1/11
@mattyglesias
I keep having conversations where people speculate about when AI will be able to do things that AI can already do.
2/11
@CostcoSwizzle
AI can do loads of things 98% well, but if you have complex input and output, you spend more time auditing the 2% than if you had just done the thing yourself in the first place.
3/11
@BillyLincoln10
I wondered when AI would be able to replace an underwriter entirely. Decided to find out how far away we are. I spent 90 minutes playing around with Grok. At the end of that I had a complete digital underwriter. I was shocked. I still am. I now have infinite staff.
4/11
@bdmarotta
Conversations? You mean published articles by journalists?
5/11
@scottdavisCRE
I will be interested in when AI can replicate results without wildly fabricating them with “helpful completions.”
6/11
@AaronErickson
The upside is I feel like I am an agent from the future when people ask me what I do for a living, which is kinda fun.
7/11
@GrdDscntN2Madnz
To be fair, it's hard to keep up
8/11
@Raynorus
I'll tell you right now, it cant pass chem 105
9/11
@iamarsibragimov
AI achieving what capability is misunderstood; realism matters
10/11
@StillCompeting
In many ways the real questing is: When will people let AI do what it can do, and what is the path to getting there?
11/11
@NateSilver538
There's a lot of room to disagree on where AI will end up in (1, 2, 5, 10, 20 etc.) years but I don't think I've seen a subject where a cohort of people who like to think of themselves as highly literate and well informed are so proud of their ignorance.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196