ok cool, you like gambling with your life. all it takes is ONE crazy cracka to fukk all your shyt up. me? i don't take that chance. i got more to live for than that
lol sure pal, you gonna tell me what I am? fukk outta here, just because i don't agree with your viewpoint i must be white? i hate white people as much as the next guy (since i live in south VA I meet them a lot and they have taken land from my ancestors) but its hypocritical as fukk to say that only white people can be prejudice , when I myself don't trust white people when im out and about.
once again this doesn't come down to race, it comes down to a time and a place. if im walking around and see this:
![]()
or this:
![]()
i'm gonna feel some kind of way. that was SAS overall point. when it comes down to his actual views on RACE, i don't know and don't care, but what he was talking about today is NOT the same as pure racism
But are the 2 images equivalent to a black kid wearing a hoodie?
My instincts have been keen all my life. Its not a gamble. Im not crossing the street because A.) it shows fear and B.) them same robbers/killers got legs and if its your time to get got, you will get got.
I have a very diverse group of friends/associates who I have tried to just have a simple discussion with about racism(not even close to being deep psychological, socio-economic type of conversation) and that shyt in the bold always rears it's head. A lot of people just need to face it. You cannot have a civil discussion on the subject with the average white person without them getting defensive or try to throw other factors into the equation when the main culprit is racism. It's a sad fact and honestly, they need to have the discussion amongst each other a million times more than black people.IAnd dont get caught up in that its never about race shyt...........its ALWAYS about race my friend.





so a black man in a hoodie is equal to a tatted up skin head?I agree with Stephen A. Smith. If you think what he said was "c00ning", then I think you missed his point.
Also, not really sure how you can call Mark Cuban racist when he said he'd cross the street if a tatted white dude was walking down it, as well. Is he racist against white people too, then? Nah, it's about risk assessment and instinctual self preservation.
I also think it's important to point out that the question was asked of him generally, not having anything to do with how he felt about the Stirling situation at all.

There's nothing "honest" about what Cuban said. His comments were made to lowkey justify and deflect from white supremacy. When whites get on that "we're all prejudice" bullshyt that they're justifying their system of supremacy while trying to pretend as if it doesn't exist at the same time. Even if everyone's prejudice, there's only one group of people who have established a system of supremacy/oppression that enforces their prejudices on everyone else. That's the difference between racism and simple prejudice. The mentality that Cuban has is why the system will protect a white man who kills a unarmed black kid simply because he felt threatened by the black kid wearing a hoodie. There's no system that perpetuates/reinforces anti-white prejudice.I dont like SAS, but Cuban spoke the honesty that white America tries to hide, so we can have an actual conversation about it. Unfortunately, we'll never sit and have that convo.
I wish I could remember what exactly they were arguing about but the point is the way he said that told me all I needed to know about dude. The impression I got from that is he'll never speak up against anything because he's not jeopardizing his livelihood and his career for no nikkas.This nikka is a black conservative. fukk this nikkaThis nikka ain't been the same since ESPN fired him. That nikka was on some borderline militant shyt with his show "Quite Frankly", the White man fired him and canceled his show and he was in the wilderness and was so desperate he became a regular on Sean Hannity's show. Then Skip Bayless realized First Take needed better debates because every week they'd have a different guest so he got ESPN to hire Stephen A. back and dude been different ever since.
I guess he had a moment of clarity when he got fired because he came back a different nikka. I guess they humbled his ass to that Pro-Black shyt. Dude had Jim Brown on his show kicking some revolution type shyt before he was fired, he comes back and probably won't even take a picture with Jim Brown. The worst part of nikkas is that the vast majority of us worship the dollar. Rob Parker called RG3 a cornball brother and hasn't been seen since. Cold world.

This nikka ain't been the same since ESPN fired him. That nikka was on some borderline militant shyt with his show "Quite Frankly", the White man fired him and canceled his show and he was in the wilderness and was so desperate he became a regular on Sean Hannity's show. Then Skip Bayless realized First Take needed better debates because every week they'd have a different guest so he got ESPN to hire Stephen A. back and dude been different ever since.
I guess he had a moment of clarity when he got fired because he came back a different nikka. I guess they humbled his ass to that Pro-Black shyt. Dude had Jim Brown on his show kicking some revolution type shyt before he was fired, he comes back and probably won't even take a picture with Jim Brown. The worst part of nikkas is that the vast majority of us worship the dollar. Rob Parker called RG3 a cornball brother and hasn't been seen since. Cold world.