Stimulus & Bailout Watch Thread

[the cac mamba]

Trump was on record of saying he wanted a big stimulus, the Dems pass multiple packages...again, if Mitch was so shook, why didn't Donald make him pass one of the bills or at the very least put one of the bills passed by the House on the Senate floor for a vote?

its crazy how you refuse to admit that nancy should have taken a 1.8 trillion dollar bill, when we now know that she had nothing to lose and is getting 900 billion at most

im sorry to inform you of this, but unless 900 billion is more than 1.8 trillion, you have no argument. you literally have no reason to say she shouldnt have just taken it. NOTHING would have been lost

let pelosi off your face and come up for some air. even if what you're saying is true about the republican senate (which it isnt), the dems would still be in the same exact place negotiation wise

actually thats not true. if nancy took the deal and the republican senate shot it down like you claim, the dems might control the senate right now

 

[Hood Critic]

its crazy how you refuse to admit that nancy should have taken a 1.8 trillion dollar bill, when we now know that she had nothing to lose and is getting 900 billion at most

im sorry to inform you of this, but unless 900 billion is more than 1.8 trillion, you have no argument. you literally have no reason to say she shouldnt have just taken it. NOTHING would have been lost

let pelosi off your face and come up for some air. even if what you're saying is true about the republican senate (which it isnt), the dems would still be in the same exact place negotiation wise

actually thats not true. if nancy took the deal and the republican senate shot it down like you claim, the dems might control the senate right now

So you're not going to address the fact that you claimed Trump was going to make the Senate do something that the Majority Leader openly said he wouldn't do?

This has nothing to do with Nancy Pelosi and all these magical "ifs" you want to discuss.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

stop juelzing and just say it, you want the republican stimulus. you're a debt hawk

By his own logic, there is no reason for Rethuglicans to want liability protection other than to suck corporate dikk.

But apparently the onus is on Democrats to give in to yet another handout to corporations that they don't even need.

 

[the cac mamba]

So you're not going to address the fact that you claimed Trump was going to make the Senate do something that the Majority Leader openly said he wouldn't do?

This has nothing to do with Nancy Pelosi and all these magical "ifs" you want to discuss.

it all stemmed from pelosi taking it or not

pelosi taking the deal COMPLETELY changes the dynamic overnight and makes non-passage completely the fault of the republican senate right before the election

and if they were gonna shoot it down like you said, then what the fukk did she have to lose? your position is absolutely retarded

why not take it? what would have been lost? all this awesome leverage to now get 700 billion in december?

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

no porridge????????????

 

[God Almighty]

 

[Hood Critic]

it all stemmed from pelosi taking it or not

pelosi taking the deal COMPLETELY changes the dynamic overnight and makes non-passage completely the fault of the republican senate right before the election

and if they were gonna shoot it down like you said, then what the fukk did she have to lose? your position is absolutely retarded

why not take it? what would have been lost? all this awesome leverage to now get 700 billion in december?

McConnell decides to sit at the table, chances are high you're going to get a deal. When he doesn't sit at the table, you've seen what the results are. But you want to keep talking about Nancy Pelosi's conversations with the only person who would deal with her for months, who clearly had no authority because nothing got done.

 

[the cac mamba]

McConnell decides to sit at the table, chances are high you're going to get a deal. When he doesn't sit at the table, you've seen what the results are. But you want to keep talking about Nancy Pelosi's conversations with the only person who would deal with her for months, who clearly had no authority because nothing got done.

nothing got done because she didnt take it you cant just let your hubris get in the way of common sense

now that we know shes getting this trash, 900 billion bill tops; what did pelosi have to lose by taking the 1.8 trillion?

 

[88m3]

The Trump Administration Allowed Aviation Companies to Take Bailout Funds and Lay Off Workers, Says House Report — ProPublica

 

[88m3]

Joel Osteen's Texas megachurch received $4.4M COVID-19 stimulus loan

 

[Hood Critic]

nothing got done because she didnt take it you cant just let your hubris get in the way of common sense

now that we know shes getting this trash, 900 billion bill tops; what did pelosi have to lose by taking the 1.8 trillion?

She didn't take it because there was nothing for her to take, this has been explained to you.

 

[the cac mamba]

She didn't take it because there was nothing for her to take, this has been explained to you.

no, that's your lie to excuse her

shes on tape saying she didnt take it because it wasnt enough money

 

[FAH1223]

 

[NYChase718]

Same old 1 liners

 

[NYChase718]