Texas Age Verification Bill Would Plaster Health Warnings On Porn Sites

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
44,340
Reputation
7,364
Daps
134,297

from the bull-shyt-pseudoscience dept​

Thu, Jun 1st 2023 10:52am - Michael McGrady
Just when we didn’t think the state of Texas could get any more wacko on tech policy, this latest bill really suggests otherwise. House Bill 1181 is an age verification measure that is similar to what we’ve seen in the state legislatures across other red U.S. states.

You have an age verification proposal that is similar to Louisiana Act 440 and Utah’s Senate Bill 287 – all porn sites with users from these states must have a government ID or a credit card in order to verify age in order to watch age-restricted content. But, the bill itself takes an extreme turn in the guise of protecting the general public’s health.

House Bill 1181, introduced by a team of anti-porn legislators, would require porn sites to post public health warnings from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission as if it were a pack of cigarettes or a bottle of wine. I briefly reviewed the bill and found it presented as if it were a measure to counter youth electronic cigarette usage through punitive means or to add a public health tinge to a crisis that isn’t necessarily related to public health or even a crisis in some circles. In fact, Texas – among other states – has always been at the center of the movement to make porn consumption a health crisis.

HB 1181 would issue public health warnings including claims that porn use “increases the demand for prostitution, child exploitation, and child pornography.” Claims that are included in the health warnings laid out by the bill suggest that porn use is “potentially biologically addictive, is proven to harm human brain development, desensitizes brain reward circuits, increases conditioned responses, and weakens brain function.” Or, that exposure to porn “is associated with low self-esteem and body image eating disorders, impaired brain development, and other emotional and mental illnesses.” Note how they use the term “exposure” as if a person watching porn was exposed to a real disease.

Such warnings follow talking points laid out by resolutions passed by state legislatures classifying pornography as a public health crisis. In 2019, Governing interviewed GOP Utah state Sen. Todd Weiler – the first state lawmaker in the union to introduce model legislation recognizing pornography as a risk to public health. The model legislation is the brainchild of an anti-porn group, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, and is by no means an original campaign to try and prohibit otherwise protected forms of speech.

In this report, Weiler lauded the center despite the fact that he was essentially signing onto a right-wing movement that’s been debunked legally and, importantly, scientifically.

There is no such thing as porn addiction. The American Psychiatric Association and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) point out that pornography addiction isn’t an official diagnosis recognized by the major medical and scientific communities at large. Rather, any problem with pornography consumption can be attributed to compulsive sexual behavior or something similar to that. There is a clear difference between compulsion and addiction as determined by urge versus need.

Neuroscientists Nicole Prause and Vaughn Steele have produced peer-reviewed studies on porn addiction. A study published in the journal Biological Psychology several years ago reaffirmed previous findings that porn and sex addiction are not real by any means.

“The statements on science effects are just false, they have never been shown,” said Prause in an email to me. She elaborated that the “science” referred to in House Bill 1181 is “completely fabricated.” “APA and WHO both rejected sex and pornography as addictions because they are not. The bill flies in the face of scientific consensus.”

Michael McGrady is a journalist and commentator focusing on the tech side of the online porn business, among other things

Filed Under: hb 1181, health warnings, moral panic, porn, porn addiction, texas
 

Youngdev

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
11,161
Reputation
1,306
Daps
52,028
is there data out there that shows porn is harmful to brain development

Or these folks just making shyt up
 

Buddy

Keep my name out of it
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
16,288
Reputation
5,005
Daps
69,742
they don't want her to vote. :francis:
I started to think you're on to something but she found the September date when she got home and online. They fukkin over everybody in her shoes but xvideos? :ufdup:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
44,340
Reputation
7,364
Daps
134,297
I started to think you're on to something but she found the September date when she got home and online. They fukkin over everybody in her shoes but xvideos? :ufdup:

it's a numbers game, they KNOW which demographic of voters is likely to possess a certain type of identification and use them on election day.

these are the ID's that are acceptable..

  • Texas Driver License issued by the Texas
  • Department of Public Safety (DPS)
  • Texas Election Identification Certificate issued by DPS
  • Texas Personal Identification Card issued by DPS
  • Texas Handgun License issued by DPS
  • United States Military Identification Card containing your photograph
  • United States Citizenship Certificate containing your photograph
  • United States Passport (book or card)


they know black and latino residents in texas are less likely to have those others types of identification compared to a drivers license. white drivers aren't penalized as much for not having a drivers license since they don't get pulled over at the same rate. throwing a wrench in the DMV processes is a diabolical solution to slowing down the rate of obtaining identification documents.
 
Last edited:

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
44,340
Reputation
7,364
Daps
134,297

Pornhub Sues Texas Over Age Verification Law​


The law would require a “Texas Health and Human Services Warning” on all porn sites.

By Samantha Cole
August 11, 2023, 11:12am
1691766702776-gettyimages-1536272932.jpeg

GETTY IMAGES



Pornhub, along with several other members and activists in the adult industry are suing Texas to block the state’s impending law that would require age verification to view adult content.


The complaint was filed on August 4 in US District Court for the Western District of Texas, and the law will take effect on September 1 unless the court agrees to block it. Governor Greg Abbott passed HB 1181 into law in June.

The plaintiffs, including Pornhub, adult industry advocacy group Free Speech Coalition, and several other site operators and industry members, claim that the law violates both the Constitution of the United States and the federal Communications Decency Act.

In the complaint, the plaintiffs write that the act employs “the least effective and yet also the most restrictive means of accomplishing Texas’ stated purpose of allegedly protecting minors,” and that minors can easily use VPNs or Tor; on-device content filtering would be a better method of restricting access to porn for children, they write. “But such far more effective and far less restrictive means don’t really matter to Texas, whose true aim is not to protect minors but to squelch constitutionally protected free speech that the State disfavors.”

Under the law, porn sites would be required to display a “Texas Health and Human Services Warning” on their websites in 14-point font or larger font, in addition to age verification.

“Texas could easily spread its ideological, anti-pornography message through public service announcements and the like without foisting its viewpoint upon others through mandated statements that are a mix of falsehoods, discredited pseudo-science, and baseless accusations,” the complaint says.

In January, Louisiana enacted a law that requires website operators to implement age verification technology if their site consists of 33.3 percent or more material on a site that’s “harmful to minors.” The laws typically define content that’s harmful to minors as appealing to prurient interests, and that consists of “pubic hair, anus, vulva, genitals, or nipple of the female breast; Touching, caressing, or fondling of nipples, breasts, buttocks, anuses, or genitals; Sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation; flagellation, excretory functions, exhibitions, or any other sexual act.”

Six states have passed copycat laws since then. Pornhub has blocked anyone visiting from an IP address located in several of those states, including Utah and Virginia, where visitors are met with a plea from adult performer Cherie Deville to contact their representatives.
 
Top