Spurs ain't gonna do shyt in the playoffs - bookmark this shyt :nailcoffinyadeadmowmylawns:

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Everytime I log onto the coli I have 10 daps from other people and 5 quotes, 2 tags and a neg from your bytch ass

Pretty obvious who's on whose dikk here, funboy

So what you're saying is we both average the same numbers?

your numbers aren't conducive to winning tho. i already have them championships in the cabinet and a couple MVP awards.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

He's no Duncan



I'm sorry it came to that Dealing with his retirement is tough man, I'm sorry




I doubt it to be honest, and I'm thinking he may retire

I thought it was kind of awkward when Pop said we're all coming back, especially for the money then they asked Tim for a cosign and he was like Probably nothing bu I dont recall Pop and Timmy ever really being at odds about anything before.

 

[The War Report]

He's no Duncan



I'm sorry it came to that Dealing with his retirement is tough man, I'm sorry




I doubt it to be honest, and I'm thinking he may retire

Very few basketball players will ever be Tim Duncan.


Be grateful that you got to witness greatness after the undisputed GOAT retired.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

So whose the Super Bowl favorite 2016?

Colts, Packers and Hawks.

 

[Greenstrings]

You know very damn well it goes well beyond the actual result of this series.

It quite literally doesn't, the game 7 loss is the culmination of the journey and the margins were too small to call.

None of this is neither here nor there.

If that's the case then the same for all the factors you based this prediction on but even less so because at the point when we were having this conversation they hadn't even begun to play out. Just admit it, there was more gut feeling in this than anything else.

Regardless of what the BM had, they weren't going to repeat.

This ain't just BM talk. Going into this season as far as we knew they appeared to have the best system, array of players, proven track record and coach to win a chip. More so than you could have said of any other team at that point.

I had to down to the Thunder and Warriors as my 1a and 1b options. If Durant was healthy I wouldn't have been far off.

We had every reason to doubt the long term health of Durant over the season, or at the very least how his extended absence would affect their seeding. It's not a matter of scalable distance from actualised possibilities, its all odds and you hugely overestimated their chances just like you were lowballing the Spurs to start off the season based on not all that much.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

So what you're saying is we both average the same numbers? 

You're always worried about me, I dont think about you. You stay quoting me 5 times in every post and sifting through your bookmark rolodex for a quote in response to every sentence. Worst part is you type so much and rarely say anything of value.

your numbers aren't conducive to winning tho.

Everything I do is conducive to winning. I'm like 10,000-3 in real life but 500-0 online. Exchanges w you aint even competitive

i already have them championships in the cabinet

Legend in your own mind, eh? With no numbers, no hardware, no cosigns. Ricky Davis ass career

and a couple MVP awards.

Most Vacuous Poster


(aint this shyt annoying?)

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

You're always worried about me, I dont think about you. You stay quoting me 5 times in every post and sifting through your bookmark rolodex for a quote in response to every sentence.

As soon as the Clippers won, the first post you made was tagging me.

I don't bookmark anything. Don't be mad that I have a good memory.

Worst part is you type so much and rarely say anything of value.

Of course you're gonna say this because you're a pathological liar.

Everything I do is conducive to winning. I'm like 10,000-3 in real life but 500-0 online. Exchanges w you aint even competitive

You have no wins against me.

Legend in your own mind, eh? With no numbers, no hardware, no cosigns. Ricky Davis ass career

Look, I got more shooters in Queensbridge than you.

 

[L@CaT]

In 5 championships the Spurs have never repeated.

Muthafuka @Gil Scott-Heroin Talking like he John the Baptist or some shyt

An aging team that has never repeated

Wow, no suprise. They aren't going to repeat

 

[Hersh]

@Gil Scott-Heroin

appreciate u going in and looking for this old comment and dapping

spurs r done if they match up with clips/gs/okc

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

It quite literally doesn't, the game 7 loss is the culmination of the journey and the margins were too small to call.

A journey that wouldn't have ended up with them repeating.

Their age was showing, luck wasn't in their favor like last season and they would've slipped up further down the road even if they progressed past the first round.

If that's the case then the same for all the factors you based this prediction on but even less so because at the point when we were having this conversation they hadn't even begun to play out. Just admit it, there was more gut feeling in this than anything else.

It's irrelevant because everything that led up that point is why they were in that position in the first place -

"This is only scratching the surface as to what they'll need to go their way this season:

Secure #1 seed
Largely remain injury-free
All three of Parker, Duncan and Ginobili to maintain their games (relative to what their bodies can cope with)
Role players step up another level and at the right times
Kawhi to develop his game and grow into a star
Maintain the gap on the competition or at least keep them out of team difference
Injuries (e.g. Ibaka last season) to other other squads
Have 50/50 calls go their way in every series and at certain turning/momentum points in games
Ability to stay fresh enough to counter balance the youth of other teams throughout the playoffs
The reliance on other teams' stars not having career performances
The reliance on other teams' role players not outplaying theirs

I could go on and on but you get the point - if any one of these fails to reoccur, it'll break the foundation and cracks will emerge, and when cracks emerge, their % of repeating drops according to the relevancy of each one to where a team can take an advantage of power."

It wasn't about having a gut feeling, it was the fact that they weren't going to have the same luck again, the decline in ability and the general improvement of every other team.

This ain't just BM talk. Going into this season as far as we knew they appeared to have the best system, array of players, proven track record and coach to win a chip. More so than you could have said of any other team at that point.

Last season was the closing of their window - like I said before the season started, teams' star players were hitting their primes or either still in their primes on hungrier teams while the Spurs were on the decline - the margin between all the teams in the West and the Spurs would close significantly. And that's what exactly happened, the Spurs were no longer untouchable.

We had every reason to doubt the long term health of Durant over the season, or at the very least how his extended absence would affect their seeding. It's not a matter of scalable distance from actualised possibilities, its all odds and you hugely overestimated their chances just like you were lowballing the Spurs to start off the season based on not all that much.

That couldn't possibly be more further from the truth on both fronts. Seeding didn't really matter to this Thunder team, and while there was concerns over Durant's health - any reasonable person wouldn't expect him to sit out for most of the season (nobody had the Thunder missing the playoffs because of it). I never lowballed the Spurs in any fashion - all their highs/lows through the season, their seeding and their playoff exit disproves any notion I was doing so.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

As soon as the Clippers won, the first post you made was tagging me.

Wrong again, first thing I said was Chris Paul is the GOAT

I don't bookmark anything. Don't be mad that I have a good memory.

Here's where I categorically accuse you of lying without any evidence simply because I dislike you. That's a good tactic, isnt it?

Of course you're gonna say this because you're a pathological liar.


Yeah thats a good tactic.

You have no wins against me.



I know that mjpls is really a . Chris Paul and James Harden balling out in the first round alone, while Sabo watches from home, that alone renders like 90% of the shyt you've said in arguments w/ me foolish and wrong.

Look, I got more shooters in Queensbridge than you

Appropriate. That was a desperate lie, Jay lost that exchange and so have you

 

[FAH1223]

In 5 championships the Spurs have never repeated.

Muthafuka @Gil Scott-Heroin Talking like he John the Baptist or some shyt

An aging team that has never repeated

Wow, no suprise. They aren't going to repeat

Their core wasn't aging in 2003, 2005, and 2007. They were young or in their prime

The Spurs have had a lot of veterans around those 3 when they were younger and as they've gotten older they put younger legs around them.

They got Leonard, Mills, Joseph and Green basically in one year. Brought Splitter over from overseas.

RC Buford and Pop know what they're doing when they evaluate talent.

Shid, I'm a Wizards fan and I've never witnessed a 'ship and nikkas on the coli are always talking about not repeating is a failure

nikka, I just want to see my team win ONCE

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]


I know that mjpls is really a . Chris Paul and James Harden balling out in the first round alone, while Sabo watches from home, that alone renders like 90% of the shyt you've said in arguments w/ me foolish and wrong.

The fact you even believe this shows how delusional you are.


Here's where I categorically accuse you of lying without any evidence simply because I dislike you. That's a good tactic, isnt it?

I've provided evidence of your lies many a time, yet you've never acknowledged them because you have a mental disorder.

 

[L@CaT]

Their core wasn't aging in 2003, 2005, and 2007. They were young or in their prime

The Spurs have had a lot of veterans around those 3 when they were younger and as they've gotten older they put younger legs around them.

They got Leonard, Mills, Joseph and Green basically in one year. Brought Splitter over from overseas.

RC Buford and Pop know what they're doing when they evaluate talent.

Shid, I'm a Wizards fan and I've never witnessed a 'ship and nikkas on the coli are always talking about not repeating is a failure

nikka, I just want to see my team win ONCE

Their core wasn't aging in 2003, 2005, and 2007. They were young or in their prime

The Spurs have had a lot of veterans around those 3 when they were younger and as they've gotten older they put younger legs around them.

They got Leonard, Mills, Joseph and Green basically in one year. Brought Splitter over from overseas.

RC Buford and Pop know what they're doing when they evaluate talent.

Shid, I'm a Wizards fan and I've never witnessed a 'ship and nikkas on the coli are always talking about not repeating is a failure

nikka, I just want to see my team win ONCE

Bottomline it's not a suprise they didn't repeat nor is it a failure.

All the Spurs had to do was beat the Pelicans to play the Mavs in the offs and they failed.

That was the first big sign that the Spurs were not going to repeat.

And by not beating the Pelicans they had to face a talented Clippers team.

Taking the Clippers to 7 is an honorable loss and series to be apart of.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

The fact you even believe this shows how delusional you are.

How's that? You like to type a lot, break it down for me in detail.

Feel free to use your notes and bookmarks.

Same goes for your edit. Last time I reminded you of how you tried fudging the numbers on CP and Russ' respective win percentages w and w/o them, you ran away for the 2nd time. Show me where I've done that.