Tallahassee: A White man pulls Gun on young AA dos visiting their white friends' apartment

[GoAggieGo.]

Aggie, you know there is nothing wrong with rapping your shyt. That's good but some of this shyt is just nikkas babble. This ain't ending white supremacy

Neither is us knowing you’re Nigerian or anyone else letting us know their ethnicity or heritage, but it’s still done. Why do you have a problem with the OP stating the guy is an AA, when we clearly know you’d have no issue with anyone else doing the same? In the Luvvie thread, I don’t remember you taking issue with her or Amanda having their flags flying.

Is it “babble” when AA’s want to do the same? The main story was overlooked because folks either didn’t like the AAdos name or were offended by it, but there’s been other topics on here where blacks that had different nationalities and ethnicities were announced, and there was no problem. What’s the problem?

 

[T'krm]

Pos rep incoming!

All these nikkas proudly rep their ethnicity and heritage, broadcast their flags, but when AA’s do it, it’s “y’all are being divisive.”

If we’re going to do this “we all black” thing, then let’s really do it. Don’t tell me to do something, when you can’t even adhere to what you’re telling me to do.

As for the topic at hand, it’s tough that he had to go through that. It’s going to continue happening, as whites are more emboldened than ever.

You see this shyt?!?! Over a lablel...a fukkin label!! These dudes could've been killed, but this is what ppl are outraged about??
They can't adhere to it, bc they not 'all in', point black. 'We all Black' is one-sided as ever.

 

[Clayton Endicott]

He finna catch Tripple Ls?

Hopefully he winds up committing that.

 

[GoAggieGo.]

How so? You got nikkas attacking peoples parents, you got terms like abed being used, you got nikkas talking shyt. It might not be you that's the issue but this thread damn sure is an issue

Well now you need to ask yourself who’s doing the dividing and conquering, because it clearly wasn’t the OP. He just simply identified the victims ethnicity and nationality. You might need to take a look at those who took offense to the title.

 

[T'krm]

Well now you need to ask yourself who’s doing the dividing and conquering, because it clearly wasn’t the OP. He just simply identified the victims ethnicity and nationality. You might need to take a look at those who took offense to the title.

Appreciate that. But any rational person can see that was ALL I did, and all I usually do!
Subsequent fires were self starters

 

[#1 pick]

Neither is us knowing you’re Nigerian or anyone else letting us know their ethnicity or heritage, but it’s still done. Why do you have a problem with the OP stating the guy is an AA, when we clearly know you’d have no issue with anyone else doing the same? In the Luvvie thread, I don’t remember you taking issue with her or Amanda having their flags flying.

Is it “babble” when AA’s want to do the same? The main story was overlooked because folks either didn’t like the AAdos name or were offended by it, but there’s been other topics on here where blacks that had different nationalities and ethnicities were announced, and there was no problem. What’s the problem?

Let's start here:

1. We dont know what the brehs in the video are. We just know their Black.
2. I dont recall speaking positively about Luvvie or Amanda on this site ever. Anything else just isn't truthful. I personally hate them talking on behalf of non DoS and on DoS behalf.
3. Attacking nikkas parents, calling nikkas names cacs say and doing the most isnt honest engagement, it's just divisiveness and hate.

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

@Barnett114 can you move this to The Root

 

[HarlemHottie]

HH, chill sis, you know better than this divide and conquer shyt

Sweep up your own front yard before you get to worrying about mine.

 

[CoryMack]

Nah I don't mean to come at you. I've seen other people say this before on here.

I don't know much about what was going on in Africa at the time or America's immigration policy at the time.

Oh I didn’t take it that way, I was just wrong. I was speaking more since the end of the civil rights movement coming forward to today. Those that came were able to benefit because of the work those who’d been here had done.

 

[HarlemHottie]

Well now you need to ask yourself who’s doing the dividing and conquering, because it clearly wasn’t the OP. He just simply identified the victims ethnicity and nationality. You might need to take a look at those who took offense to the title.

They trynna gaslight us.

 

[GoAggieGo.]

Let's start here:

1. We dont know what the brehs in the video are. We just know their Black.
2. I dont recall speaking positively about Luvvie or Amanda on this site ever. Anything else just isn't truthful. I personally hate them talking on behalf of non DoS and on DoS behalf.
3. Attacking nikkas parents, calling nikkas names cacs say and doing the most isnt honest engagement, it's just divisiveness and hate.

You’re attacking the OP all throughout this thread. Maybe I missed it, but where in the opening post did he attack anyone? The attacking clearly started with folks coming at him pointing at his potential ethnicity. Posts in which you dapped, so it’s clear you took issue with the name.
2. You might not have spoke positively, but was one of your criticisms of them the flags on their twitter accounts? I don’t believe so, so I’m assuming you had no issue with it. I can assume that because you clearly had an issue with ole boy pointing out the victims potential ethnicity.
3. I don’t condone any attacks on people’s parents, relatives, and I’m not really for the name calling. I don’t really participate with that on here.

This thread became divisive because folks didn’t like the description of the victim, and it’s as simple as that.

 

[#1 pick]

You’re attacking the OP all throughout this thread. Maybe I missed it, but where in the opening post did he attack anyone? The attacking clearly started with folks coming at him pointing at his potential ethnicity. Posts in which you dapped, so it’s clear you took issue with the name.
2. You might not have spoke positively, but was one of your criticisms of them the flags on their twitter accounts? I don’t believe so, so I’m assuming you had no issue with it. I can assume that because you clearly had an issue with ole boy pointing out the victims potential ethnicity.
3. I don’t condone any attacks on people’s parents, relatives, and I’m not really for the name calling. I don’t really participate with that on here.

This thread became divisive because folks didn’t like the description of the victim, and it’s as simple as that.

1. Stay on topic. Is this thread divisive or not?
2. Why mention this, it wasn't a subject nor is it relative? You are picking straws. There is nothing here, if I attacked their actions, that states i wasn't for their bullshyt.
3. If you are not down with #3, you should find this thread to be divisive like I do.

 

[YoungMoneyCashMoneyBoy]

"Mi no black papi...i afro puerto rican"

Look at you. Scared and ashamed to claim that you're black. You're the head clown in this circus of a thread.

Is your skin black/brown? Or are you a white skinned, slick haired cac looking fakkit?

Can't even answer this question T'krm. Cac fakkit.

You have to be a student of black history to know that the downfall of every great black group are agents of division such as this cac who can't even say that he is black. The UNIA, Nation of Islam and Black Panther Party all infiltrated by agents of division. OP is even worse because he's doing this for free on his spare time.

All his little backers will ignore him sidestepping the question and stay in line.

 

[T'krm]

Let's start here:

1. We dont know what the brehs in the video are. We just know their Black.
2. I dont recall speaking positively about Luvvie or Amanda on this site ever. Anything else just isn't truthful. I personally hate them talking on behalf of non DoS and on DoS behalf.
3. Attacking nikkas parents, calling nikkas names cacs say and doing the most isnt honest engagement, it's just divisiveness and hate.

1. Dos Famu students confirmed. But that a deflection. You don't care about that.
2.Excuses. Have Never seen you chide other groups when their label is announced? In fact show us where u have EVER done so, and challenged their loyalty to 'Blackness' in doing so. Only work urself up when AA do it.
3.If all those are proof being 'divisive, and hate' Why do it to me?
More than enuff evidence to convict YOU!!

 

[#1 pick]

1. Dos Famu students. Deflection regardless, you don't care about that
2.Excuses. Have Never seen you chide other groups for their groups label being announced, in fact show us where u have EVER done so, and challenged their loyalty to 'Blackness' in doing so. Only work urself up when AA do it.
3.If all those are proof being 'divisive, and hate' Why do it to me?
More than enuff evidence to convict YOU!!

1. Are you sure? Unless you know them and their lineage, you just a shyt talking wannabe Black Rosie Perez
2. nikka babble
3. Abeg? You said that shyt right? fukking cac