So he should be suspended based on your personal opinion.
Not precedent, not the rulebook, just because you decided.
Well, unluckily for you NBA isn't pulling that trigger.

if this was game 6 3-2 he would be suspended
its only cuz its a game 7
So he should be suspended based on your personal opinion.
Not precedent, not the rulebook, just because you decided.
Well, unluckily for you NBA isn't pulling that trigger.
I'm amazed people are looking past this post. This right here shows more precedent for Curry to not be suspended for a more similar situation.
Yea, you cant throw projectiles at the fans..... that can lead to injuries and lawsuits..... he gotta be punished. Fair is fair..... cant all of a sudden change the rule for this dude.
Again if this was Sheed or Artest..... they'd probably get a minimum of 20 and escorted off the court by security
I am pretty sure that if it were Artest then David Stern would be coming out of retirement to run on the floor to help security haul Artest's ass away. As a matter a fact Stern would beat security getting to Artest. That is why the league is a sham. The rules only applies to certain players.
He probably should be suspended, but the NBA doesn't want to deal with GSW fan protests. They legit might not even show up to Game 7 if Curry got suspended.
It depends on where those mouthpieces ended up. If they just landed on the ground, then that isn't a fair comparison, steph himself said he always throws it.I'm amazed people are looking past this post. This right here shows more precedent for Curry to not be suspended for a more similar situation.