According to Otis, during a performance, Eddie, Paul, and Melvin were doing their dance steps and when Otis started to join them Al pulled him aside and told him to let them handle the dance steps "while we look pretty (pause) for the bytches."I look at all the gripes like this:
nikkas liked that Temptations movie right?
What if they knew Blue actually died in the hospital after weeks of deteriorating health, not suddenly after rolling into the kitchen?
Or that Ruffin wasnt actually smoking crack because the Reunion tour was in '82 and crack didn't emerge until '84-'85?
Or that the dude Al didn't get kicked out the group after hittin' Paul in the head with the bottle, but after a SECOND incident?
Or that... y'all get the point.
Obviously everything ain't gonna be to the tee... but when you got 2 and a half hours to cover like 9 years... I think they did a great damn job. There's things that coulda been a lil tighter/better, but in a biopic, some of the more meticulous details are gonna get melded together. Really the only thing I think was really left out was the Dre Day/Real Gs timeframe... even if it only got a minute or two, it'd been a notable addition.
at the fact NWA are being portrayed as just a few kids whom made it out the hood and were persecuted by racist cops and government for speaking their truth
.Yeah cause of the raps bout NWA dropping bodies on wax were reality tales,the man didn't fund NWA careers, and glorifying black on black genocide angers and scares the white power structure










. No "Dre Day" no nothing and I figured rather than showing Dre work on Nothin but a G thang for no reason, they should've showed him working on Dre Day
is that his whole history is out there already, so who is he REALLY trying to convince? why even lie and fabricate your personality, when everybody knows already Dre aint about that life unless it concerns women. And Eazy wouldn't be sad about a Chronic billboard, because he was making money off that album. And Ruthless was still successful after Dre left