southpawstyle
Superstar
Nice emojis ya fukkin homo
Correct.This bullshyt cost us the election, thanks SCOTUS...
You’re agreeing with an Indian and a cac but low-key those are the motherfukkers who would agree with this shytUnfortunately, fools like the guy you quoted can't understand such a premise. It's people like the fool you quoted that many ordinary people can't stand the left and the Democrat party today.
I’m black.You’re agreeing with an Indian and a cac but low-key those are the motherfukkers who would agree with this shyt
I don’t give a fukk who you like. You don’t like Trehs fair enough. You’re still fukking wrong.
So I know this might be hard but try to wrap your head around the idea that it’s violating the constitution and their own legal precedent for them tell parents what they can and cannot be done with their children.
So don’t act like you’re not the dumb motherfukker in the conversation. You’re just so caught up on Trehs you don’t want to know.
Also feel free to quote or @ me. I don’t give a fukk. It don’t matter what we think. This shyt is just another decision that goes against decades of decisions before. Just cause ya’ll don’t like Trehs doesn’t mean the SC isn’t on their normal bullshyt.
Do you believe children can be transgender?
OK. Since you believe kids can be transgender. Do you think kids should transition as soon as possible since you believe its a disorder to be addressed?Yes. Now what, you Indian dikk sucker.
hilarious that we literally have THOUSANDS of laws in place protecting children; but for making a kid wait until he's 18 to do something as extreme as cut his dikk off, you would classify that as "republicans being on bullshyt", because the Democrats are perceived as taking a loss hereJust cause ya’ll don’t like Trehs doesn’t mean the SC isn’t on their normal bullshyt.
OK. Since you believe kids can be transgender. Do you think kids should transition as soon as possible since you believe its a disorder to be addressed?
I’m also a straight black male. Just clearing that up.
but what about all these so called "trans kids" who are just temporarily confused, being groomed and coerced by sick adults, and regret this shyt later? or kids who are just gay?In short the question isn't whether trans kids exist. They do.
Until the 1970s with modern surgical techniques was only then “transition” possible? Until then it was bad costume of people toying with sex and gender roles.
No, I don't think kids should transition as soon as possible. Trans stuff is still generally labeled as a mental health issue in our healthcare system. Addressing it starts with therapy in 99.9% of cases. Getting approved for permanent medical surgeries as a child is rare, it's not like kids are getting their dikks cut off by the tens of thousands.
This is not some new thing, it's literally been around since Egypt and Greek/Roman eras. The phenomena of increased trans rates among children does not surprise me because of how we incentivize identity-based descriptions, and how that ties into children (and adults) seeking attention. But you would be a fool to argue children cannot have ADHD because some children mimic those behaviors in order to garner attention or avoid things they dislike (school). The same thing is happening here: the more identities you can acquire, the more privilege you acquire in our current online society. A lot of these people fall out of this stuff later in their teenage years. Which is why permanent things like surgery should be avoided in most cases.
In short the question isn't whether trans kids exist. They do. The question is why is our online society bleeding into the real world, how do you remove the incentives that increase this, and how lenient can medical providers be without being too lenient.
This is what pisses gay people off apparently. They feel a lot of GAY kids are being pushed to transition then regretting it but then it’s too late and they’ve done mental and physical harm to themselves.but what about all these so called "trans kids" who are just temporarily confused, and regret this shyt later? or kids who are just gay?
there's far more of them, than there are kids who are actually mentally ill. don't you think the math would make sense, to just make them all wait until they're 18, to engage in such drastic behavior? like we do with countless other issues involving kids?
i don't even care about this issue, past the extent to which it's damaged the Democrats' image. but the constant assault on common sense from this lobby is nauseating, and the fact that Dems are just expected to defend whatever insane nonsense they trot out on a weekly basis....when is enough, enough?
it would have been UNTHINKABLE to expect Dems to defend shyt like this, not even 5 years ago![]()
look at the framing on this issue, from the most powerful Dem in the countryThis is what pisses gay people off apparently. They feel a lot of GAY kids are being pushed to transition then regretting it but then it’s too late and they’ve done mental and physical harm to themselves.