Stephen A c00n says Mark Cuban should be applauded for his comments

Supa

Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
21,527
Reputation
7,783
Daps
116,960
Reppin
NULL
He said Sas is scapegoating by bringing up black pathology in a discussion about Sterling's racism:wow:

MLK didn't say whites want us to sit at the back of the bus so let's conform. He fought against it.:ooh:

Sas said his nephew wanted to go out with a hoody and his sis told him to take it off:snoop:

Skip siding with Dyson :skip:

Sas just said a white lady clutched her purse today while he had his suit on. He just killed his whole argument:heh:
 

lutha

Superstar
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
9,793
Reputation
720
Daps
13,507
Reppin
NULL
damn shame that sas can give an example he just did and still doesn't get it, smh....he's still willing to put up with the bullshyt instead of trying to combat and address the bullshyt...
 

lakinta

Rookie
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
219
Reputation
60
Daps
438
Reppin
NULL
really hate the white, bald tattooed man example. It is completely deceptive. The real point is that the image of the dangerous black man (hoodie or no hoodie) has fueled any number of federally-led or federally sanctioned policies that placed white and black folk on divergent paths of economic and political power. e.g. the 1934 housing act/redlining (and the tax base relocation that ensued); "urban/"Negro removal programs; exclusion of domestics/farm workers (jobs mostly blacks did) from social security provisions; etc. etc. etc.

The question about racism is not whether I would cross the street if Freddy Krueger was coming down the street. It's a question of what the feds -- not just during slavery, but now in the 20th century and 21st century -- have done to support white supremacy. And it's a question about what needs to be done to rectify that constitutional, economic, and moral tragedy. Part of the answer is calling out whites on the bullshyt racial stereotypes that legitimize discrimination. Obviously the other part is looking for federal redress. Because the long and short of the story is that whites not only received handouts; they flat-out hoarded them and then cried/cry out for color-blindness when blacks call them out their cism'.

Salute to Dyson for bringin' some clarity.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
159,031
Reputation
31,523
Daps
539,974
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
co-sign. Cari straight up asked him that question and he completely flipped the question around to something else.

why should black men be considered objects to fear in their own bodies while white men are only to feared if they disfigure themselves?

He knows why and I'll take it a step further and say it's not his fault directly.


the media from print media to tv to now the internet has created and and continues to cyse this view of the Black Man as a threat to them. It's been that way for centuries. You consistently see and read this agenda of the black man as a violent and dangerous creature going back from early literature to the media of today. It's beaten in your head that a certain "look" presented on a black man is one thing even though it's COMPLETELY different with whites.

Just an example:
pack of black kids walking down the street - gang (about to rob you/beat you up threatening)
pack of white kids doing the same - friends having fun (non threatening)

We've been "taught" by the media that black me doing, saying, or wearing certain things are "dangerous". In that respect, I see where Cuban's prejudice comes from.

Everyone wants to be judged as an individual and not grouped into one bucket, but when you are fighting a systematic label already attached to you as a black american, you are fighting an uphill battle from the womb.

The media and those who control it KNOW that this type of fear mongering and rhetoric sells, gets them ratings, etc. Look at the shift in hip hop once major corporations took over. There was balance back from the early 80s to early/mid 90s. That shyt is gone now and replaced with the same guns, sex, and violence that they know generate ratings. The people who put this shyt out and more importantly control it don't have to worry about the messages portrayed and how destructive it can be to their community since they don't have to deal with the shyt in their privileged communities.

Back on topic, Cuban knows why he brought up the hoodie example and should just be COMPLETELY honest in the fact that "image" of a black man in said hoodie is a threatening image instilled in his beliefs in general so he fears that individual. The roots of the fear and prejudice are the deeper issue IMO.

The only one I've found in life to confront racism and bigotry is to actually spend time with people of varying ethnicity, class, and beliefs. And most important, be honest. And check them when they are wrong.

the-more-you-know-o.gif
 
Last edited:
Top