It does.Yea cause the Western Conference only centers around the Lakers![]()

It does.Yea cause the Western Conference only centers around the Lakers![]()

When the Spurs got bounced in the first round two years in a row? The second year they lost 3-1? You realize an almost a three peat is winning at least two championships in a row right?
What?


ExactlyDude's team never eliminated a good Lakers team. I appreciate what the Spurs team did but he's just kicking dust at ghosts.
15 years ago and u still mad
sound like a ex bytch who cant get over her good first piece of dikk
![]()


15 years ago and u still mad
sound like a ex bytch who cant get over her good first piece of dikk
![]()
Yea cause the Western Conference only centers around the Lakers![]()
The reality is that if that 1999 title is put under close examination, it simply doesn’t measure up to those won in non-lockout seasons. Not all players returned to the game in shape and ready to play, and San Antonio beat an eight-seeded Knicks team in the Finals that year, with the most memorable highlight of the series coming from a wide-open, baseline jumper from Avery Johnson, which is hardly the stuff of legend.

But on the other hand, even when setting the 1999 title aside, San Antonio accomplished something that Jackson was never able to, despite his incredible success as a head coach. This Spurs run has essentially lasted 17 years, and is still going strong — every one of those full seasons resulted in at least 50 wins, and the team hasn’t missed out on the postseason since 1997.





True
What do they mean?
There is NOTHING San Antonio has done that Phil hasnt been able to do except lose as the 1 seed to an 8 seed.
Phil Jackson coached for 20 seasons, has NEVER coached a team that has missed the postseason, and took his teams to 13 NBA Finals winning 11 of em
Phil Jackson > San Antonio as a team, franchise, and organization.
#LWO
![]()
