Like I said, quote me then man. Don't just accuse me of contradicting myself, quote me saying the things that you are accusing me of saying.
i did quote you directly and i put links to your post
I never said that it was wrong to sell the dolls, I said that it was racist and an example of how the movie is exploiting slavery. Right or wrong is not for me to judge though. I'm not God, I'll let God do the judging. Yes, the selling of the slave dolls is a moral issue but whites have always proven themselves to be immoral when it comes to race.
wait what??? so selling the dolls is racist and exploiting slavery but its not your place to judge
so then why are you judging white people, who are you to say they are wrong? why dont you let God judge white people and their apparent immorality?
This is why I scoff at blacks who are sucking QT off like he is to celebrated or championed for making this movie. I don't have "beef" with QT or his movie, I have beef with socalled blacks like you who feel the need to swoop in and defend your masters from the truth. None of this surprises me. I called this with my eyes closed. I knew that this was a movie that exploited slavery before I saw it. The posts I have in the Django thread in the Arcadium forum serve as proof. Any movie about slavery that entertains white people is a "c00n" or sellout flick, point blank period. A movie that illustrated a trie no holds barred look at slvery would not entertain whites. Whites aren't even capable of having a true honey discussion concerning race relations in the present day, let alone own up to what they truly did to out people in the past. Django is yet another diversion from reality regarding race in this country. QT exploited slavery for a buck. You can cloud the issue by bringing up other shyt all you want, but you can't argue against what I just said.
if QT exploited slavery for a buck, who are you to say thats right or wrong, why dont you let God judge that
i dont remember defending "my massa" from the truth, what i said is that django was a good movie but that it was exploiting slavery and i didnt like the dolls and i pointed out how qt uses the word ****** to entertain white people
how is that defending QT?
maybe you got mad that i associated it with the use of nikka in rap music to entertain white people, but like you said why dont you let god be the judge, dont judge me, you arent god
you dont think you can judge your massa selling slave dolls but you think you can judge another black person expressing their opinion?
As far as what I said about the music industry, once again you're twisting my words. I didn't say that the music industry is color blind. I said that exploitation within that industry isn't just about race. Everybody gets exploited in the music industry, not just blacks. Blacks even exploit other blacks regularly.
that doesnt make any sense, you are saying that exploitation in the music industry and and student athletics has nothing to do with race
but then you say the music industry is not color blind? but what about the industry make you think its not color blind, since the exploitation part is color blind where do you see racism in the music industry?
The main point was that exploitation within te music industry is a different conversation than this we are having about Django.
sure it can be a different conversation if you want it to be, its totally legit to analyze django in a vacuum and not consider the parallels to it in the music industry and in other areas, you and your crew can go ahead with that and i have profusely apologized for bringing other subjects and derailing the thread,
we just simply have to go our separate ways because i sure as hell think they are all tied together and i am most def "clouding the issue" by putting django in the larger context of corporate american entertainment