Steph Curry playoff record vs other stars. 17-11 vs Lebron

[Don Homer]

Nah, I’m not arguing that. I just find it interesting that “the best player since Jordan” couldn’t even crack a winning record against Steve fukking Nash


This thread is about Curry’s head to head record with Bron, right? I think Nash’s record against Kobe is relevant to the discussion since we're contextualizing head to head records


Teams?

Curry has never even won a single playoff game without a HOF teammate or two But Bron with Kyle Korver is supposed to beat Steph when he's a sidekick to a better MVP


He beat an injured weak ass Lakers team. The only great teams Jordan ever faced were the Celtics and Pistons and he has a losing record against both of those teams.

Teams? Yes, teams

the 2014 spurs only had 1 all-star that season: Tony parker. So yes, Teams, plural

Mavs with only Dirk as an all-star smoked Bron
Spurs with only Parker as an all-star smoked bron

 

[KidJSoul]

You tell me

It was still Curry's team

They went ahead and got another ring after KD left

Which proves the point

 

[Torrential]

Teams? Yes, teams

the 2014 spurs only had 1 all-star that season: Tony parker. So yes, Teams, plural

Mavs with only Dirk as an all-star smoked Bron
Spurs with only Parker as an all-star smoked bron

He’s going to ignore your post and just respond to me talking about Steve Nash

He wouldn’t dare make a thread saying “Steve Nash > Kobe”

Or… “Steve Nash has a legitimate argument as the best player in his generation”

What a disingenuous fakkit

 

[Osmosis]

what's with the desperation for wanting to bring Kobe and Jordan in the conversation

You have someone that has ate well in YOUR boy's era but he worried about others

let's stay on track with the thread topic the one you keep running from.


excuses excuses excuses

You really are a dumb motherfukker aren't you

Is Curry not in that graphic retard? And of course you don't have a retort for what's in the graphic. Once you bring facts into the discussion these cats self-combust.

So bringing up Nash in regards to Kobe is for what reason? In the context of this thread Curry is brought up In comparison to his peers as an argument that he’s the best player of his generation. Even if Kobe has a losing record to Nash there’s no one on earth that argues that Nash is over Kobe. Like I said the first three times if you want to make that thread be my guest fakkit

You’ll be laughed off the coli

More deflecting

You really don't have an answer for why Kobe was getting sonned left and right by a ringless Steve Nash. You're forced to strawman instead of engaging with what I'm actually saying.

I'll make it simple for you: Kobe lost repeatedly to a player that is barely even considered top 30 of all time, that's far more embarrassing than Bron losing to Steph and KD who are two top 15 players that were on the same squad (and Steph is top 10 btw, ahead of Kobe).

 

[Osmosis]

Teams? Yes, teams

the 2014 spurs only had 1 all-star that season: Tony parker. So yes, Teams, plural

Mavs with only Dirk as an all-star smoked Bron
Spurs with only Parker as an all-star smoked bron

I stand corrected

Of course, that Spurs team had 4 HOFERS, Kawhi was all-Defense and they won 62 games, but sure.

Now can you tell me how many playoff games Curry won without at minimum two future HOF teammates? Please include the dates these games were played on as well.

 

[Don Homer]

I stand corrected

Of course, that Spurs team had 4 HOFERS, Kawhi was all-Defense and they won 62 games, but sure.

Now can you tell me how many playoff games Curry won without at minimum two future HOF teammates? Please include the dates these games were played on as well.

ur moving the goalpost. That team had 1 All-star who averaged 17ppg and 1 all-defense 2nd team guy who averaged 11. And somehow Bron lost to them by the largest margin in NBA finals history.

Trying to use Curry's ability to elevate his Klay and Draymond to HOF levels isn't a knock on curry

 

[Osmosis]

ur moving the goalpost. That team had 1 All-star who averaged 17ppg and 1 all-defense 2nd team guy who averaged 11. And somehow Bron lost to them by the largest margin in NBA finals history.

Trying to use Curry's ability to elevate his Klay and Draymond to HOF levels isn't a knock on curry

The Heat lost because Wade, the second best player on the Heat, was getting his knees drained and averaged less PPG in the finals than four players on the Spurs. Those four players happen to be HOF multiple time all-stars.

In fact, Duncan was All-NBA the season prior and All-NBA the season after but because he was snubbed in 2014 he doesn't fit your dumb criteria.

And it is a knock when Klay has a better playoff record without Steph than Steph does without Klay

 

[Torrential]

You really are a dumb motherfukker aren't you

Is Curry not in that graphic retard? And of course you don't have a retort for what's in the graphic. Once you bring facts into the discussion these cats self-combust.




More deflecting

You really don't have an answer for why Kobe was getting sonned left and right by a ringless Steve Nash. You're forced to strawman instead of engaging with what I'm actually saying.

I'll make it simple for you: Kobe lost repeatedly to a player that is barely even considered top 30 of all time, that's far more embarrassing than Bron losing to Steph and KD who are two top 15 players that were on the same squad (and Steph is top 10 btw, ahead of Kobe).

You aren’t even arguing anything

And when I challenge you to own your stance which is that Nash is better than Kobe you deflect and shy away from making the thread . Like I’ve repeated multiple times you would absolutely get laughed off the coli if you tried to do that

I know you’re slow but this thread is for addressing Curry against his peers . Your shytty whataboutism is just a grift because you’re projecting YOUR embarrassment.

 

[Don Homer]

The Heat lost because Wade, the second best player on the Heat, was getting his knees drained and averaged less PPG in the finals than four players on the Spurs. Those four players happen to be HOF multiple time all-stars.

In fact, Duncan was All-NBA the season prior and All-NBA the season after but because he was snubbed in 2014 he doesn't fit your dumb criteria.

And it is a knock when Klay has a better playoff record without Steph than Steph does without Klay

My criteria isn’t some made up stat. Curry’s success just has you insecure

Klay played 12 playoff games without Steph, and Steph has played 9. Again, ur going with a dishonest narrative without context because Steph makes you insecure

Your argument is basically “only LeBron gets to have help”, and if someone else has a good teammate, their wins don’t count.

 

[Jazzy B.]

The Warriors were already one of the best teams in the league with four future HOFers, the best regular season of all-time, and a championship ring before they added Durant. You can't compare that to Lebron languishing on the Cavs with Boobie Gibson and Mo Williams going up against the big 3 Celtics.

The Thunder, while young, were still a team comprised of three all-star level players. Harden was 6 MOTY, Russ averaged 24 that season, and KD was the MVP runner-up. The Spurs were a dynasty that consisted of three HOFers and a young future HOFER in Kawhi. Those matchups against the Heat weren't some David vs. Goliath shyt. They were relatively evenly matched up, especially considering the health issues the Heat had.

The Warriors were the best regular season team in league history able to add a former MVP due to an unprecedented cap spike. You can't really compare it to any other situation. And even so, nobody is devaluing their rings but they deserve context when you compare Curry and Bron's head to head records. Just like you would provide context for Jordan being winless against Bird and having a losing record to Isaiah.

I’ve already DEBUNKED this

You talk as if Kevin Love played at an “average level” in 2016 in the finals

And yet The Cavs still won.

The Cavs went 24-4 in their playoff conference over a two years in 2015 and 2016 and half of that was without Love.

They were better than The Warriors who shouldn’t have even made The Finals in 2016. If not for KD being > Bron from 2016 Bron wins 3 straight.

2017 cavs were a historic playoff team


2015-2017 Cavs only dropped 5 playoff games in their conference over a 3 year stretch

The cavs only dropped FOUR GAMES over a TWO YEAR STRETCH (2015 & 2016) in the Eastern conference playoffs.

The regular season DIDN'T MATTER.

The Warriors dropped EIGHT games in the Western Conference playoffs between 2015-2016. And were also 3-1 down at a point.

Pre-KD they were not this UNSTOPPABLE team. That was ACTUALLY instead Lebron's Cavs.

 

[RedBull]

4-6 finals record. Stop arguing.

 

[SymbolicOne09]

Nah, I’m not arguing that. I just find it interesting that “the best player since Jordan” couldn’t even crack a winning record against Steve fukking Nash


This thread is about Curry’s head to head record with Bron, right? I think Nash’s record against Kobe is relevant to the discussion since we're contextualizing head to head records


Teams?

Curry has never even won a single playoff game without a HOF teammate or two But Bron with Kyle Korver is supposed to beat Steph when he's a sidekick to a better MVP


He beat an injured weak ass Lakers team. The only great teams Jordan ever faced were the Celtics and Pistons and he has a losing record against both of those teams.

Every team jordan beat in his championship runs are not considered great because the bulls were the great dynasty of the 90s..
98 Utah jazz swept a shaq kobe 98 lakers squad that won 60 games...
96 sonics beat the defending champion rockets. Won 64 games

93 suns score at the same pace then the 2016 warroirs

92 blazers went to the finals before the bulls

 

[10bandz]

How this clown talking about Kobe vs Nash over and over like the 2010 WCF's never happened.

 

[bl2k8]

The way they would try to talk about Steph if he never got that 2022 ring

 

[Osmosis]

You aren’t even arguing anything

And when I challenge you to own your stance which is that Nash is better than Kobe you deflect and shy away from making the thread . Like I’ve repeated multiple times you would absolutely get laughed off the coli if you tried to do that

I know you’re slow but this thread is for addressing Curry against his peers . Your shytty whataboutism is just a grift because you’re projecting YOUR embarrassment.

If you can't read just say that instead of wasting my time

You made the same retarded posts four times in a row, each one getting progressively dumber with more and more words that you don't understand. I made it simple for you and you still can't address the crux of my argument. Just more deflection.

Once again for you and your fellow retarded Kobe stan: You're a Kobe dikkeater, correct? You made this thread with an obvious agenda. Your claim is that Curry is the best player of his generation because of his H2H record against Bron, regardless of the context behind those matchups. If that's the case, explain how Kobe has a losing H2H record against a player that is vastly inferior? The fact that Nash is ringless and still has a winning record against Kobe in the playoffs only reinforces my point that H2H records are a stupid way to evaluate players.