The fukk did I say?


The fukk did I say?


The fukk did I say?![]()
IF the money gets spent that way.Why can't you do both? Overhaul government expenditure and allocation, and raise more revenue? You'd rather have dave the 1%er receiving 4.6 million instead of 3.6 million to buy another yacht instead of that money being invested in fusion research or medicine research or NASA or infrastructure or education?
Lol at bias. I guess every subjective view you have and what you value is "bias"
ESPECIALLY during globalization.I wouldn't say that. The more you tax rich people the more they find ways to hide it eroding some of the effectiveness of the tax raise.
Works in medicineSpeculation is good enough when it confirms biases![]()


If I could I would institute a global tax to get more than 1 trillion from the rich to fund cancer research, fusion research, nano technology, and a giant space elevator, in between setting up the big government fema death camps and declaring transfer payments to be the only income
![]()

You're. Not. American.I like the tax free threshold for income earners under 18,000. I like some tax offsets and rebates. I don't really like the Goods and Services Tax (GST) we have. I don't like some tarriffs that we have. I don't like the structure of the Medicare levy.![]()


This is what I don't understand about dude. He lives in one of the most expensive places on earth (peep his username) in one of the most expensive cities on earth Sydney and Melbourne hold their places among 10 most expensive citiesActually 18000 Australian dollars is pretty close to our 0% income tax bracket....
Then you turn around and bytch about the tipping culture in America when you charge 10% on top of everything.![]()
Make a note. You're on ignore now anywayright there in the link lazy fella. i made a note to avoid your nonsense in the future.
The Economics of Taxation
Notes Say:
It is a glaring absurdity to pretend, that taxation contributes to national wealth, by engrossing part of the national produce, and enriches the nation by consuming part of its wealth.[2]
Taxation is the transfer of a portion of the national products from the hands of individuals to those of the government, for the purpose of meeting public consumption or expenditure. Whatever be the denomination it bears, whether tax, contribution, duty, excise, custom, aid, subsidy, grant, or free gift, it is virtually a burden imposed upon individuals, either in a separate or corporate character, by the ruling power for the time being, for the purpose of supplying the consumption it may think proper to make at their expense; in short, an impost, in the literal sense.[3]

If that was true the person who dapped your post would be taking L's 24/7
Hyperbole = admitting a loss, breh.

U are not going to get very far in ur field if u keep ignoring everything that doesn't confirm your biasesMake a note. You're on ignore now anyway![]()

Bruh I have pleaded with @Napoleon not to dap me numerous times, I dont control that dude.If that was true the person who dapped your post would be taking L's 24/7
And it wasn't hyperbole for the first half![]()
Mises is an objective or insightful source?U are not going to get very far in ur field if u keep ignoring everything that doesn't confirm your biases![]()