Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED

[BlaKcMoney]

corey holcomb would destroy schulz in 5 minutes

 

[#1 pick]

Instead of token, Tariq should be using the term "outlier" at times.

Whenever we speak on Black poverty, racists whites will throw out Oprah or LeBron. They aren't exactly tokens but they are outliers.

I think he confuses the two.

They are kinda the same if the term is differently frame. Outliers who are Black are token Blacks. Sometimes we think of tokens as those c00ns in white movies.

 

[JahBuhLun]

You can't list all those power positions, say that blacks hold those positions, then limit your one example to black police.

I agree that the levels are even close right now, however, to say that they don't exist is something else(in know you aren't saying that, but that is the argument)

I was using Black police as the quick example, I could've broken down all of those positions and the point would still be true and valid. I've never heard of or come across a Black person in a position of power who denied a white person anything solely because they were white. That doesn't mean that it doesn't happen, but it wouldn't happen in a systematic, acceptable way. Yet, we know that whites created laws stifling Black progress, and the just because there are civil rights laws on the books, that doesn't mean white people don't find work-arounds.

 

[MostReal]

His ENTIRE argument was that "not everything is white supremacy" then couldn't prove what wasn't

Over and over again Shultz was asked, "well what wasn't" and he had not one credible answer.
It was pretty pathetic

 

[AJaRuleStan]

You weren't clear. You was on some Oswald Bates ish.

I cited and highlighted the specific talking point that served as the subject matter of my entire post right at the start of it.

>equal resources for every group

I then accurately detailed Tariq's exact position in relation to that specific subject matter.

Now you may be triggered or disagree with my stance on what was stated, but you can not claim it was not detailed or precise in meaning, unless you're a fgt.

 

[#1 pick]

I cited and highlighted the specific talking point that served as the subject matter of my entire post right at the start of it.



I then accurately detailed Tariq's exact position in relation to that specific subject matter.

Now you may be triggered or disagree with my stance on what was stated, but you can not claim it was not detailed or precise in meaning, unless you're a fgt.

That doesn't fall in-line with your first paragraph.

 

[JahBuhLun]

Tariq lost points every time he suggested that a black person in who managed to be in a position of influence or power was a "Token". That's a weak argument, which proved Andrew's point.

If it's one Black person, then they are considered a token. A lot of corporations will have 1 Black person sitting on the board of directors, or that one Black manager. Athletes are not tokens, coaches tend to be token hires. Oprah started off as a token but flipped it on people by finessing white women.

 

[Bernie Madoff]

2 idiots

 

[#1 pick]

The last 20 minutes is a disaster. It seems like Schulz went into full supertroll and Tariq started hitting the Juelz special but neither gave each other a chance to talk at the end.

 

[An ashy lil fap hand]

That was a good conversation, although Andrew was a bit rude. More things like this should happen. I just don't believe in broadcasting it.

 

[AJaRuleStan]

That doesn't fall in-line with your first paragraph.

How? Around 1:15 mins or so into the youtube clip, Schulz asks Tariq what would have to be found or seen in reality for him to conclude that white supremacy isn't true. His gold standard was equal treatment and equal resources. He then illuminates his stance even more when he presents the question about why isn't the amount of wealthy black families more in norm with the amount that white ppl have as way to illustrate his meaning regarding resources and equality. And if you take the implication from his logic, he is claiming that group disparities is a result of foul play by the majority(whites in this case), and if removed, the disparities wouldn't exist - hence my entire first paragraph. Everything follows.

 

[kingofnyc]

Up to the last 20 minutes and I couldn't take anymore. Trust that I waited and clicked play and anticipating TN to school him. It was an upset victory for AS.

Still fukk him though.

Thing is with most black people, me included, speak very narrow-minded. I watch TN but sometimes he says things that have me like .

Black persons in America do not care to research and look at things from both sides. TN didn't anticipate AS arguments.

Racism in America is worse now than it's ever been. Really?

The case is things didn't improve much or at the rate it should have for black people. That doesn't take a lot of intelligence to say.

that's where Tariq played himself - with that said he still won, cause Shultz is a complete dikkhead

 

[OG Talk]

They are kinda the same if the term is differently frame. Outliers who are Black are token Blacks. Sometimes we think of tokens as those c00ns in white movies.

This is the way I see it.

Ben Carson the neuro surgeon is an outlier ( a position earned through his own hard work, intelect and talent)

Ben Carson as HUD Secretary is a token. (Placed there is a powerless symbol by white supremacists)

I don't think what Oprah has accomplished so far can be described as tokenism..

 

[Cadillac]

its pure struggle hearing these nikkas debate.

Tariq really struggled with that Nigerian question

he could have said any ole shyt about them

like how the best come from the country

or how immigrants that come from good stable/powerful/etc countries tend to have a good connection and relatives in America and get a head start

any ole Bullshyt Tariq CMON

Schulz is an idiot you could have said anything

 

[Cadillac]

after the nigerian question he seems to be doing ok