Study: No Link Between Contact Sports And Brain Disease

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,793
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
MAYWOOD, Ill. (CBSDC) – There is not enough evidence to establish a link between football and the increase risk of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), says a new study.

Previous information had shown that National Football League players may be at a higher risk of death associated with Alzheimer’s and other impairments of the brain and nervous system than the general U.S. Population.

But researchers from Loyola University Medical Center are reporting only limited evidence showing a link between the two.

A previous study, of 3,439 retired NFL players, who played at least 5 seasons between 1959 and 1988, researchers found that the overall risk of death associated with neurodegenerative disorders was three times higher among these retired than players than the general U.S. population. Alzheimer’s disease and ALS was four times higher for the NFL players.

Christopher Randolph, a PhD from Loyola, and a professor in the university’s Department of Neurology, and Stella Karantzoulis, PhD, of New York University School of Medicine, found that suicide rates were actually substantially lower among the athletes than the general population. “Given that suicidality is described as a key feature of CTE, this finding is difficult to reconcile with the high rates of CTE that have been speculated to occur in these retired athletes,” Karantzoulis and Randolph write in their study. “It is likely that there are a diverse set of risk factors for suicidality, such as life stress, financial difficulty, depression, chronic pain, and drug abuse, in retired athletes.”

Karantzoulis and Randolph examined symptoms of retired NFL players who had mild cognitive impairment and said that symptoms seen in the retired players were virtually the same as those observed in non-athletes. They write that these findings cast doubt on the notion that CTE is a novel condition unique to athletes who have experienced concussions.


Previous studies sugest that trauma triggers progressive degeneration of the brain tissue, including the build-up of an abnormal protein called tau. The brain degeneration is associated with memory loss, confusion, impaired judgment, impulse control problems, aggression, depression, and progressive dementia.

Karantzoulis and Randolph write that the presence of abnormal tau proteins in the brain may not be a reliable indicator of CTE. “Older persons without dementia can accumulate Alzheimer’s disease pathology without any associated cognitive or clinical symptoms,” they write in their study. “The actual clinical significance of ‘abnormal’ tau deposition in the brains of retired athletes therefore remains unclear.”

“One cannot deny that boxing and other contact sports can potentially result in some type of injury to the brain,” Karantzoulis and Randolph go on to write. “Three currently are no carefully controlled data, however, to indicate a definitive association between sport-related concussion and increased risk for late-life cognitive and neuropsychiatric impairment of any form.”

Boston University defines CTE as a progressive generative disease of the brain found in athletes with a history of repetitive brain trauma, including symptomatic concussions as well as asymptomatic subconcussive hits to the head.

The study titled “Modern Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in Retired Athletes: What is the Evidence?,” which showed limited evidence between sports concussions and an increased risk of late-life cognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments, was published in the journal Neuropsychology Review.

---
---

Two thoughts of mine:

1) Smoke, drink, party, inject, stress yourself to mental retardation, brehs. Blame it on football rather than your unhealthy lifestyle.

2)Refuse to wait for more evidence via additional studies and jump to conclusions about the alleged link between CTE and football, brehs. Pretend to care about football players, meanwhile rant against football because you're an piece-of-shyt ideologue that frankly doesn't like football. Accept any evidence that confirms your own beliefs while rejecting counter evidence which doesn't. Be an intellectually dishonest actor.
 
Last edited:

ThugLife

Diehard Jimmy Buckets fan
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,206
Reputation
3,105
Daps
49,134
Reppin
I bought a Carbon 15 when I was 18
hOOufaE.gif


Yea OK
 

Greenstrings

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
1,829
Reputation
480
Daps
3,664
You think this one study somehow negates the many other studies that do show correlation? :what:

You think that the scientific peer review process is about polemics and that your bias plays no role in the conclusions that you're coming to? :what:

You think footballers who live longer and are healthier than the general population get neurological diseases from smoking drinking and partying? :what:

Where are your stats on the % of footballers doing these things? :what:

You think it is not worth mentioning that the NFL donated $30 million to the organisation that commissioned the study? :what:
http://www.nih.gov/news/health/sep2012/od-05.htm
 

Steezy

Career 13 ppg scorer
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
23,800
Reputation
1,681
Daps
55,253
Reppin
Old Atlanta
so every week can take hits to to head at speeds of up to 20 mph wearing nothing but
11-10049.jpg

and ill be okay :ohhh:
 

boskey

Top Rankin
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,499
Reputation
3,821
Daps
63,711
You expect us to believe this "study" like we didn't watch Rocky 4 5 and 6. Brain damage is not new... :camby:
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,793
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
You think this one study somehow negates the many other studies that do show correlation? :what:

You actually smart enough to have read said studies. What are the noted correlations?

You think that the scientific peer review process is about polemics and that your bias plays no role in the conclusions that you're coming to? :what:

Absolutely not. In fact I know the peer review process is not impartial and can devolve into polemics. There are disciplines where this is normal, and the more controversial and political an issue is, the more likely bias plays a role.

You think footballers who live longer and are healthier than the general population get neurological diseases from smoking drinking and partying? :what:

Not necessarily, though it is a possibility demographic factors have something to do with it.

Where are your stats on the % of footballers doing these things? :what:

To be real with you, I haven't read the studies.

You think it is not worth mentioning that the NFL donated $30 million to the organisation that commissioned the study? :what:
http://www.nih.gov/news/health/sep2012/od-05.htm

That link doesn't say the NFL specifically gave money to Loyola researchers. It says the NFL is funding research on "serious medical conditions" relating to athletes in general. In that sense, are you going to distrust every research article which may have received money from the NFL in this way? We don't know if Loyola is one of the patrons and even if they are, that doesn't necessarily mean their study conclusions are invalid or inaccurate. We should first evaluate the study on the merits of its methodology, subject number, etc. Then we can talk about conflicting issues.
 
Top