
You just said it again and no because one impacted the game on defense while the other was a liability, it doesn't get simpler than that, but you can keep spitting your lazy ass analysis while blaming your lack of understanding about the game on the coli if it makes you feel better.

That was literally Stephen A's argument, I just tried to explain what he meant to say and why he said it.
no, i didnt...i was only talking about the avg 35 point he tries to make, when in fact it was 35 vs 33 avg wise...so if one is said to have played lack of def, so did the other cause that's only a 2pt difference...he'd have a point if the cavs lost by 2 every game, but they didnt....that means there were other factors besides bron & kd at play....
another coli staple: when your point gets proven wrong, go with insults lol....
as for the rest: it's clear you wanna bash bron...even called the man a liability lol.....anyway, that's cool, bash away...but dont dont include me in that, i'm good.....
no need to clarify that what he said cause that is some dumb shyt lol....the blazers were not the better team....if they were, they wouldve won...and if the lakers werent the best team in the league at the time, they wouldnt have 3peated...it's rather simple to see he's full of shyt....