
As we've seen being intelligent is not a barrier to entry in politics. Now the charisma part is legit; I don't know a single person that likes SAS.They did the testing, and they told him what he needed to hear. He ain't got the charisma or knowledge to run for president.
As we've seen being intelligent is not a barrier to entry in politics. Now the charisma part is legit; I don't know a single person that likes SAS.
I dislike SAS, but he debates people (albeit on Sports) every day for like the last 20 years or so. He would've run circles around those folks during debates. The scary thing is he probably would've done really well if he ran.They did the testing, and they told him what he needed to hear. He ain't got the charisma or knowledge to run for president.
He has no convictions and no in-depth knowledge on anything. He would've gotten utterly embarrassed by anyone competentI dislike SAS, but he debates people (albeit on Sports) every day for like the last 20 years or so. He would've run circles around those folks during debates. The scary thing is he probably would've done really well if he ran.
Okay. I don't want to defend Stephen A. Smith so I will stop here. LolHe has no convictions and no in-depth knowledge on anything. He would've gotten utterly embarrassed by anyone competent
Problem is he wouldn't go up against anyone competent lolHe has no convictions and no in-depth knowledge on anything. He would've gotten utterly embarrassed by anyone competent
Him dismissing the Epstein files will haunt him forever.
Most of the candidates are politicians with law degrees and actually involved in politics. He ain’t winning no debates . Sean hannity or whatever fox shyt he go on is bullshyt and spreads disinformation he didn’t properly research . He would be horribleI dislike SAS, but he debates people (albeit on Sports) every day for like the last 20 years or so. He would've run circles around those folks during debates. The scary thing is he probably would've done really well if he ran.