Tell me why you hate ESPN again?

[gho3st]

what a lineup

 

[HalfwayHandsome]

because they use wack punchlines thinking they are cool and trendy

 

[Originalman]

Fox sports moto for their sports radio lineup should be "Stay White"

 

[NerdNash]

Why would a man ever turn his back on ESPN?

 

[Ed MOTHEREFFING G]

Because they create news rather than report news far too often, and let people who have never been respected sports writers or journalists cite sources with no merit and report it as news in order to create content for days. Those same journalists writers tv personalities get no penalties or backlash for being proven to be patently false.

Also because they have no credible shows outside of a documentary series created by someone they squeezed out of their company, and they focus on sports they are financially vested in over sports and events they are not.

In addition, their live sports content is inferior to their competition; specifically CBS and NBC's college football broadcast trumps theirs, TNT's basketball broadcast trumps ESPNs, and ESPN/ABC's scheduling is abhorrent.

Lastly, because they villify athletes who don't cow-tow to their methods and requests, and protect those that do. Sadly, often those athletes are also on different racial sides of the fence, and they judge the character of said athletes in significantly different ways.

Should I continue or is that sufficient?

 

[Morose Polymath]

Because they create news rather than report news far too often, and let people who have never been respected sports writers or journalists cite sources with no merit and report it as news in order to create content for days.

Also because they have no credible shows outside of a documentary series created by someone they squeezed out of their company, and they focus on sports they are financially vested in over sports and events they are not.

In addition, their live sports content is inferior to their competition; specifically CBS and NBC's college football broadcast trumps theirs, TNT's basketball broadcast trumps ESPNs, and ESPN/ABC's scheduling is abhorrent.

Lastly, because they villify athletes who don't cow-tow to their methods and requests, and protect those that do. Sadly, often those athletes are also on different racial sides of the fence, and they judge the character of said athletes in significantly different ways.

Should I continue or is that sufficient?

repped breh.

 

[keond]

Fox sports moto for their sports radio lineup should be "Stay White"

Not one of them cacs ever picked up a ball in they life

 

[BXKingPin82]

I remember one time my pops said white folk would just rather talk about sports than actually participate in them shyts

Nasty Nas to Esco to Escobar my pops is Nastradamus!!

 

[O.iatlhawksfan]

ESPN radio shyts on FOX. Why do they have The Herd and the Rich Eison show on the same time slot

 

[duckbutta]

Because they create news rather than report news far too often, and let people who have never been respected sports writers or journalists cite sources with no merit and report it as news in order to create content for days. Those same journalists writers tv personalities get no penalties or backlash for being proven to be patently false.

Also because they have no credible shows outside of a documentary series created by someone they squeezed out of their company, and they focus on sports they are financially vested in over sports and events they are not.

In addition, their live sports content is inferior to their competition; specifically CBS and NBC's college football broadcast trumps theirs, TNT's basketball broadcast trumps ESPNs, and ESPN/ABC's scheduling is abhorrent.

Lastly, because they villify athletes who don't cow-tow to their methods and requests, and protect those that do. Sadly, often those athletes are also on different racial sides of the fence, and they judge the character of said athletes in significantly different ways.

Should I continue or is that sufficient?

Nominated for post of the year.

 

[FTBS]

Because they create news rather than report news far too often, and let people who have never been respected sports writers or journalists cite sources with no merit and report it as news in order to create content for days. Those same journalists writers tv personalities get no penalties or backlash for being proven to be patently false.

Also because they have no credible shows outside of a documentary series created by someone they squeezed out of their company, and they focus on sports they are financially vested in over sports and events they are not.

In addition, their live sports content is inferior to their competition; specifically CBS and NBC's college football broadcast trumps theirs, TNT's basketball broadcast trumps ESPNs, and ESPN/ABC's scheduling is abhorrent.

Lastly, because they villify athletes who don't cow-tow to their methods and requests, and protect those that do. Sadly, often those athletes are also on different racial sides of the fence, and they judge the character of said athletes in significantly different ways.

Should I continue or is that sufficient?

Props for being concise, thorough, and etherous all at the same time

 

[Bishop_BP_Jakes]

Because they create news rather than report news far too often, and let people who have never been respected sports writers or journalists cite sources with no merit and report it as news in order to create content for days. Those same journalists writers tv personalities get no penalties or backlash for being proven to be patently false.

Also because they have no credible shows outside of a documentary series created by someone they squeezed out of their company, and they focus on sports they are financially vested in over sports and events they are not.

In addition, their live sports content is inferior to their competition; specifically CBS and NBC's college football broadcast trumps theirs, TNT's basketball broadcast trumps ESPNs, and ESPN/ABC's scheduling is abhorrent.

Lastly, because they villify athletes who don't cow-tow to their methods and requests, and protect those that do. Sadly, often those athletes are also on different racial sides of the fence, and they judge the character of said athletes in significantly different ways.

Should I continue or is that sufficient?

 

[Sauce Dab]

Because they create news rather than report news far too often, and let people who have never been respected sports writers or journalists cite sources with no merit and report it as news in order to create content for days. Those same journalists writers tv personalities get no penalties or backlash for being proven to be patently false.

Also because they have no credible shows outside of a documentary series created by someone they squeezed out of their company, and they focus on sports they are financially vested in over sports and events they are not.

In addition, their live sports content is inferior to their competition; specifically CBS and NBC's college football broadcast trumps theirs, TNT's basketball broadcast trumps ESPNs, and ESPN/ABC's scheduling is abhorrent.

Lastly, because they villify athletes who don't cow-tow to their methods and requests, and protect those that do. Sadly, often those athletes are also on different racial sides of the fence, and they judge the character of said athletes in significantly different ways.

Should I continue or is that sufficient?

Thread/

 

[Juggalo Fred]

Jay mohr sports is the best thing on radio


OP sucks

 

[1thouwow]

I don't necessarily hate it but I'd rather there not be a monopoly on sport news.