Sources: NBA nowhere near agreeing to HGH policy

Higher Tech

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
14,962
Reputation
2,361
Daps
39,373
Reppin
Gary, Indiana
I wanna hear a real reason why this is so unfair to use and is such a negative for sports, like some real medical analysis. Its like the powers that be red flagged this shyt as some major unfair taboo, the media regurgitated the vileness of evil substance, and then the fans joined in on the parrot parade. If there are no major negative medical implications then I fail to see why this isn't a benefit to all parties involved. Fans get to see more of their favorite players on the field or court instead of missing time due to some nagging injury and ownership has their employees missing less time. And of course the players would like to heal faster. I hope this isn't just a case of people being afraid of advancements in science or a case of "thats not the way the old school did it".

If there's anybody that has more info on why this shyt is so taboo I'd love to be educated on it.
It's a knee jerk reaction to something people don't understand. "Its a growth hormone, so it must make you bigger!"
Marc Cuban talked about it too, and he's an owner and so far, a proponent of it. More research should be done before it's villainized.
 
Top