Social Experiment Shows That Blacks Are Still Mentally Enslaved!

[sang_bleu]

But you do need the white man to tell you how to think
I'm just gonna throw something out there that might amaze you. White people thru-out history have a knack for getting people to hate themselves. Redskin is a slur because Redskin is bad.
****** was a word white ppl used back when they began to acquire black folk from Africa, correct?
Here's the million dollar question, do you think White ppl made up the name
In the year 1694 or whatever, not 100% of white ppl in America hated the slaves. Some felt sorry for them
Some even helped them escape, correct?
The ones who helped, when they got back to there house to talk about what they did with other like minded white ppl
Guess what they said They would go "I helped this ****** get to freedom"
It was just the name they used. Now they tell you it don't mean black, it means ignorant. Go look it up in the dictionary

But if a black person is in a room with 100 white ppl and one person says "Hey ******, come here" who you think they talking to?
So ******s are ignorant. But who invented the word? The Naga tribe from Africa taught the Asians about Buddah who's name is Samboa aka Sambo. But we hate little black sambo even tho Asian loves him and his positive message. Something you don't see these days in the c00niacan community these days.
Naga's
In spanish its Negro
We took the power back, but the education on the word still has a long way to go. I'll stop here for now...

That is part of the brainwashing
You see, if what you say is true. Then tell us all why did they ever change it
Let me say that again, you might have missed it. If the color is irrelevant, then why did they change it
Because there was no such thing as a WHITE JESUS until Michelangelo painted one in the year 1498 I believe (somewhere around there)
So for 1500 out of 2000 years Jesus was black. Why the change my dude
Who had it changed anyway? Julius "White Mike Sam" Caesar had it as he expanded the Roman empire
An empire that had an issue with Black Yeshua (jesus) And since the letter J wasn't invented until the 1600's
But now I'm dropping too much knowledge and I'm not supposed to be doing that. I'm a bad poster
Dude in the Vid was black

Jesus did not even exist

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

But you do need the white man to tell you how to think
I'm just gonna throw something out there that might amaze you. White people thru-out history have a knack for getting people to hate themselves. Redskin is a slur because Redskin is bad.
****** was a word white ppl used back when they began to acquire black folk from Africa, correct?
Here's the million dollar question, do you think White ppl made up the name
In the year 1694 or whatever, not 100% of white ppl in America hated the slaves. Some felt sorry for them
Some even helped them escape, correct?
The ones who helped, when they got back to there house to talk about what they did with other like minded white ppl
Guess what they said They would go "I helped this ****** get to freedom"
It was just the name they used. Now they tell you it don't mean black, it means ignorant. Go look it up in the dictionary

But if a black person is in a room with 100 white ppl and one person says "Hey ******, come here" who you think they talking to?
So ******s are ignorant. But who invented the word? The Naga tribe from Africa taught the Asians about Buddah who's name is Samboa aka Sambo. But we hate little black sambo even tho Asian loves him and his positive message. Something you don't see these days in the c00niacan community these days.
Naga's
In spanish its Negro
We took the power back, but the education on the word still has a long way to go. I'll stop here for now...

That is part of the brainwashing
You see, if what you say is true. Then tell us all why did they ever change it
Let me say that again, you might have missed it. If the color is irrelevant, then why did they change it
Because there was no such thing as a WHITE JESUS until Michelangelo painted one in the year 1498 I believe (somewhere around there)
So for 1500 out of 2000 years Jesus was black. Why the change my dude
Who had it changed anyway? Julius "White Mike Sam" Caesar had it as he expanded the Roman empire
An empire that had an issue with Black Yeshua (jesus) And since the letter J wasn't invented until the 1600's
But now I'm dropping too much knowledge and I'm not supposed to be doing that. I'm a bad poster
Dude in the Vid was black

Well my bad because i didn't watch but the truth is if there's still mental slavery then a random cac would suffice that theory.

 

[gho3st]

But you do need the white man to tell you how to think
I'm just gonna throw something out there that might amaze you. White people thru-out history have a knack for getting people to hate themselves. Redskin is a slur because Redskin is bad.
****** was a word white ppl used back when they began to acquire black folk from Africa, correct?
Here's the million dollar question, do you think White ppl made up the name
In the year 1694 or whatever, not 100% of white ppl in America hated the slaves. Some felt sorry for them
Some even helped them escape, correct?
The ones who helped, when they got back to there house to talk about what they did with other like minded white ppl
Guess what they said They would go "I helped this ****** get to freedom"
It was just the name they used. Now they tell you it don't mean black, it means ignorant. Go look it up in the dictionary

But if a black person is in a room with 100 white ppl and one person says "Hey ******, come here" who you think they talking to?
So ******s are ignorant. But who invented the word? The Naga tribe from Africa taught the Asians about Buddah who's name is Samboa aka Sambo. But we hate little black sambo even tho Asian loves him and his positive message. Something you don't see these days in the c00niacan community these days.
Naga's
In spanish its Negro
We took the power back, but the education on the word still has a long way to go. I'll stop here for now...

That is part of the brainwashing
You see, if what you say is true. Then tell us all why did they ever change it
Let me say that again, you might have missed it. If the color is irrelevant, then why did they change it
Because there was no such thing as a WHITE JESUS until Michelangelo painted one in the year 1498 I believe (somewhere around there)
So for 1500 out of 2000 years Jesus was black. Why the change my dude
Who had it changed anyway? Julius "White Mike Sam" Caesar had it as he expanded the Roman empire
An empire that had an issue with Black Yeshua (jesus) And since the letter J wasn't invented until the 1600's
But now I'm dropping too much knowledge and I'm not supposed to be doing that. I'm a bad poster
Dude in the Vid was black

my point seem to have gone over your head. I ignored the whole white Jesus concept because it is irrelevant to me. It should be to anybody who watched this video and understood the premise for it. But I guess nightmares of RG3 fumbles, interceptions and incompletions is clogging your mind breh...Hang in there you still got Cousins

Spoiler: Click me

Ohh and i stopped reading your bullshyt diatribe after "here's the million dollar question..." because i know nothing substantial was said in it.

 

[The Electric Lady]

This is fukking stupid. They would pick Jesus whether he was black OR white. He asked them who the most important person to them is, and they picked Jesus. This doesn't espouse slavery at all. This nikka is smart dumb to the core; probably flunked out of his Speech or Debate high school class. He would have a point if he had a pic of black Jesus along with the white Jesus and the kids went for the white one. Instead, he's just a fukking moron.

 

[Jahmal]

They are picking a fictional character and saying he is the most important to them LOL

 

[The Notorious K.I.M.]

He's asking about 2 dead guys and a mythological figure. LeBron James & Kobe Bryant would beat Garvey & X and Jesus in some instances.

 

[gho3st]

Of course he's somewhat bias...thats obvious..but the color differences in the pics likely arent a result of bias. Even if there was zero bias and photos were picked at random, thats what youll likely see. Color pictures of Garvey/Malcolm, black and white pictures of Jesus and depictions of jesus as black are three things that are all objectively unlikely. They exist but theyre exceptions. Google all three people, go to images and see what mostly pops up. We cant expect him to be an expert of methodology...but he just happens to be right. Whether hes talking about religion or race, hes still right.

Agree with ur religion point tho...

And his bias should not be ignored. So you mean to tell me that it is a coincidence that he picked a color image for Jesus and not Malcom X? It's also a coincidence that he only conducted his experiment on one set of people with 1 set of pictures?? bruh
Dude had a agenda and he set up a flawed experiment to bring about desired results

They are picking a fictional character and saying he is the most important to them LOL

dont be stupid nikka. they are picking what said character represents, not the character per sé.

 

[Jahmal]

dont be stupid nikka. they are picking what said character represents, not the character per sé.

they believe said character actually existed and died for their sins...

 

[GetInTheTruck]

poor execution.

 

[Bondye Vodou]

Black people using the n word shows that they are mentally enslaved. I don't need a social experiment to tell me that.

another big example(out of many) of black people being mentally enslaved is the term "good hair"

 

[Rack4K]

So you mean to tell me that it is a coincidence that he picked a color image for Jesus and not Malcom X? It's also a coincidence that he only conducted his experiment on one set of people with 1 set of pictures?

Occam's Razor. Its a nikka with a youtube account, not the University of Oxford.

I'm not saying it definitely was a coincidence since i don't have that knowledge but its the most likely possibility given the facts.

Ad hominem aside, if the pictures were chosen at random, would that have changed the results much?

 

[Hacksaw Jim Thuggin]

Black people using the n word shows that they are mentally enslaved. I don't need a social experiment to tell me that.

 

[gho3st]

Occam's Razor. Its a nikka with a youtube account, not the University of Oxford.

I'm not saying it definitely was a coincidence since i don't have that knowledge but its the most likely possibility given the facts.

Ad hominem aside, if the pictures were chosen at random, would that have changed the results much?

Ad hominem? How is it ad hominem when the shyt i said out is directly related to the point the person making the video is trying to make. And no this is not occam's razor since this "simple" experiment he is supposedly conducting is built upon a skewed hypothesis.



And yes he had used different images(with one jesus of course) and test subjects of different races, he would have come to the conclusion that his "hypothesis" was false and the religion is the culprit, not the "white jesus" he's stuck on.

 

[Rack4K]

Ad hominem? How is it ad hominem when the shyt i said out is directly related to the point the person making the video is trying to make. And no this is not occam's razor since this "simple" experiment he is supposedly conducting is built upon a skewed hypothesis.

You seem hellbent on assuming he strategically chose the pictures he used to get 'desired results' despite the facts making that unlikely. I assume you're using ad hominem reasoning for that, sue me.

Pictures of Jesus generally being in color and of a white depiction (as I said before, Google 'Jesus' and go to 'Images') and pictures of both Garvey and Malcolm generally being the opposite means that the pictures he used in his study were likely to have those properties too. That's the 'simplest' explanation for the pictures having the looks it did. You assuming that he purposely picked those kind of pictures to get desired results is you trying to challenge Occam's Razor. Period.

But like I said, I'll throw you a bone on the religion thing. I don't think the results would have changed much if the picture of Jesus he showed was black since religion is definitely more important but white supremacy has played such a pivotal role in the propagation of religion in the black american community, it's essentially the same damn thing, anyway.

 

[Rack4K]

double post