loyola llothta
☭☭☭
His wife/girlfriend is black
Tariq Nasheed vs Andrew Schulz on The Brilliant Idiots...VIDEO ADDED
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Indiglow Meta (R$G)
Ultra.
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
Yeah she's some Canadian bedwench
He softened him up by kissing his ass and then proceeded to try to shyt on him.
Tariq did body him because he summed up Shulzes whole stance "im white and i say so" After every segment he was speaking on Tariq's behalf on some "We both came to the conclusion that _______________" Tariq was like no we didnt
i don't think corey would even debate with schultz.
i know i wouldn't.
corey would destroy schultz with the most profoundly rudimentary analogies, then schultz would try to refute it then corey would just give him the "nikka please" look.
i dunno guys i would want to beat the breaks off schultz.'
he represents the quintessential liberal (progressive) white male's thought process. i used to listen to the podcast but as i got mmore knowledgeable about race, politics, gender issues, psychology, i had to stop watching.
it's a bunch a nonsense babble from one idiot (schultz) who dons that monicker to mask the fact he truly feels that he's "brilliant", while charlamagne has that intellectual humility real intellects have, which manifests itself as a sincere journey of discovery for truth.
If Tariq loves his wife and children, then he loves their mother/grandmother too right? I mean he's happy peanuts father was a c00n right?
White supremacy will end as soon as the blackest of our brothers stop swooning over lite brights, mulatos, pawgs and asians. Simple as that. But being oppressed under an evil black ruler is a much bigger mindf*ck imo. On a psychological level it's similar to getting raped by an older family member.
what?B!tchuoffendingme
Superstar
Listened to most of it. This Cac Schulz is slick.
His whole strategy
1. Assert something
2. Argue it's a fact until a rebuttal proves otherwise. When that happens..
3. Play dumb. Pretend not to understand the logic of the rebuttal.
4. Force a point by point breakdown of the logic behind it
5. Midway through that breakdown, distort what's being said to get the other guy off track from his original argument or
6. Pick out a random couple of words from what the other guy is saying, then flip the conversation to a different topic
7. Repeat steps 1 through 2, then 2 through 6 as needed.
This is what happens when you argue with people who arent seeking clarity, they basically troll you to death and thats what Schulz is a MASTER at.
His whole strategy
1. Assert something
2. Argue it's a fact until a rebuttal proves otherwise. When that happens..
3. Play dumb. Pretend not to understand the logic of the rebuttal.
4. Force a point by point breakdown of the logic behind it
5. Midway through that breakdown, distort what's being said to get the other guy off track from his original argument or
6. Pick out a random couple of words from what the other guy is saying, then flip the conversation to a different topic
7. Repeat steps 1 through 2, then 2 through 6 as needed.
This is what happens when you argue with people who arent seeking clarity, they basically troll you to death and thats what Schulz is a MASTER at.
LogicFirst
Banned
When Trump officially ki
Tariq is more well read than Schultz but Schultz was acting like he's a Yale professor but really he's just Charlemagne's little homie.He softened him up by kissing his ass and then proceeded to try to shyt on him.
Tariq did body him because he summed up Shulzes whole stance "im white and i say so" After every segment he was speaking on Tariq's behalf on some "We both came to the conclusion that _______________" Tariq was like no we didnt
LogicFirst
Banned
Tariq clearly won because he had more examples and anecdotes. However, Tariq should have conceded that blacks are better off today than 50 years ago.
LogicFirst
Banned
Schultz "You're blinded by trying to prove white supremacy all the time." Stopped listening when he dropped this bullshyt. Black people don't look for white supremacy it looks for us. Always watching, always inflicting its double standard. Schultz still never identified one area of life that isn't affected by white supremacy.
B!tchuoffendingme
Superstar
That Harvard study Schulz cited at the end was shyt on by a Prof from that the author's own university. He looked at shootings from just couple of police precincts and didnt sample a wide enough area. So Tariq was right, Schulz was talking bullshyt.
Its widely accepted (even by Cac journos) unarmed Blacks are 3.5x more likely to get shot by cops than Whites.
Its widely accepted (even by Cac journos) unarmed Blacks are 3.5x more likely to get shot by cops than Whites.
K.O.N.Y
Superstar
what about how whites mixed white supremacy and christianity to subdue the slaves?
LogicFirst
Banned
Not to mention the Klan burned crosses and cited the bible to support segregation
LogicFirst
Banned
Meth been been around forever they just called it "speed" instead."Meth has been around since 1887 btw"
Basically backing Tariq's point. Charlamagne's first un-c00n statement in a minute