Sour grapes post, but teams like the Jets were better off with the replacement refs

Stone

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
15,105
Reputation
701
Daps
30,282
Reppin
NULL
Dog....he didn't throw the flag immediately.... :heh:

Who gives a damn where it landed. He waited to throw the flag way after the fact.

Either way, the Jets lost the game for a lot of reasons....and my biggest issue was the player personnel decisions and late game scheme. The Jets coaching staff had more to do with that loss more than any failures by Sanchez, bad calls and everything else.

This right here, that 3rd and 1 call when they had the ball at the two left me scratching my head. Can't come up with 3 points in that situation.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
70,052
Reputation
11,095
Daps
236,684
This right here, that 3rd and 1 call when they had the ball at the two left me scratching my head. Can't come up with 3 points in that situation.


Not only the 3rd and 1 where they didn't use Tebow, how about going to the THREE MAN rush in the end of the fourth when the four man rush worked for them most of the game?

And lets not forget seeing the great Shonn Greene being put on pass routes where Simms says a Pats defender makes a great open field tackle on him when the entire NFL not named Simms knows Greene can't elude an on coming snail.

Just horrible decision making by the Jets coaching staff all around yesterday.
 

NY's #1 Draft Pick

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,852
Reputation
6,680
Daps
100,786
Reppin
305
Threads like these piss me the fukk off cuz these fakkit pats fans get to celebrate, the pats win and the jets get the shaft like always and there's nothing we can do about it.
 
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
34,828
Reputation
9,749
Daps
106,182
Reppin
NULL
I was digging the replacement refs.They were incompetent at times, but they didn't display that same old pattern of bias behavior that the old refs seem to be stuck on.
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,396
Reputation
262
Daps
18,338
Reppin
FL
Bill Barnwelll, Grantland.com



"Forgot About Brady

Let's go back to the final play of that Jets-Patriots game, because it shouldn't have been the final play at all. Mark Sanchez is sacked on his dropback and certainly fumbles the ball backward, a decision that was reviewed by the notably incompetent Jeff Triplette and confirmed before the game was officially brought to a halt.
What the referees didn't call at the time, though (and couldn't overturn on review), was a personal-foul penalty that should have kept the game going. The initial contact with Sanchez is made by Jermaine Cunningham (no. 96), who falls down at the line of scrimmage in front of Sanchez and crawls at Sanchez before diving at his ankles and knocking him down. Patriots fans will undoubtedly remember what I'm referring to: the Brady Rule.
After Brady's infamous injury at the hands of Bernard Pollard ended his 2008 season, the league protected quarterbacks from shots below the knees by players who were downed at their feet. The rule provides an exception for players who were blocked into the quarterback, but Cunningham is clearly no longer blocked when he crawls after Sanchez for several steps. The rule also notes that defenders are allowed to "swipe" at the quarterback, but Cunningham forcibly tries to take down Sanchez (somewhat successfully) by his ankles. That's a 15-yard penalty, one that should have extended the Jets' drive and the overtime session.
A missed call is one thing, but the league seems to be unofficially abandoning any enforcement of the Brady Rule. Only an hour earlier, I saw the Raiders take down Chad Henne with an even clearer Brady Rule hit. And several weeks ago, during the reign of replacement-referee terror, a Raiders player hit Ben Roethlisberger from the side with a diving shot into his ankle that left Roethlisberger visibly limping for the rest of the series. Neither of those plays was called, and neither of the hits today even merited as much as a mention from the announcers in its respective game.
We all know how this ends. If the Brady Rule isn't enforced, the league is going to see defenders diving at the ankles of quarterbacks for sacks until somebody gets seriously hurt. Then there's going to be an outcry to protect the league's quarterbacks, James Harrison will say something outlandish, and we'll be having this whole debate all over again. Let's not require somebody to undergo reconstructive surgery before that happens. The Brady Rule is on the books. It might have cost the Jets a win on Sunday, but even that is less important than keeping the league's stars healthy. It's a rule that needs to be enforced."
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,396
Reputation
262
Daps
18,338
Reppin
FL
told y'all the real refs weren't any better :yeshrug:

I wouldnt go that far, but the patterns that are so easily recognizable when youre playing teams like the Pats, Steelers, Packers...these refs know exactly what theyre doing when they choose to extend drives.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
48,179
Reputation
2,886
Daps
140,810
They clearly are better.

This was just a bad call...not like the routine incompetence of the scabs.

obviously they're better especially from an experience perspective, but people on here was acting like they dont make live mistakes as well as decide drives.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
70,052
Reputation
11,095
Daps
236,684
obviously they're better especially from an experience perspective, but people on here was acting like they dont make live mistakes as well as decide drives.


When did they "act" like that?

:rudy:
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
70,052
Reputation
11,095
Daps
236,684
check the threads and twitter :comeon:
I do. And no one is stupid to say that a group of human being can't be wrong.

No one thinks real refs are 100% right.

You're exaggerating.
 
Top