Stop Looking At the Plus/Minus Stats to Guage Player Effectiveness

Po pimp

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,481
Reputation
2,859
Daps
56,413
Reppin
Chi-Town
So Greek Freak had the largest negative (-17) in the entire game against Cleveland. So does that mean it’s his fault the Bucks lost? Analatyic nerds have ruined basketball. GMs actually look at these stats to determine whether they’ll sign a player or not. Players will be stigmatized as "not playing winning basketball" when everyone else in the lineup with them is trash.
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
29,314
Reputation
9,760
Daps
82,658
So Greek Freak had the largest negative (-17) in the entire game against Cleveland. So does that mean it’s his fault the Bucks lost? Analatyic nerds have ruined basketball. GMs actually look at these stats to determine whether they’ll sign a player or not. Players will be stigmatized as "not playing winning basketball" when everyone else in the lineup with them is trash.

you have to take into context stars vs bench/role players obviously but it says alot when your star player(s) has the worst impact on the game/team even when getting numbers.
 

Po pimp

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,481
Reputation
2,859
Daps
56,413
Reppin
Chi-Town
That’s not analytics. Plus minus has always been around. There is something to be said when a team plays better without you than with you which clearly ain’t the case with Antetokounmpo and you damn sure can’t determine stuff like this off one game
That falls on the coaching, not a single player. Certain lineups simply don’t work as well. Plus/minus is a flawed way to determine player impact, period. Lonzo Ball was the reason the Lakers won, yet he had the lowest plus/minus in that entire starting lineup.
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,623
Reputation
10,202
Daps
218,101
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
That falls on the coaching, not a single player. Certain lineups simply don’t work as well. Plus/minus is a flawed way to determine player impact, period. Lonzo Ball was the reason the Lakers won, yet he had the lowest plus/minus in that entire starting lineup.

They have stats that show how good certain lineups are when they're on the court, but (gasp) that's analytics.
 
Top