Spin: #ADOS set: Do you support Marianne WIlliamson

[Dr. Acula]

Despite her stance on immigration?

Immigration | Marianne Williamson 2020

CIVILIZED PATH
I will push for legislative reforms that include a full path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who do not have serious criminal background issues. The cost of naturalization must also be reduced and resources increased to help people navigate that process more easily and humanely.

• Civilized Path to Citizenship. Provide a timely, ethical, transparent and straightforward path to citizenship for all law-abiding, productive immigrants living in the United States.

• Overturn the “three- and ten-year re-entry bar.” Many people who would otherwise qualify for green card status, due to a relationship with a citizen or permanent resident, are in a heart-wrenching scenario because they first have to leave to apply and wait for a green card in their native country (as is currently required). They are subsequently not allowed to re-enter the United States for three or ten years, even if they are married to a U.S. citizen. They can be separated from their families despite abiding by our laws. This scenario traps people in undocumented limbo and this unnecessary hardship must be overturned.
• Support for DREAMERS. Children brought into the United States by their parents should not be punished. Working to expand protections and naturalization to all undocumented immigrants who were brought here as children, regardless of their current age, will also be a priority. They came here through no fault of their own, and many are, in fact, unaware that they are undocumented. DREAMERS, who are covered under DACA, have lived in America most of their lives and deserve our support.
• Reduce Number of Detainees. Reduce the record number of detainees currently under extended Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) control. Private detention centers and family detention centers should be closed as there are far more humane options that have been proven to work.
• End Family Separation.The Federal government has a moral responsibility to keep families together. For those that have been torn apart by the current administration, we must take immediate action to reunite children with their families.
• Speed-Up Processing. For the benefit of the U.S. and asylum seekers alike, we must speed-up the process so our government can determine the validity of an asylum claim. It is necessary to fund and authorize a vast increase in immigration judges to adjudicate the backlog of asylum seekers and other related cases. As an example, asylum seekers at the southern border should not be forced to stay across the border before being processed.
• LGBTQ Expansion Protection. LGBTQ immigrants and asylum seekers who experience discrimination here, as well as in their countries of origin, should receive expanded protection.
• Guarantee Constitutional Protections. Ensure that due process and constitutional protections are available to undocumented immigrants when it comes to deportation issues.
• Access to Health Care. Make affordable health care available to all families, whether they are documented or not.
• Real Border Security. Increase border security intelligently through electronic surveillance and more patrol agents, rather than an ineffective and expensive wall

Also her stance of including LGBTQ+ in Civil Rights protected class

The Equality Act would amend existing civil rights law — including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Housing Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Jury Selection and Services Act, and several laws regarding employment with the federal government — to explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected characteristics. The legislation also amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to prohibit discrimination in public spaces and services and federally funded programs on the basis of sexual orientation.

Additionally, the Equality Act would update the public spaces and services covered in current law to include retail stores, services such as banks and legal services, and transportation services. These important updates would strengthen existing protections for everyone.

 

[Dr. Acula]

Bumping because I want to see the same energy.

 

[smokeurobinson]

Bumping because I want to see the same energy.

She was the only one talking reparations yet ADOS would rather focus their energy on complaining about who isnt supporting reparations.

 

[Dr. Acula]

She was the only one talking reparations yet ADOS would rather focus their energy on complaining about who isnt supporting reparations.

There are other candidates who have supported reparations but a certain segment are "but.." "well" etc because of some other stance on another issues (usually immigraiton) for why that person is shyt. But I do know these same folks were riding heavy for Marianne but I question if they actually looked at her stance on other things besides reparations which are pretty much the same as some of the people they shyt on for the same stance

I just curious to see the squaring in the circle here. But I think folks will avoid. Though, at the same time, the fact I say this may make them come in to prove me wrong. I got no beef with her just with the hypocrisy of some posters and want to see it explained.

 

[smokeurobinson]

There are other candidates who have supported reparations but a certain segment are "but.." "well" etc because of some other stance on another issues (usually immigraiton) for why that person is shyt. But I do know these same folks were riding heavy for Marianne but I question if they actually looked at her stance on other things besides reparations which are pretty much the same as some of the people they shyt on for the same stance

I just curious to see the squaring in the circle here. But I think folks will avoid. Though, at the same time, the fact I say this may make them come in to prove me wrong.

The whole idea of "u Dont meet our demands of reparations, u dont get our vote" sounds ridiculous. If 1 Dem candidate even dared played with that idea..all that will do is draw out all the closet racists to vote heavy in Trumps direction. "They gonna get reparations and start a race war with the money...Let me vote Trump so that doesnt happen."

 

[Uno]

She was the only one talking reparations yet ADOS would rather focus their energy on complaining about who isnt supporting reparations.

They are miserable little fakkits that is all, the ADOS shyt is an act. As soon as this fad is over, it will be something like my ancestors killed their slave owners set

 

[smokeurobinson]

They are miserable little fakkits that is all, the ADOS shyt is an act. As soon as this fad is over, it will be something like my ancestors killed their slave owners set

Sadly it does appear to be an online fad. Too many supporters have left me with that impression. Like were was this same energy. 2 years ago? 5 years ago? 10 years ago?

Then there is the whole idea of being payed off for suffering. I mean shyt if they giving out a check, sure take it. But if I came in your home and raped your mom and daughter.....U mean I can pay u off with a few thousand dollars? This chick Marianne Williamson had a proposed budget that if it went thru would only give every qualified ADOS in the USA the same amount they'd get in an annual tax return check. A couple of Gs. I really took the time out to study and noticed that most of the followers of this ADOS movement are more into the wave then the actual reality of the situation at hand.

 

[saturn7]

No I don't agree with those stances. But we can hash out those differences as long as her stance on ADOS Reparations does not change.

She's the only candidate that I'm aware of that will attend the ADOS conference.

So much for "online fad".

 

[El Bombi]

Did the CAC OP not visit the Democratic Debate Thread?

 

[Dr. Acula]

No I don't agree with those stances. But we can hash out those differences as long as her stance on ADOS Reparations does not change.

She's the only candidate that I'm aware of that will attend the ADOS conference.

So much for "online fad".

So does that extend to other candidates have supported reparations? Is the marker for legitimacy the attending of the ADOS conference? Do they take precedence over the political stances and policies?

"We can hash out the differences" means what? Im sure marrianne isn't going to change her beliefs here.

Seems Marrianne gets a bit of leeway despite having a lot of similar stances as other candidates who have even more of a chance of getting past the primary stage.

 

[Dr. Acula]

Did the CAC OP not visit the Democratic Debate Thread?

I didnt even watch them. Debates imo are useless waste of time if you're already aware of the stances and secondly too early for this shyt to matter.

Stop talking in ambiguity. State plainly your stance. Not going to go look for your opinion in another thread. Otherwise gtfo since you obviously can't state a thought on the issue.

 

[El Bombi]

So does that extend to other candidates have supported reparations? Is the marker for legitimacy the attending of the ADOS conference? Do they take precedence over the political stances and policies?

"We can hash out the differences" means what? Im sure marrianne isn't going to change her beliefs here.

Seems Marrianne gets a bit of leeway despite having a lot of similar stances as other candidates who have even more of a chance of getting past the primary stage.

But but I'm supposed to be a CAC Trump supporter tho.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/official-2020-democratic-primary-debate-thread.712429/page-123

Williamson got my write-in vote on November 2020.

I'm officially team Williamson.

fukk the rest of these pieces of shyt.

Now sit your CAC ass down.

 

[Dr. Acula]

But but I'm supposed to be a CAC Trump supporter tho.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/official-2020-democratic-primary-debate-thread.712429/page-123



Now sit your CAC ass down.

I honestly don't care who you support breh I just like busting your balls. But I'm not going to let that take over this thread. Let's keep it in the other one.

Here is a serious question, not hate, why is it specifically team Marianne only when as I've shown you from her own website she agrees and even have more liberal stances on when it comes to immigration and LBGQT+ which you and I think folks like @xoxodede @HarlemHottie have stated preferably more conservative views due to the impact on ADOS (I don't even disagree fully btw). I don't have beef with those two btw, they are cool to me.

 

[Stone Cold]

 

[El Bombi]

I honestly don't care who you support breh I just like busting your balls. But I'm not going to let that take over this thread. Let's keep it in the other one.

Here is a serious question, not hate, why is it specifically team Marianne only when as I've shown you from her own website she agrees and even have more liberal stances on when it comes to immigration and LBGQT+ which you and I think folks like @xoxodede @HarlemHottie have stated preferably more conservative views due to the impact on ADOS (I don't even disagree fully btw). I don't have beef with those two btw, they are cool to me.

I'm still against illegal immigration just like our Great Queen Coretta Scott King.

But Marianne Williamson is the only one talking about cutting the check. So, I'm team Williamson right now.