Muhammad wished to unite the pagan tribes of Arabia, not kill every non-Muslim (and there were many) in 7th century Arabia. After Islamic conquests of Egypt, Palestine, Persia etc - populations slowly converted to Islam, they were not exterminated as you and other bigots would like to assert.
"Except, its not. Present history in all religions around the world demonstrate this." - It doesn't. There. I just replaced your claim with another one. If you're going to argue. Back up shyt with analysis.
"Hindus are known for their evangelism. Judaism as well. Inclusion and expansion are very much the goals" - No, Hindus are not. Why? Because you can't create a caste out of thin air. That's largely why Hindus don't try and spread their faith that much unlike Abrahamaic religious. Jews don't really spread their faith that much either because Judaism has been linked to an ethno-cultural identity which has existed for 3000 years.
"fukk accountability for voluntary associations, right?
" - We can hold individuals responsible who claims they're representing a religious faith. Hard to do that with a religion because of a myriad of interpretation. Aka, nuance."Joy? You mean the selective interpretation of a book that also validated the very sorrow you want acknowledged? Stop contradicting yourself. This is getting embarrassing." - Ah, that magical word nuance which you don't get. Here, i'll make what i'm saying to you easier to understand. Do you think Black people in America would have hard a harder time during segregation and eventually battling for their rights without the social utility of religious organizations and people like MLK and Malcom X?
You're so stupid, @Napoleon. It boggles the mind. Proceed to have a temper tantrum!
REAL TALK BREHS
THE NATURE BOY GOT MAD LOVE FOR CANADA
THE FINEST HOES, KUSH AND NON OF THAT GOVERNMENT BULLshyt WE GET IN THE STATES
AND TO EVERYONE SAYING IT'S SO COLD...UNLESS YOU UP IN NATIVE LAND..shyt IS THE SAME TEMP AS NORTHERN US (NYC, BOSTON, ETC)
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
THE NATURE BOY GOT MAD LOVE FOR CANADA
THE FINEST HOES, KUSH AND NON OF THAT GOVERNMENT BULLshyt WE GET IN THE STATES
AND TO EVERYONE SAYING IT'S SO COLD...UNLESS YOU UP IN NATIVE LAND..shyt IS THE SAME TEMP AS NORTHERN US (NYC, BOSTON, ETC)
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO