In The Zone '98
Superstar
As a grown man, you can't see the context in what he's talking about?
Why does this clip have to be explained every six months?
SEE SEE, TARIQ SAID WHITE PEOPLE ARE SMARTER!!!!
Tariq Nasheed vs IQ Theorist
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
As a grown man, you can't see the context in what he's talking about?
Why does this clip have to be explained every six months?
SEE SEE, TARIQ SAID WHITE PEOPLE ARE SMARTER!!!!
Buddy
FAIA (Foundational African In America) 😤
As a grown man, have you ever defended another grown man like this?
In The Zone '98
Superstar
Eh, 7/10
Bunchy Carter
I'll Take The Money Over The Honey
Jared Taylor went missing after Tariq destroyed him lol
This essentially this.
Fact everywhere white people went the local people got hurt, Asians are supposed to be higher IQ than whites and the Opium wars happened.
null
...
Roger king
Superstar
The whole IQ racial theory is just racist bullshyt and propaganda
another one:
null
...
huh?so FBA is the real ADOS
so tariq's grassroots hip hop is the real hip hop
...
null
...
GoPinheiro
Pro
They are also extremely ignorant, can't even contextualize and update their propaganda, thus need to prey on black people that are emotionally guided and always avoid the ones that are historically guided. They carefully select who to debate and what to debate.
It is also the reason they have produced many studies on race-intelligence and penis size(exposing themselves as insecure s!ssies), race-intelligence and body preferences(smart men like boobs, dumb men like asses bs) but never on race-intelligence and pedophilia or bestiality or child pornography, because these are subjects that would clearly not be on their side.
Ironically, they claim J00z are the smartest ethnic group but also blame every degeneracy on Jews. NAMBLA? 86% of Child Porn content being generated in Europe alone? Parades and books supporting bestiality? Blame it on "Da J00z"
Don't even need to go that far...Russia still controls Asian lands. For instance, Outer Manchuria or Russian Manchuria, belongs to China. Manchuria is the original land of the Manchu People, one of the biggest ethnic groups in China. Sakhalin and Kuril islands belong to China and Japan but still occupied by Russia. Outer Mongolia was split into the country of Mongolia and Republic Of Tuva(A Russian state) by Russia.
Russia borders Ukraine and also borders North Korea, more than 4,000 miles away from each other, because Russia still colonizes between 20 to 30% Asia's total area...
Russia and US are the ones who divided Korea in 2, North and South.
"On 10 August 1945 two young officers – Dean Rusk and Charles Bonesteel – were assigned to define an American occupation zone. Working on extremely short notice and completely unprepared, they used a National Geographic map to decide on the 38th parallel as the dividing line. They chose it because it divided the country approximately in half but would place the capital Seoul under American control. No experts on Korea were consulted. The two men were unaware that forty years before, Japan and pre-revolutionary Russia had discussed sharing Korea along the same parallel. Rusk later said that had he known, he "almost surely" would have chosen a different line.[13][14] The division placed sixteen million Koreans in the American zone and nine million in the Soviet zone.[15]"
Division of Korea - Wikipedia
And the US is the only reason there wasn't a major scramble of China.
Back in the days, I remember debating one of them, and he said something like "Well, if Africans, Natives etc were smart, they wouldn't let Europeans change their borders or take their lands. Look at East Asians"...Then I asked him and posted evidence of "Then how come Russia and USA were able to split Korea in half? Both groups have lower IQs than Koreans, right? And how come Russia still controls Chinese lands(Russia still controls millions of km2 belonging to China)? Shouldn't high IQ China be the one controlling Russian lands and not the opposite?" and from that moment, it was gold comedy, it was just a bunch of "So so so what? But but but but Everyone suffered, we all have to move on."
It's basically how they function. They always place value on things that they believe will put black people in a bad light, until it doesn't and suddenly it doesn't matter anymore.
"Oh oh, where are the pillars and columns that black people invented in construction? Writing system?"...Gets exposed to the range, from Ashanti, Benin, Bamum etc or to systems like Nsibidi etc and also gets exposed to the fact that is them who failed to independently develop any kind of writing(not even proto-writing) or construction pillars and columns, that they were not Greco-Romans and thus can't claim things that other groups developed and that they were forced to adopt(due to Greco-Roman colonization and enslavement in their lands) thousands of years after its development...And after this, it is just "Oh oh, so so so what? I only care about the present"
Also, I feel like they bring Asians a lot in these conversations, in order to pacify East Asians. On that "Look at them, we did a lot of shyt to them, still control some of their lands but they don't complain anymore. They just moved on, unlike blacks" vibe...
Last edited:
exactly anyone can cherry pick history to come to their own conclusions. I Mean the Egyptians created Pyramids before euros created anything?They are also extremely ignorant, can't even contextualize and update their propaganda, thus need to prey on black people that are emotionally guided and always avoid the ones that are historically guided. They carefully select who to debate and what to debate.
It is the reason they have produced many studies on intelligence and penis size(exposing themselves as insecure s!ssies), intelligence and body preferences(smart men like boobs, dumb men like asses bs) but never on intelligence vs pedophilia or bestiality or child pornography because it is something that would clearly not be on their side.
Ironically, they claim J00z are the smartest ethnic group but also blame every degeneracy on Jews. NAMBLA? 86% of Child Porn content being generated in Europe alone? Parades and books supporting bestiality? Blame it on "Da J00z"
Don't even need to go that far...Russia still controls Asian lands. For instance, Outer Manchuria or Russian Manchuria, belongs to China. Manchuria is the original land of the Manchu People, one of the biggest ethnic groups in China. Sakhalin and Kuril islands belong to China and Japan but still occupied by Russia.
Russia borders Ukraine and also borders North Korea, more than 4,000 miles away from each other, because Russia still colonizes between 20 to 30% Asia's total area...
Russia and US are the ones who divided Korea in 2, North and South.
"On 10 August 1945 two young officers – Dean Rusk and Charles Bonesteel – were assigned to define an American occupation zone. Working on extremely short notice and completely unprepared, they used a National Geographic map to decide on the 38th parallel as the dividing line. They chose it because it divided the country approximately in half but would place the capital Seoul under American control. No experts on Korea were consulted. The two men were unaware that forty years before, Japan and pre-revolutionary Russia had discussed sharing Korea along the same parallel. Rusk later said that had he known, he "almost surely" would have chosen a different line.[13][14] The division placed sixteen million Koreans in the American zone and nine million in the Soviet zone.[15]"
Division of Korea - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
And the US is the only reason there wasn't a major scramble of China.
Back in the days, I remember debating one of them, and he said something like "Well, if Africans, Natives etc were smart, they wouldn't let Europeans change their borders or take their lands. Look at East Asians"...Then I asked him and posted evidence of "Then how come Russia and USA were able to split Korea in half? Both groups have lower IQs than Koreans, right? And how come Russia still controls Chinese lands? Shouldn't high IQ China be the one controlling Russian lands and not the opposite?" and from that moment, it was gold comedy, it was just a bunch of "So so so what? But but but but Everyone suffered, we all have to move on."
It's basically how they function. They always place value on things that they believe will put black people in a bad light, until it doesn't and suddenly it doesn't matter anymore.
"Oh oh, where are the pillars and columns that black people invented in construction? Writing system?"...Gets exposed to the range, from Ashanti, Benin, Bamum or to systems like Nsibidi etc and also gets exposed to the fact that is them who failed to independently develop any kind of writing(not even proto-writing) or construction pillars and columns, that they were not Greco-Romans and thus can't claim things that other groups developed and they adopted thousands of years after its development..."Oh oh, so so so what? I only care about the present"
Also, I feel like they do they bring Asians a lot in these conversations, in order to pacify East Asians. On that "Look at them, we did a lot of shyt to them, still control some of their lands but they don't complain anymore. They just moved on, unlike blacks" vibe...
If you go with they were Black Argument well no way you can't say Timbuktu wasn't Black?
They were influenced by the arabs? Ok then you have Great Zimbabwe.
But people beleive what they want to beleive and frankly as a whole white people generally speaking just aren't good people based off the historic evidence.
GoPinheiro
Pro
Yeap, and that's the funny thing, they are the main ones always trying to look for foreign influences in Afro societies but the moment you show, that it is them, that failed to do anything without influence from outsiders, they change the tone to "Well, I don't really care about who influenced who. Look at us now".
But essentially, they did nothing without foreign influences. Even the architecture they pride themselves in, is just a bunch of b*stardized versions of Greco-Roman architecture, that was clearly developed in the Near East. A good example of this is their presence in the New World, where settle colonialism happened and still dominates the landscape. Their colonial architecture is basically just that. White House? US Capitol? National Congress of Argentina building? They all clearly show columns, pillars, pediments, entablature, cornice etc with Middle Eastern origins. Did Europeans invent these? No. Did they invent double domes? No. Did they invent horseshoe arch, trefoil arches, pointed arches or rib vaults? No. All of these were invented in what is now Middle East, thousands of years before they reached Europe. You see it in Palmyra ruins, Petra structures etc. But in their minds, whatever they got from other groups, simply belongs to them, while at the same time policing and making lies about black people...You expose them to this and they start coping with "Middle Easterners are Caucasians/Eurasians too"
But yeah, anyone who is into architecture, can see that so-called European architecture lacks any type of uniqueness. When you deconstruct everything, it always leads to finding out that the main elements were created and developed outside of Europe. It's not like the architecture of, let's say, reconstructed Benin palaces or Ashanti palaces, where you see that all the main elements are indigenous and only be traced to black people.
They couldn't even develop agriculture alone, failed to domesticate any crop on their own, but spent years parroting the nonsense that Africans didn't have agriculture before interacting with them...And now, since it has been debunked and doesn't make sense anymore, they are changing their tones to "Oh, blacks had agriculture but was introduced to them by foreigners from the Levant or whatever" Lol
I believe that due to white fragility, they spend more time obsessing over other groups, trying to dictate the history of other groups, especially black people, in order to avoid analyzing their own people and their shortcomings.
Last edited: