Me too. If a game gets 87 or higher I typically buy it and enjoy it. Metacritic is a great toolI actually agree with most of the consensus review scores I've seen for a lot of the games I've played the past few years
Me too. If a game gets 87 or higher I typically buy it and enjoy it. Metacritic is a great toolI actually agree with most of the consensus review scores I've seen for a lot of the games I've played the past few years
yup.Never interested .
I ain't really played the game yet but I'mma trust this...because any game that got my nikka @Los! off BF4 MUST be goodGame is the shyt man fukk a critic and they ratings
Cod got low scores (I think they were 70s) and titanfall got mid 80s. Come on. Neither of those games are good examples.
And not everybody that has this game likes it. I don't understand this xbot narrative either. The game is on the xbox1 too.
Metacritic is an aggregator and is the best way we have to judge games. It's not just one review. It hasn't really done me wrong
At this point it's like "Ight nikka" move on. Dudes done left hella messages in the early impressions thread, posted reviews in the official thread and now makes ANOTHER thread and TAGS people in it just to see what people say. It's like some of these guys want their opinions validated like "Yea I knew I wasn't a sheep and I didn't fall for the hype.The stans are the main ones posting any negative thing about this. How many thread have they created obsessive over ratings?
".The stans are the main ones posting any negative thing about this. How many thread have they created obsessive over ratings?
Real nikkas know bungie is that old bytch we dikked down years ago... she aint shyt no more since she let that nikka terry bone

if the fukking reviews are marginal across the board why would you waste 60 dollars trying to be hardcorebelieve reviews in 2014 instead of actually playing the games brehs
that new bytch with the old tricks tho![]()
looks at old trusty