South Korean government proposes increase in work week to 69 hours from 52

thelonious21

I like my women tall
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
13,896
Reputation
1,184
Daps
26,246
Reppin
Da Hood
I'm convinced the leadership in each country are secretly robots...it's amazing how out of touch they are with the human experience. Yeah...more work will lead to healthier family life...not spending more time with them. Spending more time with your boss

Work MORE... in turn you get more time with your family by "banking" time :russ:.

So work en extra 17 hrs per week and NEXT YEAR you can spend more time :what:


But let's even start at that 52 hour week..

10.5 hours a day?
 

thelonious21

I like my women tall
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
13,896
Reputation
1,184
Daps
26,246
Reppin
Da Hood
Many responses are acting like it’s going from a standard 52 hour work week to a standard 69 hour work week. That’s not the case.

Korea caps hours at 40 standard up to 12 for OT.

This new rule allows 40 standard and up to 29 for OT on a given week, but the average still must be no more than 52 (it’s more complicated than that, but I’m not rewriting the whole article). This gives employees more flexibility so they can work more continuously and in turn take more continuous time off to be with their families.

But apparently they don't have enough time in the first place though
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,062
Reputation
237
Daps
3,145
People in here calling other people idiots is foolish.

If you work 69 hours in a week, you don't get the hours back, you still have to work 40 hours next week.

You don't get to choose to take 29 hours the next week, specially if the company need you and most companies lie about letting you take comp time.
 

num123

Speak like a child
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
7,062
Reputation
1,876
Daps
29,127
Reppin
Bay Area/Chicago
Many responses are acting like it’s going from a standard 52 hour work week to a standard 69 hour work week. That’s not the case.

Korea caps hours at 40 standard up to 12 for OT.

This new rule allows 40 standard and up to 29 for OT on a given week, but the average still must be no more than 52 (it’s more complicated than that, but I’m not rewriting the whole article). This gives employees more flexibility so they can work more continuously and in turn take more continuous time off to be with their families.
Problem is expectations vs reality. People generally do not want to work over time for long periods of time even with pay. Hell they just 5 years ago reduced the working week from 68 to 52:


Also who cares about an "average" of 52 when you are doing up to 29 hours overtime in a given week.

For counting periods of a month or longer, up to 29 hours a week of overtime would be allowed, for a total of 69 work hours in one week. Overtime could be exchanged later for time off at a rate that has not been announced.

From the employers side, which overtime options do you think they will be pushing the most?

Also you are not factoring in Asian work cultures like SK and Japan where people stay at work longer off the books because their supervisor/boss has not left yet, or mandatory after work get togethers that conveniently do not get counted as overtime. There is still a big problem with the unpaid and time wasting activities:





So in the end, although it may look fine, when you add it with all of the other shyt employees deal with, it is not that attractive.
 

richaveli83

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
56,544
Reputation
21,789
Daps
278,275
Reppin
Dallas, Texas but living in Houston, Texas
Them Koreans go HAM, even moreso than the US when it comes to workers' rights and corporate interest.

Any talk about unions is portrayed through the lens of "communist sentiment" and subsequently crushed in violent manner.
Not that I condone it but I kind of understand their fear of "communist sentiment" or anything that might resemble "socialism." They're technically still at war with North Korea, the North has nukes and tons of rockets that could level Seoul, and an insane dictatorship.

Again I don't condone it but I understand their paranoia even if I don't agree with it.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,219
Reputation
5,035
Daps
70,379
Sounds like one of those "you don't HAVE to work more, but it would be a lot better if you did :ufdup:" type deals
That’s literally not what it says. Their current mode tops the hours you can work in a week at 52. They’re proposing increasing the cap so you can work more in a week but then have more time off the following for example. Ultimately, you’re still not allowed to go past a certain amount of hours in a month. Like I said, this is no different than firefighters having weeks where they work 80 and then another week where they work like 20.
Problem is expectations vs reality. People generally do not want to work over time for long periods of time even with pay. Hell they just 5 years ago reduced the working week from 68 to 52:


Also who cares about an "average" of 52 when you are doing up to 29 hours overtime in a given week.



From the employers side, which overtime options do you think they will be pushing the most?

Also you are not factoring in Asian work cultures like SK and Japan where people stay at work longer off the books because their supervisor/boss has not left yet, or mandatory after work get togethers that conveniently do not get counted as overtime. There is still a big problem with the unpaid and time wasting activities:





So in the end, although it may look fine, when you add it with all of the other shyt employees deal with, it is not that attractive.

Nothing you said has anything to do with the thread title being false.
 

num123

Speak like a child
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
7,062
Reputation
1,876
Daps
29,127
Reppin
Bay Area/Chicago
That’s literally not what it says. Their current mode tops the hours you can work in a week at 52. They’re proposing increasing the cap so you can work more in a week but then have more time off the following for example. Ultimately, you’re still not allowed to go past a certain amount of hours in a month. Like I said, this is no different than firefighters having weeks where they work 80 and then another week where they work like 20.

Nothing you said has anything to do with the thread title being false.
Huh? I did not say anything about the title being false.
 

MajesticLion

Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
31,543
Reputation
6,136
Daps
67,972
Burning the candle at both ends and in the middle is a good way to end up with no damn candle in a hurry.
 
Top