fukk the numbers.. I accused Steph of being just a gunner. He's good but what do y'all see that has him at Superstar level right now? Im saying Crawford can come in a jack shots up and I'd say do the same as Curry.
46-44-90 > 41-35-85
fukk the numbers.. I accused Steph of being just a gunner. He's good but what do y'all see that has him at Superstar level right now? Im saying Crawford can come in a jack shots up and I'd say do the same as Curry.
You said currys lack of size and not playing defense made u not consider him a superstar.I said Allen iverson(who was shorter and bonier and most of the time was a liability defensively) had those same traits and he was a superstar. Getting a lot of steals don't mean you're a great defender either. Lebron is the only player who took a team of scrubs to the finals.
Yes blake griifin is a superstar.Wade WAS a superstar but not anymore
When Steph leads to the dubs to the finals, lands an MVP, and consistently makes all-star and nba first teams like AI did then we will rethink Steph being a superstar.
But it is obvious you're trolling and just looking to go back and forth or maybe you really believe Blake is a superstar but even then continue to argue with you and your lack of Bball knowledge will have us in circles.
fukk the numbers.. I accused Steph of being just a gunner. He's good but what do y'all see that has him at Superstar level right now? Im saying Crawford can come in a jack shots up and I'd say do the same as Curry.
I'm not much of an numbers guy myself. I agree with you that Curry is overrated. I definitely think he's overrated as a playmaker considering he's very turnover prone, and he's not as great a point guard as people say he is. If you watch Curry a lot of his assists are mostly in drive and kick situations where he's throwing something over his shoulder.
He's a great passer, but his decision making is questionable at times. He's more efficient of a shooter than Monta is, and unlike MOnta he doesn't get caught in the air as much. Monta does a lot of jumppassing and driving into corners that gets him into trouble. He settles for a lot more midrange shots as well.
Steph is just a crazy, crazy shooter that happens to play the point guard position and is very good at breaking people down one-on-one. Monta is better at attacking the rim.
Steph is a very good player but i wouldn't call him a superstar
i love steph curry but no, he relies too much on his jumpshot. superstars need to have more to their game than getting hot and chucking up shots. i need to see him take it to the rack at will in crunch time before i call him a superstar.
more like a assassinQuestion, would y'all label Reggie Miller a Superstar?
think about that
This nikka ain't no superstar...if you call him a superstar you basically saying he in Kobe/LeBron/Durant territory. Think about that. Blake Griffin def ain't no superstar
so u telling me
wade is not a superstar
melo is not a superstar
cp3 is not a superstar
howard is not a superstar
drose is not a superstar
can u define superstardom... atleast from ur point of view