Stephen A Taking Tap Dancing to a new level

[NYC Rebel]

Those of you who who are upset with Stephen A, do you feel that there is enough outrage with the murders committed by blacks on blacks?

What should people be more outraged by, the recent murders by police or the murders committed by blacks on blacks and why?

Does one deserve more outrage than the other, and if so why?

Who isn't?



Because we are calling SAS for who he is, that means there isn't enough time to be outraged at other things?

MY ...GOD this is a weak defense.

The points SAS attempts to invalidate what blacklivesmatter is about by bringing up this argument. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. They're separate issues

 

[JordanwiththeWiz]

Here is where I address whole why "black on black crime." Is a lazy deference that's used ease tensions off of police brutality and racism. I also explain its common sense higher number of crime happens within race example white on white, black on black, Latin on Latin, Asian on Asian and Etc because majority races tend to stick together which more crime happening within race instead other race on other race but don't use that justifying systemic racism and police brutality. You don't see no other race group's crime rate get highlighted more then blacks it's reason behind that.

Those of you who who are upset with Stephen A, do you feel that there is enough outrage with the murders committed by blacks on blacks?

What should people be more outraged by, the recent murders by police or the murders committed by blacks on blacks and why?

Does one deserve more outrage than the other, and if so why?

It's just lazy to me. Instead of addressing the issue it deferres the argument to make white people think like yeah "what about black on black crime." When honestly they don't give a damn about black on black crime until it benefits them. So when black peoples talk about injustice, police brutality and racism. White people's irresponsible response is "what about black on black crime." It never answer our questions so of course black on black killings outnumber white on black killings common sense would tell you that white on white crime outnumbers black on black and white on white because they are the majority race and tend around each more to present more opportunity for crime. That's with any race it's going be more killing within the race then say outside the race because races tend to stick together by majority. When media news daily highlights black on black crime media outlets to majority white people it's to show look at black people they act like animal. They are trying to develop a inferiority complex that's how supremacy is born. That's why we live in the world we live in now. I'm proud to see my brothers and sisters fighting this. It's sad to see blacks turn into c00ns and try to justify racism but in the end I don't want the weak in the fight with me anyway.

 

[Rell84shots]

Are we all black people the same? I think that should answer your question. Don't know how people will say they don't like when people do something to,them then do it themselves unless you don't mind being generalized. If that's the case ok you got it.

No everyone's not the same, but i'm sick of seeing us cape for people then act hurt when they don't do the same for us.

 

[philmonroe]

No everyone's not the same, but i'm sick of seeing us cape for people then act hurt when they don't do the same for us.

They probably not the same people though. If they are well guess they will learn from mistakes I just can't get behind these types of generalizations esp when a lot of use would be pissed if it was done about us that's all.

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Even though he's a troll, he's right.

 

[keepemup]

Who isn't?



Because we are calling SAS for who he is, that means there isn't enough time to be outraged at other things?

MY ...GOD this is a weak defense.

The points SAS attempts to invalidate what blacklivesmatter is about by bringing up this argument. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. They're separate issues

'Who isn't' what?

What defense are you talking about?

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Those of you who who are upset with Stephen A, do you feel that there is enough outrage with the murders committed by blacks on blacks?

What should people be more outraged by, the recent murders by police or the murders committed by blacks on blacks and why?

Does one deserve more outrage than the other, and if so why?

Are u white

 

[JLova]

#All-livesmatter is stupid because it uses an obvious point(that life is sacred) to belittle and dismiss(circumvent) the #BlackLivesMatters hashtag. You can go through history(and even use the present) to showcase that all-livesmatter except black life.

So anybody who co-signs Alllivesmatter is an idiot that deserves to be ridiculed. I'm not gonna call SAS c00n or tap-dancer but all his commentary on social issues should be dismissed because he has demonstrated time and time again that the only thing he's good at discussing is basketball.

I'm talking about blacks not demanding more from each other. I don't agree with a lot of the sh1t he says but even a clown will have a point every once in a while.

 

[PhonZhi]

this is what it boils down to, blacklivesmatter came about because of the systemic way black lives are ignored, then alllivesmatter pops up and dismisses black lives once again...how can anyone co-sign this? this isn't some "we are the world tag" making sure every starving kid has food, the tag was to raise awareness of a specific problem, people wanting to take the power from that tag are the reasons it exists

Yep, the same way white people got mad when michelle obama co-signed the #BlackGirlsRock movement

 

[USSInsiders]

My favorite part of this gif is that the Jay Crawford head never gets updated.

That looks like Sean Hannity to me

 

[NYC Rebel]

I'm talking about blacks not demanding more from each other. I don't agree with a lot of the sh1t he says but even a clown will have a point every once in a while.

His point is trash. His point is to continue to be paid for talking about black people in front of white audiences.

To ACT like no one is doing anything about black on black crime is RIDICULOUS. Not only that, to leverage that to get folks to stop saying blacklivesmatter.

That is TRASH.

 

[ALonelyDad]

Mannnnnnnn all you can do is give this faceand move on

 

[gho3st]

I'm talking about blacks not demanding more from each other. I don't agree with a lot of the sh1t he says but even a clown will have a point every once in a while.

Really? because I think #BlackLivesMatter is more pitiful than anything else. We've arrived at a point where we demanding pity from everybody(black people included)... how can you sht on that with some obvious sht like #All-livesmatter... who doesn't know that life is important??

And notice how people who like to bring up black on black crime, never go(or want to go) in-depth about why "black on black" crime happens?? they won't even talk about how sht like proximity might be a possible cause.

 

[Stone]

Honestly we've had this conversation too many times for me to care, and I don't really know if that's a good thing.

 

[NYC Rebel]

Really? because I think #BlackLivesMatter is more pitiful than anything else. We've arrived at a point where we demanding pity from everybody(black people included)... how can you sht on that with some obvious sht like #All-livesmatter... who doesn't know that life is important??

And notice how people who like to bring up black on black crime, never go(or want to go) in-depth about why "black on black" crime happens?? they won't talk about how sht like proximity might be a possible cause.

My daughter died of some thing called MMA. I guess I should be a disingenuous fukk and go to the next breast cancer walk and yell "ALL DISEASES MATTER"