SO THATS 50% OF THE GAME.....WHERES THE OTHER 50% AT? THATS RIGHT. KOBE IS LIGHTYEARS AHEAD OF STEPH IN TERMS OF DEFENSE.....BUT EVEN ON OFFENSE, KOBE IS A BETTER OVERALL SCORER THAN CURRY. BETTER FOOTWORK, POST GAME, SLASHER, MID-RANGE.....AND STEPH IS PLAYIN ON AN INCREDIBLE SHOOTING TEAM, MEANING ITS MUCH HARDER TO DOUBLE HIM THAN IT WAS WHEN KOBE WAS PUTTIN UP 35 A NIGHT PLAYIN NEX TO SMUSH PARKER AND LUKE WALTON. FACT OF THE MATTER IS, STEPH IS NOWHERE NEAR KOBE..HES CLOSER TO JOHN STOCKTON, WHICH IS GREAT IN ITS OWN RIGHT....BUT CLEARLY NO KOBE.
And? Curry is still a better shooter. Who cares about footwork when Curry can get his shot off against any kind of defense. Curry doesn't need a post game to a better scorer and who care?
Curry is such a better shooter than Kobe that most of the shyt you bring up doesn't matter. Curry gets into the lane at will due to his handles, he's an elite finisher in the paint, he's better shooter and able to get his shot off easier, and he's more efficient.
Kobe has NEVER sniffed Curry's level of efficiency not even when he was playing with the GOAT-tier center as a 2nd option so who cares?
Curry's advantages in creating off the dribble, shooting, and scoring are much more impactful than Kobe's. Melo has better mid-range than Curry but who cares?
Curry is a better passer, playmaker, scorer, shooter, has more range, is better off ball, and more efficient than Kobe has ever been. He's better at making bad shots than Kobe.
Curry is on another level of efficiency. It's like comparing MJ to Iverson. Kobe has never had a season as impressive as Curry's.
