Stephen Curry thinks the moon landing is fake

IShotTheSheriff

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jan 13, 2015
Messages
4,441
Reputation
1,755
Daps
12,901

This this video really just start by saying FAKING the moon landing would've been harder than actually going to the moon?

Did it really just start with that nonsense like the moon is across the ocean or some shyt? Don't even know if I should continue lol

EDIT: "GIVEN THE FILM MAKING AND LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY AT THE TIME THAT WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE." This is asinine. So you ain't got the film making technology to make a certain type of video BUT you can travel to the MOON? Tru Network??? C'mon y'all.... stop eating anything you're fed. Use critical thinking. Their were many reasons (a lot of them political) to have faked this back in the day. MANY.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,127
Reppin
the ether
This this video really just start by saying FAKING the moon landing would've been harder than actually going to the moon?

Did it really just start with that nonsense like the moon is across the ocean or some shyt? Don't even know if I should continue lol

How is that nonsense? You do know that for most of history realistically faking shyt on film has often been harder than actually doing it, right? Look at special effects in movies from the 1940s and 1950s and think about it for a moment - I already posted examples.

We could fly across the ocean before we could even add dialogue to films.




If America says they went there and nobody else has been there to prove otherwise then of course they gonna say we went. They can't prove otherwise. And most countries don't even have booming space programs like that to be able to go.
It's 2019 we need another man on the moon
:talkintoyou:

America is a lying piece of shyt country that covers everything up in their own best interest why would or should I believe them now. :talkintoyou:
So if America is such liars, then why haven't any of the other 200 nations on Earth tried to prove us wrong? Why did the Russians accept it and take a huge L?

There are 70 countries with space programs, 13 of which have launch capacity, some of which are our enemies. Even Iran has put monkeys in space and satellites into orbit. If any of those countries thought there was something technically infeasible about what the Americans did, then why aren't they using their expertise to call the USA out?

And it's not just some abstract "America" that you're calling liars, there would have to be hundreds of thousands of people in on the conspiracy, all of the scientists and engineers and such at NASA who have worked there then and since who know full well what the actual capacity of spaceflight is and who can understand the science and technology themselves. But you think you understand the capabilities better than them cause you saw a youtube video.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,881
Daps
84,297
Reppin
NULL
The dumbest part about this conspiracy isn't just that you believe literally thousands and thousands of American scientists and engineers are lying about the project. You also have to believe that millions of scientists across the world from every country on Earth, even America's enemies, are willingly joining in on the conspiracy just to make America look good. Even scientists are too stupid to see through America's lies, while you know better than them having thought though that shyt for 20 seconds when you haven't even stepped foot inside a NASA base before.



That's actually one of the biggest cases for it being true. Even the Soviets had to acknowledge that the USA got to the moon first. It was a huge L for them and a propaganda win for the USA at a time when they were NOT taking L's from the USA. I mean, two years later they damn near went to nuclear war with us, but you don't think they're gonna tell the world that the moon landing was fake?




Watch a 1959 movies and then tell me how fake that looked. They weren't remotely that good at faking film yet.

What do you want us to do there? It's a ball of rock and it's expensive as hell to send people back and forth. We got the basic samples, you think we'll keep going that far out just to take more selfies?




You're being smart-dumb now.

In the 1900s we could pilot planes but we couldn't make a movie in color.

In the 1910s we could fly non-stop across the Atlantic Ocean. But we couldn't even add dialogue to a film yet.

In the 1940s we could create atomic weapons that could destroy entire cities and sent entire flights of bombers across the Pacific Ocean. But the pinnicle of special effects was gluing a fin to a baby crocodile and making it fight a lizard.



THAT was the Best Special Effects Oscar winner for 1940. Many people consider it the greatest sci-fi movie of the 1940s. THAT is the level of film-making we're talking about.




This is the movie that won the best special effects Oscar in 1959, the year we landed on the moon:





This is Forbidden Planet, widely recognized as the greatest space movie of the 1950s





In order to believe the moon landing was faked, you not only have to believe that literally tens of thousands of NASA employees were simultaneously lying about what they were working on without ANY leaks, and that millions of scientists around the world are caping for them, but also that NASA secretly developed cutting-edge film technology far ahead of what anyone anywhere in the world was doing at the time. So you've literally created a cutting-edge technological innovation in order to claim that the other cutting-edge technology innovation is fake.

:mjlol:


NASA is compartmentlized dummy. Like the rest of the military. Only a few at the top know what is really going on. In the 1940s you had over 100,000 people working on the Manhattan Project and barely anyone knew they were creating the first atomic bomb.

All the normal people at NASA were probably not told what they were doing was fake. The only people who knew the fraud were the astronauts. And its no surprise that all the Apollo astronauts were Freemasons. And I dare you to watch the first interview after Neil Armstrong and them allegedly returned from the moon.

That interview exposes the hoax. Neil and the guys didn't look like they just accomplished the greatest achievement in human history. Anyone with sense can see they were lying. Also it explains why Neil Armstrong dissapeared from the public eye after the alleged moon landings. He was embrassed by the hoax and hid from the public eye till his death.
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
3,922
Reputation
1,692
Daps
12,369
None of these cats would be calling the moon landings fake if Dr. Frances Cress-Welsing's brother-in-law was never killed and flew in one of the Apollo missions. I won't even mentioned the black men and women scientists who were crucial to Apollo's success.
 

Canon

Veteran
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
23,486
Reputation
2,524
Daps
90,859
Steph Curry proving he's smart.

Only an idiot believes in the moon landings.

Hell its questionable if the moon is even a solid object. Its most likely a projection of some kind.
:jbhmm:i always find your post interesting

who is projecting it and what would be the reason for it?

On another note i remember you talking to me about meditation and how it can effect our world. I picked up a book by Pam Grout called E-Squared. You fukk with it?
 
Top